this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2026
734 points (98.2% liked)

World News

52236 readers
2402 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

California Gov. Gavin Newsom's office said the governor was denied entry into a venue at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, on Jan. 21, after being invited to speak at the event due to "pressure" from the Trump administration.

Newsom had been scheduled to speak with Fortune at the USA House, Davos, a privately organized event, at the World Economic Forum, which has been recognized by the U.S. government as the nation's headquarters in Davos.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works 6 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Ah the wonders of lemmy. A group of people who wonder how Trump won and then insist any replacement must be perfect.

[–] Seasm0ke@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago

Aw poor Gavin newsome, hell have to displace some of californias most vulnerable people via sweeps to feel better. If only we gave him more power we could have avoided this

Perfection? The only thing that stopped him from joining the right is that Trump holds grudges. That fascist reject hung out with Charlie Kirk and threw trans people under the bus despite boasting about how much he supports the queers for decades. He tried so hard to join them because he has always been a slimy pickme neofeudalist. If he gets elected, there will not be the reforms needed to prevent fascism from rising again. Hell, he might even usher it in.

Also, how do you think Harris lost to Trump? Do you think the Democrats bear no responsibility for it? That there were no long term trends that led to populism; tends helped along in equal part by both parties? Is it only that the nonvoters ruined perfection? Are there really no tactical missteps that you can remember from 2024? Really!?

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago

Under Newsom, California is the 4th largest GDP on the planet and the Davos losers listened to racist, pedophile, rapist, felon fucknut!?!?

[–] roserose56@lemmy.zip 91 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's pretty good, but it has two extra red stripes in the tent.

[–] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I could go for some Red Stripe. Think they'll let me in?

Ayy, my favorite beer 🙌

[–] billbasher@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] PokerChips@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Probably the same company that owns the USA network. Watching shows on that network will make you want throw your tv out the window. 6 minute ads per 4.5 minutes of show time. Their ads just keep gooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooing. And yes. That's how absurd they are.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not even close to being a vaguely related company.

[–] PokerChips@programming.dev -1 points 19 hours ago

Yep just looked it up. Today is not nearly as bad as Network. Network is like a mosquito.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Yeah and then he ripped them a new one at the event that he did end up speaking at in Davos.

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 118 points 2 days ago

Time for my least favorite game!

"Imagine a Democrat did that to a Republican!"

... Fox News would be running that story for a week, screaming at the public about how they're being discriminated against and how the Democrats hate freedom and free speech. How they hate "you" and your "values" etc etc etc...

[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.blahaj.zone 98 points 2 days ago (5 children)

This is really funny considering Trump and Newsome seem to agree on quite a few things

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Do you think newsom would steal children from parents, shoot mothers, molest children and call for war and tariffs?

Do you think newsom would let a prick like Steve miller pull his Hitler act?

These two people are not the same.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 101 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (9 children)

I would one thousand percent prefer Newsom over Trump and I almost guarantee Newsom wouldn’t send his brownshirts into red states to shoot mothers.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean a lot of us have been voting blue no matter who for our entire adult lives and things keep ratcheting right into Nazi land

[–] Zink@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've been voting that way too. I question it often but haven't changed my mind yet.

I might have an issue with "vote blue no matter who" were it not for the fact that the morons around us are voting by the tens of millions FOR Nazi land!

They had the opportunity to vote for the center-right corporate-friendly administration that will probably not get much progressive stuff done because they have the same billionaire donors.

But no, they voted for the idiotic criminal self-labeled dictator THREE TIMES! They cared more about who could get hurt (LGBT, minority, female, "other") than whether we could actually improve society.

The DNC shares a ton of blame too. I don't mean to leave them out of it. I hope that some young progressive voices can drag the party to the left. It would be great to not be forced into a two party system in the first place of course, but I worry that the only way such a change will happen any time soon is that a lot of people die and then the survivors write new rules.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The democrats just voted to give ICE more money. They always do this and then we ratchet right into Nazi land… I’m getting pretty old and this always happens. I’ve watched it my entire life the democrats don’t ever do anything to stop the evil. They enable it every time

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Exactly. Americans need to do something else because there isn’t any voting their way out of this. Keep voting democrat, but know that it wont actually fix anything. It’s not meant to.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 1 points 14 hours ago

The point isn't to keep voting for democrats because they will save us.

The point, given we are forced into a two party system, is more about trying to take over the party most of the time while also voting against the outright nazis in general elections.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Newsome is going to enable the tech billionaires and Israel so basically we will keep marching in lockstep with project 2025 with funny tweets. He has been fighting the one time 5% billionaire tax proposal in California and he vetoes everything that upsets shareholder profit in California.

[–] theparadox@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

with funny tweets

Those are from a team of social media savvy folks. He's demonstrated that he doesn't always understand his own tweets.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If they are homeless or trans, Newsome is happy to arrest or shoot them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PolydoreSmith@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (4 children)

What if the mothers were homeless?

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 9 points 1 day ago

"Now we're talking"

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Our standards have fallen so low

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GraveyardOrbit@lemmy.zip 56 points 2 days ago (16 children)

He just kneeled and licked the boots of fascist Ben Shapiro, the gap is much smaller than you’d think

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

Yeah talking with a shitty media personality is basically the same as deploying brownshirts and the actual military to American cities

[–] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (11 children)

If you can't see how regularly platforming and legitimizing right wing ghouls to your predominantly liberal audience creates the permission structure that allows for the deploying of various breed of thugs to American cities, I don't know what to tell you.

Gavin Newsom is a dangerous man, and should be treated as such.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] hector@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago

Yet without popular reform, which he is constitutionally opposed to, they can't win. Your lesser of two assholes arguments has no answer to the fact that these status quo democrats cannot reliably win. Now with republicans cheating in so many ways, that's especially true.

He had his chance in 2024 and he declined to stand up and take the election.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›