this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2026
146 points (98.0% liked)

politics

27775 readers
2412 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
aidan@lemmy.world
jordanlund@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world
JuBe@lemmy.world
Lasherz12@lemmy.world
146
Former Minnesota governor says state should seek to become part of Canada (www.mlive.com)
submitted 1 day ago by Sine_Fine_Belli@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
39 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/59455315

Former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura says the people of his state should consider leaving the United States. In an interview on the SpinSisters podcast that premiered Saturday, Ventura pitched his plan by saying that it’s clear President Donald Trump doesn’t want the state.

“How about since Trump dislikes Minnesota so bad and we’re so out of control, let’s join Canada. Instead of Canada becoming the 51st state of America and lose their healthcare.... I’d like to see Minnesota, all of us become Canadians,” Ventura said. Make this part of Canada, because it’s obvious Donald Trump don’t want us. It’s obviously he’s ready to fracture the whole country for his own folly."

all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] leadore@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Reading the comments, and disregarding that Ventura was just making a point and not seriously suggesting secession, it seems that people are assuming that Minnesota would simply join Canada as a single unit with the current population as it is.

Obviously that's not what would happen. Canada wouldn't be getting a 47%-magat population in the deal. First, those people wouldn't want to secede or go to Canada. They would move to another state before they'd let that happen. Second, Canada wouldn't just let anyone in just because they were from Minnesota. They'd screen them and decide who to let in. Plus there would be USians from other states trying to move to Minnesota to get in on it. It would be chaotic and messy. Who knows how or if they'd even be able to make it work.

A more likely scenario would be some states seceding, a civil war and major population redistribution, then in the aftermath depending on if the seceding states won independence, maybe a deal with some of them would be made to be annexed by Canada. Or maybe negotiations with certain states would take place during the war regarding future annexation, and Canada might even help them in the war. Who knows.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We don't want it. Minnesota voted 47% for Trump, and the Democrats are a right-wing party too from Canadian perspective, a massive block of far-right voters like this joining Canada would be devastating.

Americans need to sort their own shit out, not come crawling to Canada to do it for them. We've got our own issues to deal with.

[–] MyMindIsLikeAnOcean@piefed.world 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The whole thing is silliness to make a point…like Alberta separation. But…

…I wouldn’t be so sure with this positioning of Minnesotans, or any Americans, so far right of Canada. The American system has been gerrymandered and moved away from democracy in various ways…to the point where the actual people might be more aligned with Canada than you believe.

The only hardcore sticking point, in my estimation, would be guns. It would be a non-starter for too many on both sides.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That 47%-for-Trump figure cannot be explained by gerrymandering, it's a state-wide figure.

Frankly, I'm trying to make a point here too. I'm pointing out how even when Americans are supposedly being "nice" they're often still grounding their niceness in unspoken assumptions of American exceptionalism. A bit of America going "we'll just go join Canada and surely Canada will want to have us" has the same underlying feeling that obviously everyone would like to be American and join America if they could.

[–] MyMindIsLikeAnOcean@piefed.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sure it can…Minnesota and US-wide. Even though voter turnout in that state is relatively high…the last federal election saw higher than average Republican turnout and lower than average Democrat turnout.

Furthermore, voting intentions for Trump have fallen dramatically in Minnesota for obvious reasons…while voting against him has seen almost the same rise.

Additionally, voting for Trump isn’t the same as being conservative…there’s are very large cohorts of people who were for example: low information/previously apolitical, the Trump left, and independents and libertarians…it was a motley coalition.

I’d put actual hard conservative support in Minnesota in the 30-35% range. There are far too many people who would benefit from cheaper and higher quality healthcare and education immediately to maintain a number anywhere near 47%.

It’s not a secret that Republicans and conservatives in general can win elections with these low numbers…and round we go.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The point made above though is that anyone voting Democrat is extremely conservative by Canadian politics too; how many Minnesotans are currently willing to vote independent?

[–] MyMindIsLikeAnOcean@piefed.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I think the reason that Democrats are in trouble is because they don’t represent their voters. There’s a chasm between policy and opinion. That, and they need to win elections by at least 3 and up to 10 points because of how corrupt the US “Democracy” is.

