All talk. Let's see the action.
this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2026
209 points (99.5% liked)
politics
27380 readers
4046 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Most Democratic senators’ word is about as trustworthy as a Republican’s word.
Only action matters at this point; anything else will be considered lies and half truths.
Oh, you can take Republicans at their word. Most of what they committed to doing, they are doing. It's just that what they committed to doing (Project 2025), is evil as fuck.
I'll believe it when I see it
But what will you do until hell freezes over? That'll be a long wait!
Technically, Hell is exothermic. 🤷🏼♂️
I'll believe it when I see it
One murder wasn't enough. Or countless kidnappings. Or masses of documented cruelty and illegality. But two murders? TWO? Now that's where I draw the line. Verbally. In the moment. Hopefully you don't remember my actual vote when it comes time to reelect me. You never have before.
They'll vow until it's time to vote.
They really wanted to block the vote, but the Parliamentarian said they couldn't. Rules are rules.
The parliamentarian is there as an advisory position, they have no authority and Congress can choose to ignore their recommendations.
Can the Senate Ignore the Parliamentarian’s Advice? Yes. The presiding officer can choose to ignore the advice of the parliamentarian on any matter they choose, which has happened several times before.
The parliamentarian exists to advise the chamber on existing procedures, but it is the presiding officer’s duty to make rulings. However, any senator may raise a point of order challenging the ruling of the presiding officer for not following the correct procedure. The dispute would then be put to a vote of the chamber. Ultimately, senators themselves are responsible for deciding the outcome of all parliamentary questions, even if they go against standing rules and precedent.
https://bipartisanpolicy.org/explainer/what-is-the-role-of-the-senate-parliamentarian/
And this time they pinky swear that they mean it!
We don't need strongly worded letters. We need a insurrection.
No, no they won’t. But it makes for a nice soundbite for the gullible masses.
Remember to vote in your primary elections please.
Heh. Like we're gonna have "elections". 🫡
Didn't they say this last time?
People are starting to realise they're full of it.
No. They're not realizing shit. Step away from the Copium. 🤢
I just PTSD-envisioned Schumer looking sternly down his glasses while rubber-stamping yet another MIC bill.
Yeah I suppose it is worth focusing on the Democrats when all this is clearly due to tacit Republican support every step of the way.
If they renege on this then we absolutely need to primary every dem senator. We need something to show this party that empty gestures aren't enough anymore.