this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2026
62 points (100.0% liked)

Legal News

641 readers
13 users here now

International and local legal news.


Basic rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Sensitive topics need NSFW flagSome cases involve sensitive topics. Use common sense and if you think that the content might trigger someone, post it under NSFW flag.
3. Instance rules applyAll lemmy.zip instance rules listed in the sidebar will be enforced.


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Luigi Mangione is set to return to court as a judge weighs whether to allow or exclude certain evidence from his federal death penalty case in the killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PointlessProtestAgainstTheMachine@lemmy.org 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Obviously they planted all this evidence. Innocent.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Not even meming or "even if he did it, let him walk" (yes, but let's ignore that for a moment) I still personally consider this incredibly likely.

The timing feels suspect for catching him at all. Given how "professional" the actions in the video are, I don't think it makes sense that the perpetrator would still have the weapon actively on them that long after. You're really telling me the person who did what's in the video wouldn't find a moment to dump the gun in a storm drain, dumpster, etc? Especially in all the time they weren't caught?

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's going to be hilarious to see this entire case fall apart just because the cops were idiots cutting corners everywhere... with stars in their eyes thinking about who they thought they were arresting.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I hope so, I personally I am really not anticipating the judge throwing out the evidence.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

It depends on the order of events really. If they illegally searched his bag before arresting him, and something they found in the bag was the impetus for the arrest... It should be thrown out. Evidence has been thrown out for less.

If he was already under arrest, searching belongings is normal and expected.

[–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago

Sure. But it was the other way. Searched his bag and then arrested him. And then broke the chain of custody during transport. They say they found a gun, and an hour later a cop shows up at the station with the murder weapon and says this is the one we found on him.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

No argument that it should be, I just seriously doubt it will be regardless of the evidence. Pessimistic of me I know, but gestures broadly at everything

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago

they are just stringing this along to show the "rich" they are actually doing something about it.