this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2026
74 points (92.0% liked)

Asklemmy

52761 readers
524 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 46 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

People protesting agains the arms industry will generally focus on the bigger problem, which is all the people being killed.

"Stop murdering people" is probably a more powerful message than "Stop wasting resources on murdering people".

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz -5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This makes me wonder if some people are using the power usage issue to attack AI in general.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Using a massive negative of AI to attack AI is confusing to you?

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What's confusing to me is why the power energy negative is being used only to attack AI

[–] warm@kbin.earth 7 points 1 day ago

It's not? Power draw and efficiency has always been used as a major negative to a lot of things, it's why we have more power efficient devices now.

AI is consuming this power for what exactly? It's entirely pointless, only there to enable a circular economy among mega-corporations.

It's also entirely irrelevant if something is a negative to one thing and not another. When talking drawbacks for something, there isn't a list you have to pick from, they are going to be specific to it.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

I want to rephrase what the other person commented a bit friendlier. If power usage was not an issue it would likely not be attacked as much. Same goes for bit coin. Both would still have issues. Output that appears better than it use leading to inappropriate or non reviewed use (law documents and such) for the one and just a programmed scam (currency programmed to inflate in value while holding no actual value)

[–] Leon_Grotsky@hexbear.net 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Some of us have been, since the 2000's if not earlier (can't speak to that personally.)

Here's the description of Abby Martin's new film "Earth's Greatest Enemy":

Earth’s Greatest Enemy, the second feature film project by Abby Martin, is a groundbreaking anti-imperialist environmental documentary.

Exempt from international climate agreements and rarely scrutinized in mainstream reporting, the Pentagon is the world’s single largest institutional polluter—spewing carbon, contaminating water, and scarring landscapes across the globe. Combining investigative journalism, striking visuals, and stories from impacted communities, this film challenges audiences to rethink the hidden costs of a global military empire and its planetary consequences. Provocative, urgent, and eye-opening, this is a documentary that will change how you see both the military and environmentalism.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 17 points 1 day ago

The complaints about the arms industry/the cost of war has been around since recorded history.

AI server farms has only been around for a few years.

[–] Azarova@hexbear.net 19 points 1 day ago

Because for people in the imperial core, AI slop invading every part of the internet and making it viscerally worse is more visible and tangible than imperialism destroying lives and the environment (mostly) abroad.

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 25 points 1 day ago (3 children)

People have protested the military industrial complex for decades and centuries. Possibly even millennia.

YOU not being aware of it is different from it not happening.

Stop the false equivalency and whataboutism.

[–] wuphysics87@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

Well that escalated

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

People have protested the military industrial complex for decades and centuries.

Here on lemmy i've seen more people cheering up at europe's rearmament than i've seen complaining about the military industrial complex power waste.

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Europe is supporting Ukraine in an existential fight for their lives.

This is far different from wanting to generate a false naked picture of some person.

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 14 hours ago

Europe is supporting Ukraine in an existential fight for their lives.

European governments are supporting ukraine government in multiple ways including sending them weapons, this has not much to do with european countries boosting their already over the top military budget.

This is far different from wanting to generate a false naked picture of some person.

I would argue that generating a false naked picture of someone is less harmful for humanity than spending the same amount of energy to develop a weapon designed to murder other human beings.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

yeah the crazy mileag of tanks and when they talk about how much every flight of a warplane costs its not just personelle. I guess its sorta good we have nuclear ships.

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 1 points 1 day ago

This is all true.

Plus the pointless murdering of humans.

[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I mean I'm also pissed about the war industry wasting our precious resources on death and destruction. I can be pissed about multiple things! The depths of my hatred for capitalism are literally limitless! It's just that the "death and destruction part" dominates my opposition of the industry.

Speak for yourself I’ve BEEN complaining about the wasted resources not to mention the evil nature of the arms industry

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Because you get accused of wanting all Ukrainians to die if you oppose the mainstream narrative. And before that it was about being against freedom or something.

All mainstream media stands together to brainwash people for the military industrial complex.

[–] racoon@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago

I live in a Catholic country. Well, I know, countries can’t have religions. Let’s say that the élites impose the marketing and propaganda of that corporation. Every year, they block the streets with massive far-right demonstrations. People dressed as KKK wander the streets burning candles which cost thousands in manpower to clean. On the other hand, when I was younger, people would freely gather at night to have drinks in the street squares. They would litter a lot. The press used to create a great problem about the people drinking but not about the people dropping candle wax.

