this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2026
290 points (100.0% liked)

News

37153 readers
1637 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 102 points 2 months ago (6 children)

The agents involved in the Pretti shooting were part of the Border Patrol Tactical Unit, an elite specialized force, McLaughlin said.

“Elite” yeah ok.

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 44 points 2 months ago (2 children)

And what border were they patrolling?

[–] zikzak025@lemmy.world 79 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This looks more like the coverage maps Verizon would display in television commercials.

[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

And both are basically just population density maps anyway

[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

All that red is mostly empty space/farmland. It's not what it appears. Land doesn't get to vote.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It literally does in America.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip -5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Not really. The political entity of a state gets to vote yes, and that does lead to different ratios of senators per person/electoral college votes per person (house representation is divided by population but minimum representation still skews it).

For example Alaska is the largest state, but in terms of population it ranks 48th. Meaning per person in the Senate it has more power per person than say California. However then you have a state like Vermont that is the 49th most populous state and ranks at 45th in size. Lower land area and population than Alaska. And yet it does have more representation per person in the Senate than Alaska. So it's not land that votes, it's states. Ironically the Senate was set up so "smaller" states like Rhode Island wouldn't get outvoted by larger states like "Virginia". Then since population densities were so much lower the larger a state was generally correlated with a larger population (more space to farm means it can support more people). Then the American west happened.

This of course also effects the electoral college, but that is divided up by population per state. The issue is each state must have a minimum number once again leading to lower population states getting more say per person.

And while yes this seems like it needs to reformed, the current events unfolding with ICE does make me want individual states to be stronger and have more authority to push back against the government. Then again if we voted strictly by population we likely wouldn't be in this mess either

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Funny to hear "voting by population" as phrase that appears to be intended to obfuscate the fact that it means "just counting the votes" like literally every other democracy does.

Also, Vermont actually has exactly the same representation in the senate and house despite a higher population than Alaska, this example supports my statement, not yours.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

That wasn't my intention. I wasn't trying to obfuscate anything. I said it that way to directly point to the reality that it is not done the way every other democratic county does it. Honestly jumping to "he's trying to deceive me!" is aggressive and doesn't give me hope this will be a productive conversation

Anyway, this is why I said senate representation per person. Since every state gets 2 Senators per state, regardless of population or land area, this means states with lower populations get the same level of representation. Without doing a ton of math this late in the evening let's say in California it's 1 senator per 15 million people. In Vermont its 1 senator per 300,000 people. That in effect is more representation per person. Same thing applies to the electoral college since states get a minimum number of electoral college votes.

And yeah the same representation for Vermont and Alaska proves my point actually. It's not based on size its based on state. It's not land voting its the state that votes. If land voted Alaska would have more representatives than Vermont.

Honestly this isn't even a disagreement to your main point. Electoral power in the US is not distributed by population. This is 100% true. It's just that it's divided up by state, not by land mass.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

It sure fucking does.

44 million Californians have the same number of senators as a herd of buffalo in Wyoming.

[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 6 points 2 months ago

The intelect border?

[–] slothrop@lemmy.ca 25 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"Elite" yeah ok.

2 of them almost got into high school!

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

They score in the top percentile for being scared of their own shadows

[–] lemmylommy@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 months ago

Meal team 6

[–] coaxil@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 months ago

Gravy seals!

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Elite? Parody of elite. Wannabe elite. Caricature of elite. Gravy Seal Elite.

[–] UnrefinedChihuahua@lemmy.dbzer0.com 54 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Fatal killing. As opposed to...non-fatal killing? Who gets paid to write this shit.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 months ago

Nobody, it’s AI slop presumably.

[–] comrade_twisty@feddit.org 54 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Are we gonna get an AI generated bodycam video that completely contradicts all cellphone videos next?

[–] lividweasel@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Nope. The only copy of the video will be involved in an unfortunate technical incident and will be lost permanently.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago

A falsified contradiction would be worse.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

it's only a matter of time

[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago

....which the public will surely never see.

Nor do we need to because, you fucking idiots, your actions are recorded in detail from six angles (and counting)

[–] tyrant@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What can the show us that we haven't seen from the multiple angles of videos? Pretti steps between a woman and an agent, gets sprayed with pepper spray, is wrestled to the ground by multiple agents, they seem to remove his legally carried gun and walk away, then they kill him. It's not a single shot. It's not a burst of shots. It's one shot, a moment of silence, then many other shots to ensure death.

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

He emptied the clip.

[–] RotatingParts@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Release the video ... and the Epstein files.

[–] rayyy@piefed.social 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

ICE is a also a diversion from the Epstein files which would bring the orange pedophile down, and he knows the Epstein files will do that. All stops are pulled to keep the Epstein files secret. He desperately moves to instill fear and chaos as a cover and delay tactic.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago

Trump will be rounding us all up into fucking camps and you'll say it's a distraction from the Epstein files.

[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago

Comments like these are brain dead. Project 2025 is the goal. They do not five half a shit about the Epstein Files.

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 17 points 2 months ago

We don’t need to see that.

We know he was not brandishing a weapon. He wasn’t impeding ICE. He was asking them not to push a woman to the ground and recording them.

He wasn’t resisting arrest. He was trying to protect his head and body from getting beaten. He was unarmed when he was executed.

What more do you need? Fuck ICE.

[–] Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

Wait. There's even more proof?

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago
[–] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

I would not trust it. Not with AI being a thing.

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago