this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2026
175 points (95.8% liked)

Not The Onion

19777 readers
1303 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] grue@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

How is this "Oniony?" Maybe regarding liberals, but leftists have never been anti-gun (see e.g. the Black Panthers).

[–] who@feddit.org 7 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Also, there's a well-known reason for this that is plainly obvious to anyone who has been keeping up on US news over the past year.

This doesn't belong here.

[–] garth@sh.itjust.works 72 points 11 hours ago (37 children)
[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 20 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

already happened because black panthers were getting armed

[–] tal@lemmy.today 12 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

The Black Panthers incident that you're referring to:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mulford_Act

The Mulford Act is a 1967 California statute which prohibits public carrying of loaded firearms without a permit.[2] Named after Republican assemblyman Don Mulford and signed into law by governor of California Ronald Reagan, the law was initially crafted with the goal of disarming members of the Black Panther Party, which was conducting armed patrols of Oakland neighborhoods in what would later be termed copwatching.[3][4] They garnered national attention after Black Panthers members, bearing arms, marched upon the California State Capitol to protest the bill.[5][6]

But also, going back prior to that:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturday_night_special

The earliest law prohibiting inexpensive handguns was enacted in Tennessee, in the form of the "Army and Navy Law", passed in 1879, shortly after the 14th amendment and Civil Rights Act of 1875; previous laws invalidated by the constitutional amendment had stated that black freedmen could not own or carry any manner of firearm. The Army and Navy Law prohibited the sale of "belt or pocket pistols, or revolvers, or any other kind of pistols, except army or navy pistols", which were prohibitively expensive for black freedmen and poor whites to purchase.[21] These were large pistols in .36 caliber ("navy") or .44 caliber ("army"), and were the military issue cap and ball black-powder revolvers used during the Civil War by both Union and Confederate ground troops. The effect of the law was to restrict handgun possession to the upper economic classes.[22]

The next major attempt to regulate inexpensive firearms was the Gun Control Act of 1968, which used the "sporting purposes" test and a points system to exclude many small, inexpensive handguns which had been imported from European makers such as Röhm, located in Germany.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

🤔 not sure if helping me make point or criticising my point 🤷

[–] tal@lemmy.today 8 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Well...I'm agreeing that it happened and was a factor, but also pointing out that the "don't let black people have guns" practice predated the Black Panthers stuff by a considerable amount of time.

EDIT: Basically, a major concern in the US in the runup to the American Civil War was the prospect of a slave uprising. There were a lot of black people in the US who had been kept as slaves and were not super happy about the fact.

At about the same time, in Haiti, there had been such an uprising.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haitian_Revolution

Shortly after the revolution:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1804_Haitian_massacre

The 1804 Haiti massacre was carried out by Haitian rebel soldiers, mostly former slaves, under orders from Jean-Jacques Dessalines[1][2][3][4] against much of the remaining European population in Haiti, which mainly included French Colonists.[5][6] The Haitian Revolution defeated the French army in November 1803 and the Haitian Declaration of Independence happened on 1 January 1804.[7]

Throughout the early-to-mid nineteenth century, the events of the massacre were well known in the United States. Additionally, many Saint Domingue refugees moved from Saint-Domingue to the U.S., settling in New Orleans, Charleston, New York, Baltimore, and other coastal cities. These events spurred fears of potential uprisings in the Southern U.S. and they also polarized public opinion on the question of the abolition of slavery.[9][10]

At the time of the American Civil War, a major pretext for Southern whites, most of whom did not own slaves, to support slave owners (and ultimately fight for the Confederacy) was fear of a slave uprising similar to the Haitian Revolution.[34] The perceived failure of abolition in Haiti and Jamaica were explicitly referred to in Confederate discourse as a reason for secession.[35] The slave revolt was a prominent theme in the discourse of Southern political leaders and had influenced U.S. public opinion since the events took place. Historian Kevin Julius writes:

As abolitionists loudly proclaimed that "All men are created equal", echoes of armed slave insurrections and racial genocide sounded in Southern ears. Much of their resentment towards the abolitionists can be seen as a reaction to the events in Haiti.[9]

In the run-up to the U.S. presidential election of 1860, Roger B. Taney, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, wrote "I remember the horrors of St. Domingo" and said that the election "will determine whether anything like this is to be visited upon our own southern countrymen."[10]

Abolitionists recognized the strength of this argument on public opinion in both the North and South. In correspondence to the New York Times in September 1861 (during the war), an abolitionist named J. B. Lyon addressed this as a prominent argument of his opponents:

We don't know any better than to imagine that emancipation would result in the utter extinction of civilization in the South, because the slave-holders, and those in their interest, have persistently told us ... and they always instance the 'horrors of St. Domingo.'[36]

Lyon argued, however, that the abolition of slavery in the various Caribbean colonies of the European empires before the 1860s showed that an end to slavery could be achieved peacefully.[37]

John Brown attempted to induce such a slave revolt:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Brown%27s_raid_on_Harpers_Ferry

From October 16th to 18th, 1859, American abolitionist John Brown attempted to initiate a slave revolt in Southern states by raiding an armory[nb 1] in Harpers Ferry, Virginia (now West Virginia). The raid is frequently cited as one of the primary causes of the American Civil War.[3]

And you had Nat Turner's Rebellion:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nat_Turner%27s_Rebellion

Nat Turner's Rebellion, historically known as the Southampton Insurrection, was a slave rebellion that took place in Southampton County, Virginia, in August 1831. Led by Nat Turner, the rebels, made up of enslaved African Americans, killed between 55 and 65 White people, making it the deadliest slave revolt for the latter racial group in U.S. history.

So you have the situation after the American Civil War where you have a lot of now-free black people who the US Constitution guarantees the right to arms...and a lot of white people really worried about what happens if they get ahold of said arms. They went out and tried to figure out whatever loopholes they could to make sure that blacks didn't have access to firearms.

load more comments (36 replies)
[–] BaroqueBobby@lemmy.world 13 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Hey to those in here thinking about getting a firearm - please factor into your budget ammunition and semi regular training - once a month or every two months at a minimum, it’s a depreciating skill, trust me. and don’t neglect your cardio and first aid knowledge!

Sincerely, a neighbor

[–] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 28 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Good... good, Let the gentrification of the firearms communites continue. Let white nationalist have nothing for themselves. Let them realize that they have lost it all to actual Americans.

Learn standard life savings techniques in case your fellow protestor get injured while using their 1A. Learn your firearms in case your fellow community members need backup.

Organize.

Learn standard life savings techniques...

Good stuff to know in general. There's a free online first aid class called Stop The Bleed. Like the name implies, it gets straight to the point and tells you how to provide immediate care for someone with a major bleed until someone with more training can show up and take over.

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 12 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

almost political compass, just gotta flip the right side

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

perfect! share it in !politicalcompassmemes@lemmy.world for them points

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 8 points 9 hours ago

I got my Beretta 1301 and am taking my neighbors to the range.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

Same thing is happening in EU. 10 years ago most shooting courses were full of bald neo nazi dudes, but now it’s mostly liberals and leftists who want to protect themselves.

Russia trying to rape and murder a neigbouring country and USA going berserk definitely gave a lot of people the nudge to train and arm themselves (though legal gun ownership options are very limited).

[–] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago

Always happy to see more people exercise their rights.

[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 hours ago

Should start an anti-pedophile gun club

load more comments
view more: next ›