this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2026

58 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

5800 readers

108 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

tom@feddit.uk

GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk

frankPodmore@slrpnk.net

UK government targets VPNs in new online safety consultation as Lords vote for ban (www.techradar.com)

submitted 1 day ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/unitedkingdom@feddit.uk

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 25 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] IanTwenty@piefed.social 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Parliament itself recommends VPN use for its members:

Labour's Lord Knight acknowledged that VPNs could "undermine the child safety gains of the Online Safety Act" but warned that age-gating the apps could be "extremely problematic". He said:

"My phone uses a VPN, following a personal device cyber consultation offered by this Parliament. VPNs can make us more secure, and we should not rush to deprive children of that safety."

[–] Infernal_pizza@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Isn't this part of the same amendment that will make government spyware mandatory on all devices? So does that mean that part passed as well? VPNs are not the most concerning part here yet that's the only bit that seems to be getting reported

page 20

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Are Linux, BSD, etc. about to become illegal in the UK? Good luck with that. It certainly seems to make GrapheneOS and all other privacy-preserving phone OSs illegal.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

I wonder if we can get around that. Tamper proof in software? So device comes with Windows and you can't uninstall their crap It's tamper proof! But you can just remove Windows.

[–] YesButActuallyMaybe@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Someone eli5 please: how are they gonna know I’m using a vpn if I use port 80 or 443?

Edit: oh they are gonna require vpn providers to do age verification and force them to not do business with minors. That’s dumb

[–] deadcream@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You think UK would be the first country to ban VPNs? There are thousands of talented and very committed computer scientists in authoritarian countries tirelessly working to enforce internet censorship. They discovered many wonderful technical solutions to this problem.

All the mainstream VPN protocols like OpenVPN and Wireguard don't even try to hide themselves and are easily detected no matter what port you use. They are useless if you country is seriously set to block VPNs.

There are different protocols specifically designed to circumvent censorship and they do so by masking their traffic to like something innocuous like HTTPS. However even they can be detected using advanced traffic analysis. For example, if a given machine only sends and receives HTTPS traffic to a single specific overseas server, it is safe to assume that it's not actually a genuine website traffic but a VPN masquerading as HTTPS.

There is special hardware that all users' traffic goes through that detects these patterns and automatically throttles/blocks these connections.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What if you were playing a browser game for hours? Wouldn't that also be HTTPS traffic to the same server all the time?

[–] deadcream@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Maybe, depending on the game. But your OS and running programs will still be making http requests to various servers. Microsoft's, Google's, Steam's, etc. Modern devices and OSes phone home constantly. If you have VPN all your traffic will go through a single server (unless you configure split tunneling to use VPN only for certain sites) and that's easily detectable.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

At this point it sounds easier to rsync our porn collections with each other..

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Some P2P routing solution seems to be needed, along the lines of Tor or i2p but disguising its traffic. But no doubt they'll be after any P2P communications next.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago

China manages to figure it out using deep packet inspection.

Funnily enough, they don't fully ban them. Just randomly cut them off to inconvenience the user.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

Presumably they'd learn the IP addresses the VPN providers are using and watch for connections to those.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Most of them do that too a degree anyway. Credit cards are only available to over 18s, so if you pay with one of those, that's your ID. I guess this is mostly for free VPNs (although I've never found one that was any good) and people paying with debit cards or crypto.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago

A lot of people in the UK don't have credit cards. Debit cards are fine and kids have those too. Dont Mullvad accept cash?

[–] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I will never get used to the comfort Britons appear to have with surveillance. I guess it's time to set up a Wireguard instance of my own in the Netherlands to proxy everything through.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago

It's not like we have a choice

[–] FishFace@piefed.social -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

But id cards, which might actually be useful, are unthinkable!

[–] loops@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The British will never ever ever accept ID cards.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

That's what I'm saying yes

[–] Paddzr@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Are they tho? anti ULEZ was driven hard due to cameras invading privacy. At least in the circles I've seen.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Goddamn, UK.