this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2026
181 points (100.0% liked)

News

36994 readers
1449 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 52 points 2 months ago (1 children)

None of them want to say it, so they're making excuses.

Sales are plunging. The poors are broke, and have stopped buying crap they don't need.

It's not going to get better anytime soon, either.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't know if there's less UPS shipping done by Amazon, but Amazon sales are okay.

https://www.marketplacepulse.com/stats/amazon-north-america-sales

searches

It sounds like it's more to do with the fact that Amazon built out its own delivery infrastructure and had been giving the less-desirable deliveries to UPS.

https://www.inc.com/jason-aten/7-words-explain-why-ups-is-cutting-amazon-loose/91145555

For Amazon and UPS, the relationship started to change during the 2013 holiday season after a meltdown of the UPS shipping network led to millions of gifts not arriving in time for Christmas. The debacle spurred Amazon to accelerate the build-out of its own delivery network to reduce its reliance on third-party shippers like UPS.

Estimates suggest that Amazon has spent well over $100 billion to build out its own network. As a result, it delivers the majority of orders itself, leaving outside carriers to deliver less profitable packages.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 7 points 2 months ago

I will say... Using total dollars spent without adjusting for inflation means that every year/quarter will look like the best year as long as something catastrophic hasn't happened.

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago (5 children)

I’m not sure I understand. UPS delivers packages for money. They don’t want to deliver small packages for any amount of money?

How long until FedEx does the same? Amazon has never delivered to my rural address. I guess if you’re out of range you’re just SOL?

[–] nixienox@piefed.social 36 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I was told we don't need USPS because corporations are better in every way and blah blah blah. Now we need USPS to get packages again?

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Even usps can’t deliver to rural addresses. They deliver to line of boxes at the highway intersection which get ran over or broken into monthly.

Instead you either get a card to pick up the packages at the usps office, or you skip the broken-into mailbox and get a pobox.

Amazon.com needs to chill and get rid of their delivery services due to their anti-competitive nature.

[–] whereIsTamara@lemmy.org 2 points 2 months ago

Amazon will choose what is most profitable

[–] kurmudgeon@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Amazon has become a competitor to UPS since they started their own delivery services. This lead to UPS cutting ties with Amazon. I guess Amazon will have to complete the rollout of their own delivery services to your area and others like yours.

[–] finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

A drone hovers over your remote country home. Is it Amazon delivering a package? Is it an enthusiastic hobbyist with a voyeurism fetish? Is it a particularly modern version of religious hawkers? Is it the New York Times seeking subscriptions? Is it ICE?

Could be anything.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I just thought about how these drones will be full of cameras and controlled by Jeff Bezos, who probably ate dinner with Trump last night, and who also owns Ring, a company that shares your camera footage with the government. Imagine if Flock partners with them too and they have drones flying everywhere recording 24/7 with facial recognition and license plate readers with everything feeding to our facist leader.

[–] acme401@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Imagine if Flock partners with them too

Dude....I hate to tell you... straight from Flock themselves

https://www.flocksafety.com/blog/flock-safety-and-ring-partner-to-help-neighborhoods-work-together-for-safer-communities

[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

Well what ever it is I'm goanna launch a rock at it with a slingshot!

[–] tal@lemmy.today 2 points 2 months ago

"With Amazon DTS (drone time-sharing), it could be all the above! Using the same logic as AWS, we realized that there were savings to be had in making hardware shared at scale!"

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's not that UPS doesn'twant to deliver small packages, it's that the Amazon deliveries are extremely small profit for them. Both because Amazon doesn't pay that much for delivery, and because Amazon deliberately offloads the most expensive deliveries (like rural addresses) to rival companies.

You're not SoL yet as the USPS is mandated to deliver to every address in the country; you may be SoL if they ever finally manage to privatize the Post Office.

[–] pillowtags@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago

USPS actually does not deliver to all addresses, there are places that are PO Box only!

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

You expect profitable deliveries to subsidize your rural living choice.

I'm sure Amazon has some locker delivery that you can also choose.

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Honestly they don’t. Used to be a rite aid but they went out of business.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 2 months ago

depends if the item is too large it can be a problem.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 2 points 2 months ago

My guess is Amazon is pouring money into it and lowering prices so much that it's not profitable for UPS. Once UPS and FedEx stop competing with them Amazon will be a monopoly and will rise praises to whatever it wants.

[–] turdburglar@piefed.social 10 points 2 months ago

ok. so please join the fuck-amazon-buy-it-from-a-human-club.