this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2026
479 points (96.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

39543 readers
1193 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Oh dont worry, the earth will still spin. Life will go on.

Humans are fucking this up for themselves and wont be missed. [Beep boop, im not a robot]

[–] bitcrafter@programming.dev 2 points 5 hours ago

It is a little weird that this had never occurred to you until it popped into your head during a shower, but better late than never!

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Exactly. These creatures ARE our only real problem. More-less everything else, we could solve if they just...

...stopped being alive.

[–] mudkip 4 points 8 hours ago

We must take matters into our own hands.

[–] mo_lave@reddthat.com 2 points 6 hours ago

The love of money is the root of all evil

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 12 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

"most"?

Try "all". Everything always eventually comes down to someone, somewhere, trying to make more profit for themselves.

That's why "Follow the money" is the surest way to solve any crime.

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

More precisely "follow the money" is the surest way to understand why a crime is not being prosecuted

[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

Money. We need a new system of commerce. The quest for even more money is the longest problem we refuse to look at in human history. Excessive greed should be punished not aspired to. All we seem to do is turn to rich people for answers like they've figured out the world, when in fact they ignore the world and supplant a system called "the economy" over actual reality. We make goods and send them there to buy back their goods from over there to make people in the middle rich for doing nothing. Completely ignoring health, safety, the environment in the process, things that are real in the real world that we all experience and affect us. Make it make sense to me.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

One could argue that the currency system itself legitimizes the amassing of enormous wealth into the hands of a tiny minority.

[–] ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

This planet has - or rather had - a problem, which was this: most of the people living on it were unhappy for pretty much of the time. Many solutions were suggested for this problem, but most of these were largely concerned with the movement of small green pieces of paper, which was odd because on the whole it wasn't the small green pieces of paper that were unhappy.

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago

"the only minority group destroying our country are billionaires" as the bumper sticker on my therapists's car says... love her

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 hours ago

capitalism. capitalism causes most of the misery in the world.

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

If money didn't exist there would still be a small group of people vying for power and the belief that they should rule over the rest or us. Money just made it easier.

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 25 points 17 hours ago

image

Class conflict is a problem for much of human existence.

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 13 points 16 hours ago

Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

[–] asg101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 36 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

“The Earth is not dying, it is being killed, and those who are killing it have names and addresses.”

Utah Phillips

The deaths from climate change related Ice storms, floods, fires, heat waves and droughts are not due to "catastrophes", or "disasters" they are calculated, premeditated murders for profit.

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

"These people have physical bodies" - Jreg

[–] Illogicalbit@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

“Absolute power corrupts absolutely”

[–] vane@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

Sharing is caring

[–] shittydwarf@piefed.social 54 points 1 day ago (20 children)

Hunting billionaires for sport would make the world immeasurably better in every way

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] chunes@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

don't underestimate the misery caused by idiopathic disease.

[–] presoak@lazysoci.al 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think of giant monsters. Kaiju.

A normal ant is no problem. An ant the size of a skyscraper is a problem.

Money is the size here. A human with a billion dollars is a giant monster kaiju.

It ain't the species it's the size.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LemmyBruceLeeMarvin@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 18 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

The bourgeoisie do not receive a wage. They receive our wages in the form of profit. If a maximum wage was introduced in the current system it would be made to benefit the bourgeois as they are the ones writing our laws.

[–] HaiZhung@feddit.org 8 points 21 hours ago

We need a wealth tax, is what you want to say. Tax wealth not work.

[–] veni_vedi_veni@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They don't get wealth from labor, it's all about owning the shit that gets them wealth.

And even then, they don't sell it to buy things, they use it as leverage to spend the banks' money.

So it's really about taxing dividends, and any loans gained from leveraging assets.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 17 points 1 day ago (4 children)

They are the symptoms, not the disease. Capitalism will always create them on a long enough timeline. It is streamlined feudalism.

If you have any type of head start under capitalism, for any reason, regardless if everyone profits, those who initially profited a little more will profit exponentially more at an exponential rate as time goes by.

The claim is that under capitalism, everybody is better off. But if they earn 1.1 times as much as you do, as the years turn into decades into centuries, you will have earned a fraction of what they did. That difference matters a lot, especially at scale.

If I get $1 and you get $100, that's a big difference between us, but not life changing for either.

If I get $1000 and you get $100000, that is a massive difference between us, trivial for me, definitely significant for you.

If I have $100000 and you have $10000000, we might as well live on different planets.

Capitalism doesn't take this into consideration. Sorry for the somewhat juvenile example, I'm very tired, and am going to have another drink now.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Your example isn’t bad. You could go further. 1,000,000 vs 1,000,000,000. Massive difference.

The problem is when we live in a world when we have millions of people with less than $1,000, and others have more than $300,000,000,000.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 4 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Here's another problematic aspect of the same-

In 1913 there were 435 representatives in Congress. The population of the United States was ~97 million.

In 2026 there are still 435 representatives. The population is about ~335 million.

In 1913 each representative spoke for roughly 223,000 people.

In 2026 each representative speaks for roughly 770,000 people.

In 1789 there were 65 representatives, and about 4 million people, speaking for ~60,500 people each.

Scale matters, a lot.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›