I’m Canadian and I’ve spent some time down in the US…I don’t consider myself to have radically different views…even from many American conservatives…except on a couple wedge issues. The problem, as I see it, isn’t that we’re different…it’s that there are people paying big bucks to convince us that we are.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The fact you don’t at all hnderstand why we wouldn’t want you, aren’t understanding what this person is saying, and seem to want to tell us what the problem is despite us laying out why we don’t like you in very clear language is exactly the kind of bullshit that makes us want to stay far, far away from that garbage.

The US sucks, and even at its best it’s nowhere near even the mediocrity that is Canada. We do not need to tip the scales even further right, we do not need to throw gasoline on the fire.

[–] MyMindIsLikeAnOcean@piefed.world 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

You didn’t engage with anything I wrote and just ranted about what you wanted to reply to.

I’m Canadian…and I stayed no opinions in my reply, just the lay of the land as I see it. I agree that the US sucks, agree that Canada is mediocre and getting worse, and I absolutely do not want Americans joining us…especially the gun nuts, fundamentalists etc.

All I was saying is that we’re a lot closer to each other than all this hyperbole and combative rhetoric would have us believe…Minnesota and isn’t some monolith of conservative boogeymen…they’re mostly nice and reasonable people, and there’s many who would appreciate what makes us better than them.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

You really think the only sticking point is guns? Seriously? I mean, us Canadians are largely politically quite ignorant and most of our knowledge is vibes-based parroting of things our parents said when we were children so fuck it, sure, whatever, dude. And hey, we’re already dumb enough that we see the US and still vote nearly half for PP so there’s that. Maybe MAGA actually would be welcome.

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Look, this was already settled already. How about instead of running from the problems our country is facing we, like idk, actually deal with them. Secession is a chickenshit non-answer.

[–] ChillPenguin@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think of secession as a catalyst more than anything. That's how a civil war starts. The US wouldn't allow it.

I think Minnesota even bringing it up would mean a lot. Why do I have to pay federal taxes for the federal government to occupy our cities.

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today -3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In the US it can be no more than a masturbatory thought experiment. As I said, that was settled, and you know it was bad enough when southern republicans would talk like that with their whole "The South Will Rise Again". No the fuck it won't, but boy will it, and the Republican party in general, let the oldest trick in the CIA handbook for regime change work on them. They fell for a ringer.

Falling to republican talking points and empty threats is a waste of energy that could otherwise be used to do actual good.

[–] ChillPenguin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Sounds like what the British thought before the revolutionary war. When the government stops giving a shit about laws and the constitution. There is going to be a breaking point. In Minnesota we have been following the rules, staying peaceful, yet they have not turned down the occupation.

But eventually that will run out. "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable" -JFK

Empires come and go with time. Look at any point in history.

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Y'all have been done wrong. I'm not arguing that at all. And if the country balkanizes then all bets are off. But if not, we have on record how a state that attempts to secede will be dealt with. Following the rules and staying peaceful isn't going to help you either. One way or another, either in your yard or mine, fighting is going to be with more than words and signs.

[–] ChillPenguin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Agreed. Nobody wins. But right now, our communities and neighbors are being ripped from their homes, walking around streets, in public.

Eventually people will say enough is enough if our state or federal government doesn't change anything. And right now, words and signs don't seem to be doing anything. Just trying to stay hopeful, while I can.

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago

Arm and train while you can too, if you are comfortable owning weapons and can afford to get one. Private sales are best for privacy. If the violence just isn't for you, learn how to give emergency medical care, stopping bleeding, CPR, and the like, and carry what supplies aren't too inconvenient. Hope and effort are all we've got left.

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You might be the most delusional person I’ve read an opinion from on here if you think another civil war and dissolution of the union isn’t possible or even likely this point in time.

Just because “it was settled” in the first civil war doesn’t mean it’s settled now and forever, thats not how anything works at all.

