Are people unaware or have they forgotten that her dad, Chris Butler, is a cult leader?
this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2026
299 points (99.3% liked)
People Twitter
9236 readers
1282 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
"grave damage to national security" is the definition of the Top Secret classification level, and it's probably in several SCI compartments too.
This bitch is a Russian asset who has been exfiltrating national secrets to Putin for years (is the commonly accepted allegation).
Which also means there is no reason Congress cannot be briefed. Congresspersons are routinely read into SCI and SAP compartments for basic oversight duty. They have their own SCIF and everything. If the regime is withholding access to oversight, it's only because Republicans on these committees are refusing to force the issue.
lol half of them are probably named in it.
It's obvious to anyone who reads past the most surface reading of anything. This regime lies just like you and I breathe. Almost everything they say is a lie.
One day, hopefully soon, he will be gone, and this whole thing will hopefully implode, but the damage is done. It's funny, because this whole regime has done "grave damage to national security" in many different senses.
Spoiler: she’s a russian plant.
No shit.
Woody? Herbaceous? Nuclear?
Tulsi has left a paper trail showing how Trump, his entire admin, as well as the scrotus are compromised by Russia/Israel. They're trying to figure out how to bury that along with everything else they're trying to hide.
It also implicates another federal agency
Oooh boy who wants to take bets? Maybe how the FBI covered for her. Maybe she exfiltrated some information, NNSA or DOE would be funny but kinda boring. I'd imagine even just sharing capabilities could land this top secret to begin.
Even with this, wasn't she the one who tagged along with the stealing of the 700 boxes of Georgia election results? Only the best.
Yes she was.
"navigating a unique set of circumstances" When the agency is asked to investigate its own boss.
Being locked in a safe only means Secret or above. However, the use of the phrase "grave damage to national security" indicates Top Secret. That's the sort of thing that's usually only accessed in a SCIF.
whoa weird timing on such a similar comment, 1 minute ago
Must have been typing at the same time. I looked to see if anyone said the same thing. I got distracted in the middle of writing my comment as well. But, yes that wording is very specific.
Putin’s puppet.
When the fact that she is a Russian agent is common knowledge, you have to wonder what is so scary that it has to be locked up.
Who she compromised and their current positions in the administration.
Again, the actual president is OBVIUOSLY compromised. Does it get worse than that?
Since there are dozens of people including Vance, yes it is worse than just one person.
No idea what it could be.
Everything from calling her a Russian asset to voting abuse.
Outside of WSJ's discovery, nothing else is known.
Everything from calling her a Russian asset to voting abuse.
So... is she gonna be the next president of the United States?
A republican woman candidate at this point would be interesting. I imagine her having to occasionally pander to the tradwife stereotype, Katie Britt style, with a little bit of Mom's Old Fashioned Robot Oil and maybe some Martha Stewart mixed in. We got a little preview with Sarah Palin. I wonder what the think tanks learned from that.
I'm all for shitting on any and all members of the Trump regime, but I'm not buying this one: if it's so classified, how come we get to hear about it?
Data about data isn't necessarily at the same classification as the document.
Its always the metadata that gets you
It was in Mar-a-lago's bathroom.
Often people need to know a document exists without knowing the content of that document.
For example, requesting access to that document.
That's an interesting take. What do feel is the goal in this situation?
Get the whistleblower in front of an intelligence congressional committee and ask about it. The regime won't tell you shit if you're not GOP.
Here's the article with a paywall. https://www.wsj.com/politics/national-security/classified-whistleblower-complaint-about-tulsi-gabbard-stalls-within-her-agency-027f5331
Wonder what has been alleged.
Kleptocracy at its best.
My guess is she's sending info to the Russian and Indian governments
Its just such a strange way to phrase this. All sorts of classified and confidential information gets locked in safes, usually because nobody is working on it, not because of how secret it is. It sounds like this piece of information is embarrassing to Trump in some way, which is generally not surprising and would explain why nobody is working on it. Claiming "grave damage to national security" is just a generic way to say they dont want to release it.
It's not generic at all. It's literally the phrase used to describe the Top Secret classification. It's very precise wording.
Yes, thats why they use those words every time they dont want to release something.
You're back peddling now acting like you already knew that. You wouldn't have said it was a generic phrase if you knew that.