this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2026
123 points (96.2% liked)

World News

52854 readers
2468 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Security forces were given free rein to use lethal force during the January 8–9 crackdown to spread fear and deter further protests in Iran, a senior government official said in a closed-door meeting, according to a source familiar with the talks.

The closed-door meeting was held to brief senior government officials and local governors on the brutal crackdown on protesters, the source told Iran International.

The senior official said security forces were given “full authority and a blank check to attack, with the aim of creating maximum fear to deter the resurgence of protests," the source said.

The order, he added, made no distinction between civilians and others.

...

The senior official speaking at the meeting was presenting assessments by security bodies that sharply contradict the government’s official figures on the killings.

While the official death toll stands at nearly 3,000, classified documents and eyewitness reports reviewed by Iran International’s editorial board show that more than 36,500 people were killed during the targeted suppression of Iran’s national uprising on the orders of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.

...

Web archive link

all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] daannii@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

This guy just gunned down 36,500 civilian protestors.

I've been following this story. It's considered the most horrendous death toll of protestors in the history of the world.

I don't think people understand the gravity of this.

And like most Americans, Ive got my hands full with domestic problems.

But 36,500 people. Executed. Children. Grand parents. Neighbors. Entire families.

There are reports the attackers entered hospitals and shot patients in the head.

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 12 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Imagine if Iran sent planes loaded with bombs to the US because of the MN protestors getting killed.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

If the US government killed 36,000 protesters I would probably want them to.

[–] DaMummy@hilariouschaos.com 2 points 8 hours ago

No you wouldn't. Just look at how many Americans die each year due to lack of health care. Then look at how many Americans die due to gun violence. Then look at how many American veterans commit suicide each day. Stop acting like you care, about Iranians or Americans. Or at least start caring instead of raising that veteran suicide number.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

they can't. nobody can.

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 10 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

I'd be s little cautious about those numbers, we all remember WMDs in Iraq and Iraquis throwing babies out of incubators.

Edit: and such statements

[–] Sepia@mander.xyz 8 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

The statements come from an Iranian senior official. He said forces were given

"full authority and a blank check to attack, with the aim of creating maximum fear to deter the resurgence of protests."

And the senior official speaking at the meeting was presenting

assessments by security bodies that sharply contradict the government’s official figures on the killings.

[–] altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

A supposed anonymous iranian senior official as quoted by the website iranintl.com in an article without author's name on it. Are we able to cross-source that claim or have some info about that website, if it's worth it's words? In a situation where your only choice are state's PR agencies and west-facing news outlets, it's weird to unconditionally believe only one of them.

[–] lofuw@sh.itjust.works -1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

Iran massacring its civilians is not an extraordinary claim.

[–] altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

So go on and provide them.

Authoritarian theistic shithole government accepted 3k people dead, so we know that's a real deal and they can't just silence that, alright, and the numbers are obviously over what they claim.

But some source pushes it 10x that, alleges they have some insides from within the house. And I'm not informed if it's a legit media source or on the level of someone's substack. No names there, nothing, even said article got posted without an author's name on it, while they do put these on other articles. In order to trust it, and not just average it with the state's PR team, I need some background, some cred, just something to believe they don't make these up on the spot.

And that got posted three times by a person that gets called out for their overwhelming presence (on their main acc).

Some ordinary evidence would be sufficient in that case.

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io -1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Eye witness reports show Iran is actively trying to disguise the death toll. That puts the burden of proof on Iran that their number is right.

10x doesn't seem too far off. It's like the number of rapes being notoriously higher than the number of reported rapes.

There are a lot of people worried about a large death toll being used to justify foreign intervention. Meanwhile, another uprising in Iran is being put down so their benevolent and wise rulers can hold power for another decade or two.

[–] AlDente@sh.itjust.works 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Do you believe over 700,000 Palestinians have been murdered by Israel?

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io -1 points 14 hours ago

It's not out of the question, given Israel puts the number at 70,000 and stifles independent investigation.

Murder is a loaded term, though.

[–] lofuw@sh.itjust.works -2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Take a remedial English course with an emphasis on rhetoric.

[–] altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] clucose@lemmy.ml 1 points 19 hours ago

That revolution comes at the right time for all turmoil in the US.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

virtually certain.

That and Trump needs a distraction from Epstein.

[–] rayyy@piefed.social -5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Wait, this in Iran? You could forgiven if you thought it was in the US.

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Not really. I get you're using hyperbole here, but this kind of attitude is dangerous.

Scale matters. Every country is guilty of wronging its people. That doesn't make all countries or all acts equal. If you can draw false equivalence between the US and Iran, then you can draw false equivalence between Norway and North Korea.

The US hasn't crushed protests like China and Iran. What the US has done is very bad, but that just makes what's described here as horrific instead.

I had to assume you were referencing the recent ICE killings. If you're a Good Ol' Boy still sore about being on the losing side of the Civil War, then I can see your point.

[–] Doorbook@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)
  • documented foreign interference by CIA
  • long history of documented lies by US media and officials
  • Epstein files with high officials discussion on how to loot countries after revolution before they happen.

Why these countries crush protester?

We didn't kill as much domestic protester as these countries yet