Pollution, as crime, is only a political concern when it’s done by the lower classes

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Because war industry is an old story and killing people mostly happen in global south which is benefitting capitalist core so average liberal/conservative just see it as benefit and jobs. AI is new and trendy boogeyman and it's at home.

[–] AnnaFrankfurter@lemmy.ml 1 points 22 hours ago

You know because arms industry has arms they can use to threaten and kill us

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago

Ai is new and added on top of that. Most of us have realized we aren't gonna stop the military industrial complex unless there is a revolution

Ok let me try a different angle. I think the reason why AI is such a hotly debated topic right now is that AI is something that influences the lives of white westerners directly, while war is an abstract concept for most. To put it more bluntly, you're in contact with AI stuff every day, but there are no tanks rolling down your street (yet - but that might change soon).

[–] ClathrateG@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago

Stopping or curtailing the former could viably be done through regulation in a 'liberal democracy' and is thus conceivable to libs, stopping the latter would require huge change in the management of states and their interrelations which the lib mind cannot/does not want conceive

[–] DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The Military Industrial Complex has been normalized over centuries. Humanity just can't stop killing each other. It's an instinct that evolved to be helpful to survival at one point thousands of years ago but may actually mean the end of humanity soon.

AI and all of the resources it consumes have not yet been normalized to anywhere near the level of "Defense".

Give it time and average humans will care just as little about all the resources consumed by AI as they care about all the resources consumed by war. Unfortunately I seriously doubt that it will go the other way around and humans will suddenly start caring more about the resources consumed by the Military Industrial Complex. That ship has sailed...

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 3 points 1 day ago

Humanity just can’t stop killing each other. It’s an instinct that evolved to be helpful to survival at one point thousands of years ago

Killing other humans is not an instinct at all. Self defense when threatened is an instinct, people get tricked by these in power to feel in danger and to kill others.

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago

AI is new, the military industrial complex is not.

[–] florencia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Bombs are carefully manufactured with waste products controlled, and products blowing up today's enemies coming to kill your kids. The demands placed on a local population are moderate and can be adjusted to.

AI center sucks up water and electricity (making it expensive to local neighborhood), pollutes area surrounding it, very quick to setup so neighborhoods have no time to adjust, and product is only marketable to people who are tired of using their brain. To a local neighborhood, it's a lot closer to "wtf are we getting out of this?"

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bombs are carefully manufactured with waste products controlled, and products blowing up today’s enemies coming to kill your kids.

I would argue the war industry probably has less regulations than other businesses. In the US there are as many datacenters as military bases/arms factories.

[–] florencia@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I would argue the war industry probably has less regulations than other businesses.

Got proof? Because I'm pretty sure military contractors have to explain themselves to senators and congresspeople that got them the contract if toxic waste leaks out of a "secure" facility.

Datacenters on the other hand are corporations using their own money/investments to grab land, congress/senators didn't ask them to.

[–] Commiejones@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I’m pretty sure military contractors have to explain themselves to senators and congresspeople

the pentagon hasn't passed an audit in its entire history.

if toxic waste leaks out of a “secure” facility.

like nuclear waste

[–] Mangoholic@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And then they have to pay a 10 million fine, but discharging toxic waste saves them 100 million. Very accountable.

[–] florencia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Where is this 10 million fine story? I can't find it.

[–] Mangoholic@lemmy.ml 1 points 14 minutes ago

All the eu data regulation violations usually are in that range.

[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Weapons actually do something you could consider useful, burning up an acre of the Amazon to generate a sfw image of Nami from one piece isn't

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I would argue generating art is less harmful for humanity than crafting weapons designed to kill others and wage war.

some AI slop hallucination of a character it didn't create isn't art

kill others and wage war

yes those are uses of weapons

[–] m532@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wielding the debunked accusation like a club.

[–] notsosure@sh.itjust.works -5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Because war /arms are useful?

[–] wuphysics87@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Have passed proof of concept lets say

[–] WalleyeWarrior@midwest.social -4 points 1 day ago

I wouldn't say "useful" but the military industrial complex does at least employ actual people to create actual things, where as an AI data center just siphons off the resources of an area and creates no jobs. This is avoiding any moral judgement on weapons production, simply saying that the energy that goes into it is creating an actual product.