Nah, too cold. It stopped moving and the computer can't generate any more random numbers to pick from the LLM's weighted suggestions.
this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2026
316 points (97.3% liked)
Programmer Humor
28738 readers
901 users here now
Welcome to Programmer Humor!
This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!
For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.
Rules
- Keep content in english
- No advertisements
- Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
O cholera, czy to Freddy Fazbear?
If you have ever read the "thought" process on some of the reasoning models you can catch them going into loops of circular reasoning just slowly burning tokens. I'm not even sure this isn't by design.
Why would it be by design? What does that even mean in this context?
You have to pay for tokens on many of the "AI" tools that you do not run on your own computer.
Compute costs?
I dunno, let's waste some water
They are trying to get rid of us by wasting our resources.
So, it's Nestlé behind things again.
I'm pretty sure training is purely result oriented so anything that works goes
Exactly why this shit is and will never be trustworthy.
Attack of the logic gates.
What happend here?
LLMs work by picking the next word* as the most likely candidate word given its training and the context. Sometimes it gets into a situation where the model's view of "context" doesn't change when the word is picked, so the next word is just the same. Then the same thing happens again and around we go. There are fail-safe mechanisms to try and prevent it but they don't work perfectly.
*Token
That was the answer I was looking for. So it's simmolar to "seahorse" emoji case, but this time.at some point he just glitched that most likely next world for this sentence is "or" and after adding the "or" is also "or" and after adding the next one is also "or", and after a 11th one... you may just as we'll commit. Since thats the same context as with 10.
Thanks!
He?
This is not a person and does not have a gender.
Chill dude. It's a grammatical/translation error, not an ideological declaration. Especially common mistake if of your native language have "grammatical gender". "Spoon" is a "she" in my language, but im not proposing to any one soon. Not all hills are worth nitpicking on.
I've got it once in a "while it is not" "while it is" loop.
It's like the text predictor on your phone. If you just keep hitting the next suggested word, you'll usually end up in a loop at some point. Same thing here, though admittedly much more advanced.
Example of my phone doing this.
I just want you are the only reason that you can't just forget that I don't have a way that I have a lot to the word you are not even going on the phone and you can call it the other way to the other one I know you are going out to talk about the time you are not even in a good place for the rest they'll have a little bit more mechanically and the rest is.
You can see it looping pretty damned quick with me just hitting the first suggestion after the initial I.
Gemini evolved into a seal.
or simply, or
LLM showed its true nature, probabilistic bullshit generator that got caught in a strange attractor of some sort within its own matrix of lies.
Unmentioned by other comments: The LLM is trying to follow the rule of three because sentences with an "A, B and/or C" structure tend to sound more punchy, knowledgeable and authoritative.
Yes, I did do that on purpose.
Not only that, but also "not only, but also" constructions, which sound more emphatic, conclusive, and relatable.
I used to think learning stylistic devices like this was just an idle fancy, a tool simply designed to analyse poems, one of the many things you're most certain you'll never need but have to learn in school.
What a fool I've been.
Turned into a sea lion
or
This is gold
Platinum, even. Star Platinum.
I don't see no 'a's between those 'or's for the full "ora ora ora ora" effect.