this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2026
126 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

11432 readers
1009 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 hours ago

Many don't realize that the first buyers aren't the only ones to benefit from these incentives. When the first buyers sell, they add EVs to the second hand market, so everyone benefits.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 hours ago

Hopefully tesla is not on a list of EV incentives due to the gaming of Canada's EV rebates in the recent past. Also, and never forget, a believer of the Nazi way of life is selling you those teslar's.

[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

But not for Tesla, right?.padme.jpg

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 0 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Why. These Chinese EVs are already cheaper, why do we need to be subsidizing EVs not made in Canada. I guess Carney wants to kill the Ontario auto industry.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago

Tariffs stop them being cheaper and this is to replace the mandate of car companies switching to electric.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Non electric auto industry should be killed, yes.

[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 0 points 11 hours ago

Bro, carney, opening the bank account for people to buy china's EV's, trade with china better pay out old man.

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is good news, hopefully this starts a chain reaction into clean energy and battery manufacturing.

Canada could become a big player in clean energy and manufacture its own batteries.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 0 points 9 hours ago

Those battery plants have already failed. Canada has no IP to make batteries. EV sales are barely 9%.

[–] ZC3rr0r@piefed.ca 6 points 1 day ago

Sad to see the EV targets get softened like that, but with Chinese vehicles entering the market and the price disparity between combustion vehicles and EVs narrowing this is exactly the kind of thing that will help nudge the market along to organically grow EV adoption to similar percentages as previously mandated.

[–] Scotty@scribe.disroot.org 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Such incentives should be available only for 'Made in Canada' products (and I mean really made in Canada, not just sold by a company with headquarters in Canada but all the production abroad). The EU is in the process of establishing a similar a law afaik.

[–] acorn_auto@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Are there any vehicles 'really made' in any single country? For instance, I don't think there are any cars 100% made in the US. Assembled in the US of course, but my understanding is the parts come from around the world - the Corvette is the first example that comes up in a search - assembled at the Bowling Green, Kentucky plant, using a combination of domestic and international parts. Roughly 40-41% of parts for the 2025 C8 originate from the U.S. and Canada, while approximately 31-32% are sourced from Mexico...

[–] Scotty@scribe.disroot.org 1 points 16 hours ago

I agree. But such incentives should be given only if a substantial part of the overall product benefits the Canadian economy. If parts from abroad are used, then those areas or countries that share Canadian democratic values may be given a similar status imo. Canada shouldn't give money to autocratic states where people often work under slave-like conditions.

There are no 100% American made vehicles. Tesla is actually the top most American made vehicle and is not all American made.

[–] veeesix@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not surprised to see Doug flip-flop on EV incentives. I wonder where we’d be now in Ontario if EV rebates kept pace 5 years ago.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Why the fuck were we rebating $110,000 Tesla's?

This ranks right up with removing taxes on private jets and yachts.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We may have had EV manufacturing established in the Ford Oakville plant by now. There used to be plans for that.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

For made an EV pickup. No one bought them.

Lemmy is delusional. For every EV, Canadians buy 100 pickups and large SUVs.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago

For made an EV pickup. No one bought them.

Have you seen the prices the were asking?

Make them less of a "luxury " vehicle (both in terms of "options" and price) and more people will want to buy.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

Nice, I need to check for a new car too.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Interesting this comes after trade deal with china to sell electric cars...so Canadian tax payers are subsidizing Chinese profits...

[–] twopi@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

China bad is excluded in this rebate plan.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 hours ago

So it's for Tesla.

Is it better to subsidizing facsist profits ?

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

I believe the rebate is only available to vehicles sold from countries that have free trade agreements with Canada. That excludes China.

[–] CountVon@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hah, what profits?? Chinese auto makers have been massively subsidized by the Chinese government for the last several years. Any profits on their balance sheets have been propped up by those subsidies. The Chinese government has already indicated that those subsidies will be ending, because they've created a supply glut that China cannot absorb domestically and cannot offload internationally. No country on the planet is going to allow the wholesale dumping of heavily subsidized Chinese autos into their domestic market since it would damage or destroy any local auto manufacturing industry.

Carney's decision to allow a nominal amount of Chinese EVs is smart because it's a net win for Canada no matter what happens. It gets Canadian soybeans shipping to China again, while the number of EVs being allowed is too small to have an outsized effect on the Canadian auto industry. That's just the basic first-order stuff, there are huge potential upsides down the road. This acts as a trial balloon to see whether the Canadian market has an appetite for Chinese made autos. I suspect yes at first just based on price, but those prices will rise as Chinese subsidies draw down. If Canadians show a willingness to buy Chinese made autos, Canada can float expanding the import limit in exchange for some percentage of local manufacture.

The US auto industry is pulling back from Canada, so Canada is making deals with South Korean auto makers. We've seen what happened when Canada put too many eggs in the proverbial US basket. Replacing those US auto makers with a variety of foreign makers (Germany, South Korea, maybe China down the road) is just pragmatic risk mitigation. It gives us a better local manufacturing base while ensuring we're not overly beholden to a single foreign trading partner.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 hours ago

And Ontario assembly plants have been subsidized by government for 75 years.