this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2026
348 points (99.4% liked)

politics

27775 readers
2792 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In Trump’s first term, grassroots Democrats focused their ire on the Republican president. But now, after President Joe Biden’s reluctance to step aside in 2024 at age 81 helped pave the way for Trump’s return to the White House, many see their party’s own veterans as part of the problem.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 3 hours ago

I'm an old guy, and I'm all for kicking out the weak old cowardly Democrats, and replacing them with strong, angry young people. They are pissed about past generations losing Democracy, and they are stepping up to take it back. They have my full support.

I will always primary vote for a young person like AOC or Max Frost, before I'll vote for smug old incumbent. Time to term limit a LOT of these losers.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Am old but have seen guys older than me really fucking things up, so sure, get some younger folks interested and into it.

[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

I say this as a person with plenty of years. When the president is so ancient he is shitting himself at meetings, and congresspeople are dying in office - of old age- this has become a gerontocracy of the worst sort. One would hope that as people get older they have more experience, more perspective.

At this point I would very strongly prefer that people younger than me be in office and I'm not even 60 yet. We need people with more stake in the future. 40-60 then out, retire for the sake of the country. Write a book or something.

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 8 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

When wa the last time the Democrats had a really broad field of choices in the primary? I remember the Republican primaries leading up to the '16 election, the field was huge. And Trump crushed them all. I feel like Democrats haven't had much choice in way too long.

[–] TacoSocks@infosec.pub 1 points 10 minutes ago* (last edited 8 minutes ago)

2020 primary.

11 people still had campaigns going when the first state voted. 18 people withdrew before the voting began.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 1 points 2 hours ago

I think if politics are overhauled, we should have political stations as a career track, with term limits at every level. Each term lasts four years, and each level has two terms if elections are won. However, losing an election reduces the number of terms you can have at a level. So if you suck and lose two elections at a rung, you don't have any more terms for it.

In effect, a quick political ascension can be a trap of sorts: Greedy politicians have fewer opportunities to accumulate power and set down lasting roots, and voters will see these politicians avoiding the responsibilities of lower stations. People are more likely to vote for someone who sticks around for two whole terms.

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

If someone progressive would run in my extremely-gerrymandered rural midwest district's primary, that would be fantastic

[–] tubthumper@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Be the change you want to see?

(I know it's easier said than done.)

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 2 points 3 hours ago

I know it's easier said than done

especially since I'm an overseas voter who has zero desire to live in the US again, but still needs to maintain citizenship and thus has all kinds of dumb tax issues thanks to US bullshit.

[–] Puddinghelmet@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Kristi Burke, a 20 something year old, is running for congress in DEEP RED Tennessee
https://www.votekristiburke.com/
Her website (she also sells anti-ICE merch!! )
ig

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

It’s time for a change, time for youth to take the helm and direct this nation and fix the broken democratic system for the good.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 25 points 10 hours ago

Love how 40s to 50s is what we consider a young politician theee days. It's a start, but sad

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It's going to be a tough sell. The DNC is convinced the way to avoid bleeding seats is to move to the right and keep the same old white people.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 5 points 9 hours ago

But the sell is to people who show up to primaries.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 39 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (6 children)

I am convinced that the #1 problem in this country right now is the notion that having a primary challenger is somehow a sign of weakness. Yes, even more important than the creeping fascism, because it directly enables it. Even the opposition may be inclined to keep the creeping fascism creeping along if it guarantees they can keep their job.

The House, in particular, is meant to be the body that is most responsive to the people, because they are theoretically accountable to them every two years. But if you are in a heavily gerrymandered district, and can ensure that you never see a Primary challenge, then it is essentially a lifetime appointment.

I don't particularly mind if there folks keep their jobs into their 70's, as long as they really are the best person for that district. But if they never get any meaningful primary challenge how would we know?

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago

I mean, I'd argue the absolute lack of participation in primaries is the problem. In general complaining but doing nothing is the problem.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 7 hours ago

Yeah, having a primary challenge, and winning, is a sign of strength. Not having a challenge is, at best, just a sign of nothing. It's possibly a sign of weakness, if you used your power to prevent a challenge.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 13 points 14 hours ago (10 children)

Part of the problem is that everything is seniority based. So even if some new upstart may better represent the will of their district, they won't be able to accomplish anything when compared to the person who's been in Congress for 30+ years.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 11 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 3 hours ago

And Max Frost.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BigTuffAl@lemmy.zip 19 points 16 hours ago (80 children)

🙄 does the neo-lib political caste have to be this in-your-face about how irrelevant they are?

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 hours ago

Until we force them out of office, unironically yes. One of the things those with power get off on is exploiting the vulnerable and powerless as a flex. It’s the same reason so many of them hung out on Trump-Epstein island back in the day. They enjoy rubbing our faces in the fact that they consistently do nothing to help us, and routinely sell out our best interests to the donor class.

load more comments (79 replies)
[–] blueworld@piefed.world 6 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Mai Vang, a Sacramento council member running for California's 7th Congressional District, has her campaign website at maiforus.com

Evan Turnage, an antitrust lawyer challenging Mississippi's 2nd District incumbent, has his campaign website at evanturnage.com

Justin Pearson, a Tennessee state representative running for the 9th Congressional District, has his campaign website at votejustinj.com

Luke Bronin, former Hartford mayor challenging Connecticut's 1st District incumbent, has his campaign website at broninforcongress.com

Kore beyond the article:

Deja Foxx, a Gen Z candidate running for Arizona's 7th Congressional District (special election), has her campaign website at dejafoxx.com

Jake Rakov, a 37-year-old political strategist challenging 15-term incumbent Brad Sherman in California's 32nd Congressional District, has his campaign website at jakeforcongress.com

George Hornedo, a 34-year-old former Obama administration and Buttigieg campaign staffer running in Indiana's 7th Congressional District, has his campaign website at georgehornedo.com

Sara Innamorato, a first-time candidate is running against Dom Costa in Pennsylvania’s House District 21.

On the Senate side:

Graham Platner (Maine), a 42-year-old Marine and Army veteran challenging 74-year-old incumbent Susan Collins. His campaign website is grahampforusenate.com

Nathan Sage (Iowa), a Marine veteran and mechanic challenging 56-year-old incumbent Joni Ernst. His campaign website is sageforsenate.com

Mallory McMorrow (Michigan), a state senator running for the open seat previously held by 68-year-old Gary Peters. Her campaign website is mcmorrowformichigan.com

Zach Wahls (Iowa), a state senator challenging for the U.S. Senate seat, has his campaign website at wahlsforsenate.com 

Good to see some candidates taking a crack at the gerontocracy

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›