this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2026
287 points (100.0% liked)

News

34584 readers
3123 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 44 points 2 days ago (2 children)

And what border were they patrolling?

[–] zikzak025@lemmy.world 79 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This looks more like the coverage maps Verizon would display in television commercials.

[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

And both are basically just population density maps anyway

[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

All that red is mostly empty space/farmland. It's not what it appears. Land doesn't get to vote.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It literally does in America.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip -5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Not really. The political entity of a state gets to vote yes, and that does lead to different ratios of senators per person/electoral college votes per person (house representation is divided by population but minimum representation still skews it).

For example Alaska is the largest state, but in terms of population it ranks 48th. Meaning per person in the Senate it has more power per person than say California. However then you have a state like Vermont that is the 49th most populous state and ranks at 45th in size. Lower land area and population than Alaska. And yet it does have more representation per person in the Senate than Alaska. So it's not land that votes, it's states. Ironically the Senate was set up so "smaller" states like Rhode Island wouldn't get outvoted by larger states like "Virginia". Then since population densities were so much lower the larger a state was generally correlated with a larger population (more space to farm means it can support more people). Then the American west happened.

This of course also effects the electoral college, but that is divided up by population per state. The issue is each state must have a minimum number once again leading to lower population states getting more say per person.

And while yes this seems like it needs to reformed, the current events unfolding with ICE does make me want individual states to be stronger and have more authority to push back against the government. Then again if we voted strictly by population we likely wouldn't be in this mess either

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Funny to hear "voting by population" as phrase that appears to be intended to obfuscate the fact that it means "just counting the votes" like literally every other democracy does.

Also, Vermont actually has exactly the same representation in the senate and house despite a higher population than Alaska, this example supports my statement, not yours.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That wasn't my intention. I wasn't trying to obfuscate anything. I said it that way to directly point to the reality that it is not done the way every other democratic county does it. Honestly jumping to "he's trying to deceive me!" is aggressive and doesn't give me hope this will be a productive conversation

Anyway, this is why I said senate representation per person. Since every state gets 2 Senators per state, regardless of population or land area, this means states with lower populations get the same level of representation. Without doing a ton of math this late in the evening let's say in California it's 1 senator per 15 million people. In Vermont its 1 senator per 300,000 people. That in effect is more representation per person. Same thing applies to the electoral college since states get a minimum number of electoral college votes.

And yeah the same representation for Vermont and Alaska proves my point actually. It's not based on size its based on state. It's not land voting its the state that votes. If land voted Alaska would have more representatives than Vermont.

Honestly this isn't even a disagreement to your main point. Electoral power in the US is not distributed by population. This is 100% true. It's just that it's divided up by state, not by land mass.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

It sure fucking does.

44 million Californians have the same number of senators as a herd of buffalo in Wyoming.

[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 6 points 2 days ago

The intelect border?