We have been in contact about this with the feddit.org admins, but there isn't really a whole lot we can do about it and IMHO at least for now it is relatively benign since the articles posted are just links to normal news outlets.
this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2026
59 points (100.0% liked)
Europe
9009 readers
1231 users here now
News and information from Europe πͺπΊ
(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)
Rules (2024-08-30)
- This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
- No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
- Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
- No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
- Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
- If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
- Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
- Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
- No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
- Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.
(This list may get expanded as necessary.)
Posts that link to the following sources will be removed
- on any topic: Al Mayadeen, brusselssignal:eu, citjourno:com, europesays:com, Breitbart, Daily Caller, Fox, GB News, geo-trends:eu, news-pravda:com, OAN, RT, sociable:co, any AI slop sites (when in doubt please look for a credible imprint/about page), change:org (for privacy reasons), archive:is,ph,today (their JS DDoS websites)
- on Middle-East topics: Al Jazeera
- on Hungary: Euronews
Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com
(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)
Ban lengths, etc.
We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.
If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.
If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
For now.
Can we put up rules like accounts must first be x amount of days old with comments and maybe some upvotes or something before they can start posting articles?
They are basically already being banned (by the Feddit.org admins) as soon as they start posting. An additional unenforcable rule wouldn't make a difference.
I have actually noticed, and was also considering asking about this. 2 observations from my point.
-
The new users with a stream of posts comments in the last dayβ¦I think I have noticed them more as they seem to have a higher rate of profile pics. Lemmy does not seem big on profile pics so that stood out to me. I could likely be wrong.
-
More new users littering sarky or rude comments to start argumentative behaviour. Itβs not even on hot topics either, itβs more subtle posts. Itβs a bit odd as Lemmy is usually pretty friendly.
We are trying to figure out a solution that wont negatively affect genuine users. Issue is that due to certain limitations at the moment finding a solution is difficult. So all we can do is what we have done so far: ban suspicious new accounts that only spam posts into news communities without interaction.
Is Lemmy important enough to attract bots with malicious political intentions? A victory for us.
On a more serious note, I don't know of any truly effective way to prevent that beyond sheer, hard work and restraint, and even then it's never easy to distinguish bad intention of legitimate dissenting opinions.
It's not even as if they express opinions. They only post links (usually of articles). 10 to 30 of them before abandoning the accounts. Why the throwaway accounts?
It's not even as if they express opinions. They only post links (usually of articles). 10 to 30 of
Exactly, most bonafide nornal new users , usually reacts in several communities within the 1 -2 weeks minimum, before they make a post.
Happy to hear @Emopunker@feddit.org you guys are keeping an eye on this finally. Its been going on for a while, and I have reported this issue to you on occasion the last weeks especially.
These user(s) move to other communities/instances once they get to banned too often in one. Then Usually, after some weeks or a month they circle back to the first, and so on.
As community users, we can report those clear cut post & run users and don't react to their post to (maybe) discourage them. Their profile and behiavour is pretty obvious, so they can be recognised. At the same time, I encourage the community to be welcoming to bonafide new users ofcourse.
On another matter, will you consider informing the community after you made adjustments or updates to the workings of the Rules ( like recently with the archive. today) for example? I had posted this question some days ago. thnaks
When we come to a decision on it, we will inform the users about it.
Great, tnx
Are the news articles paywalled/ad supported/propagandistic?
Perhaps someone just trying to get more views to those sites?
Then why does has the person abandoned dozens of accounts for the past few months instead of consistently posting on the same account?
It has been an issue since at least two months ago first starting on lemmy.world
Because they know they are being disingenuous and jump to another account before someone takes an action against that account.
Not sure but maybe chaos and confusion is one of their ban evading tactic.
Might even be just multiple people getting paid a bit, by said news sites.
Maybe it is turning out to be cheaper for the news site owners than ads on Google etc.
In Germany, we used to put an ASCII art fish for trolls, because they were troll-fishing:
><xX))))o>
That was advising others not to react to them/ Maybe we should use something similar for clanker-bots ?
Anything is game to push once narrative
We all have a narrative and try to convince others; that's what dialogue in forums is all about. The difference is whether it's done in good faith, trying to debate, learn and share, or in bad faith, diverting, deceiving and pushing misleading debates to promote hidden ideas.
It is not always easy to distinguish one from another, and organized groups take advantage of that.
They are not writing any comments though and if then it is only posting links.
Or bots are just that cheap.
probably bad actors pushing false news.
in regards to 'not interacting with new users', I think that's a bad idea. how will any community/server/instance grow if you never reply or interact with new accounts?
so long as the mods block the obvious trolls/bots/bad actors, I see no reason in why you, or anyone should be avoiding new account interactions.
if you see something nefarious, report it, block them yourself and move along. Let the mods do what they are already doing.
in regards to 'not interacting with new users', I think that's a bad idea. how will any community/server/instance grow if you never reply or interact with new accounts?
I mean, they are pretty easy to spot. They are new accounts that instantly drop several news posts. That is not organic human behaviour.
I personally haven't seen or experienced it, however I haven't been actively looking though. hopefully they can implement something to mitigate the issues
Honestly itβs gotten so bad that anyone with an account older than 10 days that mass posts is starting to look super suspicious to me.
Accounts have been popping up, posting and deleting themselves while leaving the posts up. There is no way to block those shitheads as a user.
Really would like a client side block on seeing any posts from accounts older than a certain number of days.
hmm didn't think it was that bad. yeah that feature might be half decent if someone was able to implement it and could mitigate a bunch of nonsense posts like you're describing
Really would like a client side block on seeing any posts from accounts older than a certain number of days.
Use Voyager app or Tesseract if you like, they have filters you can set. Lemmy devs can't or won't do anything about it for now. Maybe next update afaik .
What I do is not engage with new accounts unless they comment.
I do use Voyager but all you get is a tag that itβs a new account and not a filter on all accounts under a certain age.
Even just a filter for all accounts less than 2 days old would be enough to get rid of the spam accounts that get deleted.
I use summit and you can set it up to show how old an account is ( it's displayed prominently besides the username ), if it's younger than 30 days.
Mm. heard of that one before .. Any good?
Coming from reddit, i continued using Sync. When the dev went MIA again lately, i tried lots of clients and summit really stood out.
Imo it's the client that uses all of lemmy's available functions to full extent and enhances the mobile experience with lots of cool features of its own.
Those are the obvious ones. There are also less obvious ones. For example, if an account exclusively posts and hardly ever makes comments, then there's something very wrong.
I disagree here - there are a lot of people around here who are not posting comments and that is a totally normal behavior. We know from every forum around there that there are a lot of lurkers who are only reading. There are fewer people who are only liking/upvoting. And then there are fewer people participating and some of them are just submitting links. That's normal. So let's not assume that everybody who is just submitting some links into a community is a bot.
(And it is quite easy in the age of LLMs to build a bot that is also posting some random comments like "Great article, thank you". Account age will also not help as a bad actor can easily create some accounts and let them "age" by simply not using them for a month or so)
Are these bad actors? Because who hasn't build a twitter-bot or a discord-bot ik their day?
It's not trivial, but I'm starting to think so. Take this user for example:
https://vger.to/sh.itjust.works/u/Valleci
There are some neutral posts, but many rage-bait articles from a very shitty news source concentrating on this community.