this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2026

257 points (99.2% liked)

Not The Onion

19394 readers

1019 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

257

Congressman Tries to Cut Pay of ICE Prosecutor with Racist X Account to $1 (www.texasobserver.org)

submitted 1 day ago by Beep@lemmus.org to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

34 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 34 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

“The amendment before you is simple, and it’s narrow,” Veasey said at the hearing. “It sends a clear message that we are not going to fund this man’s salary, and that Congress will not fund hate. We can stand by Nazi sympathizers and Hitler supporters, or we can do the right thing and honor the sacrifices of the men and women who died to stop the hateful spread of Nazism.”

The amendment did not receive a committee vote.

tHaT's BeCaUsE tHe DeMoCrAtz WoNt FiGhT fOr tHe PeOpLe!1!!

[–] Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Took a few reads for that headline to make grammatical sense because it’s just such a ridiculous sentence to read.

[+] huppakee@piefed.social -15 points 1 day ago (6 children)

This is so stupid, he does bad things on X and then as punishment they lower his salary? Not that i really care what happens to this man but this doesn't sound like a fair system to me. Either he is guilty and should get a fine or go to jail, or he is innocent and goes to work (however evil that job is) and gets paid like usual.

[–] ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Presumably members of congress don't usually get a say in the disciplinary actions of any federal agency.

ICE sent a letter to Veasey stating it would address the matter and that such internal investigations can take up to 120 days, but it has otherwise not provided any information.

Veasey’s amendment came a week after the Observer reported that Rodden, who was apparently pulled from federal immigration court schedules following the Observer’s reporting last February, had returned to immigration court in Dallas.

Since ICE doesn't want to fire the guy, this is one of the few official acts thay can be taken to "encourage" him to leave on his own.

[–] huppakee@piefed.social -4 points 1 day ago

Since ICE doesn't want to fire the guy, this is one of the few official acts thay can be taken to "encourage" him to leave on his own.

Which in this case is great, since Rodden is a bad person doing bad things. But a politician shouldn't be able to say something about someones salary or employment imo. Bad people still deserve to be treated fairly, that's how rule of law works.

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 day ago

No, fuck you. He gets 1$ so he quits.

[–] Fluffy_Ruffs@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This isn't a matter of law and no one is making that argument. This is an employer potentially taking disciplinary action which has nothing to do with legality.

[–] UsernameHere@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You’re defending the racist white supremist ICE prosecutor?

[–] huppakee@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

No i'm saying he is doing something stupid.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

and employers have evry right to remind folks “free speech” does not mean “no consequences.”

as someone who’s taxes pay this douchebag’s salary, I am fine lowering it to 1. Or fine firing him for conduct unbecoming.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

The problem is, it's an illegal salary, which means he's going to have an opportunity to sue, choosing more tax dollars to defend it, and then whatever court awarded fine on top of it.

[–] huppakee@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

as someone who’s taxes pay this douchebag’s salary, I am fine lowering it to 1. Or fine firing him for conduct unbecoming.

Do you realise you're taxes also pay for a teachers salary, and politicians having something to say about this salary also means they have something to say about that teachers salary? I would be fine with ICE lowering his salary, i'd be fine with ICE firing, i'd be fine with him being taken to jail after a fair trial. But politicians having this power is very very dangerous in the current political climate, even if this single time the power is used for doing good.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

i’m well aware of what taxes go to. and … well ok with none of my taxes paying bigots. all of them.

[–] UsernameHere@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why do you feel it is unfair for his salary to be lowered?

[–] huppakee@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because the rule of law is, that if you commit crime x you get punishment y. Lowering salary is not a regular punishment. If he would be fined with paying a fine the amount of his salary that would be ok with me. I'm not saying this man doesn't deserve punishment. But if his punishment was torture i'd also call that unfair.

Rule of Law means equal punishment for equal crimes regardless of the person committing them, so he should get the same punishment as someone who doesn't work at ICE.

[–] UsernameHere@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

As far as I can tell he didn’t break a law, it’s just a conflict of interest to have a racist prosecuting immigrants. So cutting his pay to force him out of the position was all that could be done by the people trying to remove him from that role. But you feel that isn’t fair.