Don’t bother responding I don’t have time for the naive so you’re blocked

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today -2 points 1 day ago

Uh huh.👍✌️

[–] twistypencil@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Eh.. I agree about fighting, but not the chicken shit part

[–] MyMindIsLikeAnOcean@piefed.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean…it’s Jesse Ventura…but it’s hyperbole to make a point, I’d imagine.

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You know I ignored his name entirely. The suggestion makes more sense now.

[–] MyMindIsLikeAnOcean@piefed.world 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah…although he’s often a thoughtful dude and he’s surprisingly knowledgeable about politics…he’ll always be the bloviating sensationalist.

We’re in strange times…and who knows what will happen…but these separation anxieties on both sides of the border are just heightened because of the age we live in.

I spent years in British Columbia, and if you ran in my circles you might actually be convinced that the Cascadia movement had legs, for example. It doesn’t…it just goes to a fever pitch when the other people are in charge.

[–] chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago

Jesse "The body" Ventura may be my favorite Alex Jones guest (in that he actually tells Jones that a bunch of his ideas don't work in actual governance and gave some surprisingly reasonable takes) but I'm still not sure he's a reasonable person to quote. Also on the competition for favorite guest, Alex Jones once accidentally got a really sweet Astronaut to call in who really just wanted to talk about how awesome space and science were, and wouldn't go down any conspiracy rabbit holes. He didn't actually know who Jones was but wanted to spread a lovely message. Had a cut message from his daughter or granddaughter too (it was oddly unclear).

[–] whereIsTamara@lemmy.org 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Lmfao, goodbye Alberta, hello Minnesota, Washington, Oregon, California…

[–] thlibos@thelemmy.club 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I could see Canada allowing a single state with only 5 million-ish people like Minnesota become a part of Manitoba or a new province if that was less problematic. No way they are going to take on Minnesota, Washington, Oregon, and California and suddenly make themselves a 1/3 minority in their own country.

[–] whereIsTamara@lemmy.org 1 points 12 hours ago

I suppose that’s true. Besides, California would never want to join anyone

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Canada could do the first three. California wouldn't work though. California and Canada have populations that are about equal. It wouldn't be California joining Canada, it would be California and Canada merging to form one new country. MN, WA, and OR could join Canada without completely upending the demographics of the country. But if all of these states joined, and Alberta left, a comfortable majority of Canada's entire population would be citizens of former US states. That's just the US annexing Canada by another name.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Unfortunately USA is not a free country, and secession is illegal.
History shows that military force will be used in case states try to secede.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

It's very easy for secession to be legal. You just have to have the federal government on board with it. Someone could absolutely run for president on a platform of, "I'll let states secede from the union. If you want to go, I won't stop you." What SCOTUS says is irrelevant. If the president simply refused to send in the military to suppress any rebellion, secession would be fully legal.

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago

no new england called it first

[–] MyMindIsLikeAnOcean@piefed.world 3 points 1 day ago

It’s no more silly than Alberta joining the US.

[–] Eldritch_Alyx@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If states start to secede, the administration will be forced to face reality. Tear shitlers kingdom apart.

[–] whereIsTamara@lemmy.org 2 points 1 day ago

They won’t. They’ll just declare martial law and make Minnesota an actual war zone.

[–] h4x0r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

Just another indicator that those with the power to lead will do anything except fight back.

[–] Tugboater203@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I do enjoy the idea, but I feel we have to call it out just like we do every time Texas talks about leaving. This issue has been settled (violently).

If you get a majority of the northern population centers and economies to seceed it would be more feasible, but it would result in an actual shooting civil war. One state (with the exception of California) isn't enough to go it alone.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

This issue has been settled (violently).

It hasn't been settled at all. All it would take for secession to be legal and an available option would be for someone to get elected president on a platform of "I'll let states secede." That's literally all it would take. If the person commanding the military just refuses to use it to put down a secession, secession will happen.

[–] faraiwe@mstdn.social -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

@Sine_Fine_Belli I mean, Mn is already colder than anything reasonably habitable... at this point, why not?

#TurdReich #Minnesota #Canada #USPol

[–] Quilotoa@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Remember, when the northern part of Minnesota ends, the southern part of Canada begins and Canada is the world's prefered choice for immigration. Other things are more important than climate.