this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2026
201 points (100.0% liked)

politics

27335 readers
2570 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As the Times noted, he said that “he regretted not ordering the National Guard to seize voting machines in swing states after his loss in the 2020 election.”


As the Times observed, “Mr. Trump’s expression of regret … was ... a warning sign that he had not given up on the idea that voting machines were dangerous or that they could be seized in an effort to curb fraud.” We should take that warning seriously.

So far, the leaders of the Democratic party have not. They have focused on mobilizing to compete successfully in November, but have done little to ensure the election is not rigged through executive action, intimidation, or interference with vote counting.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fyrilsol@kbin.melroy.org 34 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This was how you lost 2016. This was how you lost 2024.

This is how you're going to lose 2026 and probably 2028.

You fucking morons.

[–] areakode@riskeratspizza.com 18 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It's almost as if the system is working as intended...

I'm so sick of voting for the least evil. Democrats slowly move things to the left while carefully following the law. Then Republicans come in and smash everything with a sledgehammer.

Revolution is pretty much inevitable. If we can't get what we need to survive legally, it isn't going to be very fun for anyone.

[–] HermitBee@feddit.uk 12 points 1 day ago

Democrats slowly move things to the left while carefully following the law.

Are you looking at the same country I'm looking at? From the outside it looks like they're a right wing party being dragged gradually rightwards by a far right wing party.

[–] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago

Democrats as a party have never shifted things to the left, they talk one thing while tossing us stale table scraps then vote like Republicans. That's how they've gone from people like Jimmy Carter to denying a genocide, that they are paying for, is occuring. If we overlaid today's political scale with the political scale from 1980, Democrats would be to the far right of Ronald Reagan. 40 years of liberal "lesser evil" has actually been incremental fascism

[–] fyrilsol@kbin.melroy.org 6 points 1 day ago

Democrats just come in wagging their finger all like "Now now now, you know that was a bad bad thing to do, Republicans. We're going to pussy-foot around the law and not make as radical of a change as you did. We're going to stagnate and follow the law, taking our time to clean up your mess you bad little boy" in a very motherly tone.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

The revenge will feel cathartic though.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

I mean, 2025 elections were a +15 D landslide in New Jersey and Virginia. Nevermind the municipal races.

But the people Dems ended up electing (Governors Mikie Sherrill and Abigail Spanberger) were, for the most part, the same corporate schlubs and military apparatchiks that have been dragging the party down for decades.

Less the problem of "losing", I see a problem of Dems "winning" with a wave of Henry Cuellars and Marie Gluesenkamp Perezes, then folding right in alongside the "moderate Republican" block that's been doing Trumpism via the US Congress for the last 40 years.

[–] 1orangecat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's by design, the current corporate Democrats have to show some effort of resistance but is rigged to lose in the end.

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

Exactly. You have to give the people just enough hope to think things might change but without actually doing anything. The Democrats are very good at it. They've been doing it for a long time.

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The Democratic primaries need to be an absolute bloodbath this year. Unfortunately Schumer is with us until 2028, so we'll probably mostly be dead or he will by then.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He could be fired as leader though. Make that a campaign issue for any Senate race.

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Could doesn't really apply to good things in politics, but I appreciate your optimism. He will in all likelihood step down peacefully if he's not gunned down first. Maybe a massive progressive wave could change that, but I think it'd be a big ask even if that happened this year. It'd have to be multiple elections worth of progressive waves I think. Given the growing special interests in democratic primaries, I think the real fight is going to be out front in most of these cases.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The primary comes first, and it's the first time we'll have fair primaries in decades....

But you never give up on plan A till plan A fails, that doesn't mean it's the only plan.

Oligarchs are desperate for Americans to hand over freedom in the hopes of security, they want us to pre-emptively coalesce around a neoliberal and focus on how they're not as bad as trump.

The most important step to beating trump, is getting a charismatic candidate with popular policy to the general.

[–] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

The most important step is beating fascism, which includes Democrats and Republicans. Our current conditions did not rise in a vacuum, fascism cannot become a dominant force without the complicity of a weak liberal party. Only focusing on Trump, who is a single cog in the machine, will result in nothing changing. Liberals are focused on the emperor when they should be focusing on the Empire

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Democrat leadership doesn't care if they win or lose elections. They'll all be rich and comfortable regardless. So they drag their feet and pretend to be the opposition party but in reality they are in a limbo contest with their friends on the other side of the isle.

This isn't about a purity test. It's about putting the right person in charge. Hakeem Jeffries and Schumer don't care about your issues. They will always side with capital when rubber meets the profits.

[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They’re campaigning like the fascists are going to follow the rules. They won’t, they aren't, and they never have. Take the fucking gloves off and stop pretending like anything less than forcibly removing them and putting them in a jail cell for the rest of their lives is going to do much of anything.

[–] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

When you face the reality that they are part of that fascism things become much more clear as to what path to take

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Democrats are campaigning as if the 2026 election will be ~~fair~~. That's a mistake.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Even Russia has "elections."

[–] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 day ago

Democrats are campaigning as if we don't remember that they are shit