[–] huppakee@piefed.social -4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you don't break a law you shouldn't be punished by the office that is about whether laws were followed or not. I know that sounds crazy. He could be punished by his employer, fine. He could be punished by an angry mob, fine. But if this guy gets punished while not breaking the law, you can bet some other people who didn't break the law will still get punished. For me considering something legally fair has nothing to do with what he deserves. I don't think we'll come to agree on that.

[–] UsernameHere@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you’re at work and you do something that would get you fired (which isn’t against the law) you should be fired. Why defend a racist in this scenario?

[–] huppakee@piefed.social -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not defending him, that's the result of me arguing the system should be fair. If his employer would fire him, i would be silent. Politicians are not employers. Let's look at it from another perspective; imagine a colleague of this racist have an x account where he tells people to come to protests about climate change, do you think a politician should have something to say about his salary too?

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So weird. And yes, you're defending him.

[–] huppakee@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not. I'm defending his position. It has nothing to do with the rotten apple himself.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The position of being a racist. That's what's being discussed. Racism is not a crime so it's an absolutely bizarre position to say that for some arbitrary reason, only law should be able to punish him for being a racist.

My employer can dock my pay or fire me for being a racist. Being a racist is not a protected characteristic. One has to wonder what the hell your point here would be.

[–] huppakee@piefed.social -2 points 1 day ago

My employer can dock my pay or fire me for being a racist.

Your employer can and should if you did something racist while doing your work. Your employer should not be able to fire you or lower your salary you for stuff you post online in your free time. Not even is that is as vile as this guys stuff. I'm not arguing he isn't a racist. Aside that, politicians aren't the employer of individual officers, teachers, social workers, etc.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why assume he's being stupid? Seems his opinions are intentional and informed.

[–] huppakee@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You can do something intentionally and still have someone consider that stupid. I get a lot of downvotes because people like him punished. I'm fine with him being punished, i am not fine with politicians acting as employers. A politician should also not be able to vote on the salary of a teacher, policeman or someone who cleans the government buildings. That is what i called stupid, the fact that he can punish someone for something wrong.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I see your point and have been upvoting you because it is absolutely true that once a standard is disposed with in service of a just cause, it tends to be disposed with for pretty much any cause thereafter, no matter how unjust. It IS a loss when just practices and standards are overturned, especially when it's because there's nothing else left to do.

The problem is that we are in a state of extreme social and political dysfunction where normal routes of dealing with corruption and bad actors have themselves been hijacked. This, getting rid of a fair standard in order to accomplish a desired goal that should have gotten taken care of far earlier and by other fair rules -- what you are protesting -- is all that's left.

As I said in another comment, in a functioning society we would not now be having this conversation. The usual practices would be taking care of most of this, with time and resources available to deal with outliers. But here we are. I appreciate your stand, I just wonder if there will be anything left to defend when the dust settles.

[–] huppakee@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think i should have been less judging and more understanding of the small amount of power the good guys have left. I know how it is right now is very far away from how it should be and i understand the weapon you have is a lot better than the weapon you wish you had. I'm looking in from the outside and seeing all these standards being overturned is very depressing. I want to shout 'DON'T DO IT, IT WILL BE USED AGAINST YOU!', but at the same time who am i to judge, especially when it will be used against you no matter what you do. I think rooting for a fair system might not be as important right now as rooting for the people who are fighting an uphill battle against powerful villains. I never expected my first comment would get so much backlash, so it definitely was insightful to hear so many people disagree with me.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nah, you're good. I'm glad we still have people speaking up for what is actually right, and not just that which has become necessary because everything else built on fairness has collapsed. And you're right, unfortunately: every rule broken now will probably be broken for all, and for the worst of reasons.

If these are your first comments then I look forward to more. You sure did get a warm welcome to Lemmy, lol.

[–] genericuser2000@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

I thought you didn't like new Accounts? You blasted me pretty good for having a new account just yesterday actually. Called me a bot and a troll. Was part of your whole strawman argument, remember? You didn't address a single point, just chirped the age of my account. AND THEN YOU DELETED YOUR REPLY when I torched it with my rebuttal. Super accountable of you! My comment is still there, visible for all to see.

Nice job being another spineless American. Couldn't even cut it on the internet. One more nasty, spineless American to add to the list. No wonder your country is getting rolled daily.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

TIL America jails people for racism

[–] Kyouki@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Only poor

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world -4 points 1 day ago

It sets a precedent that a very scary