this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2026
454 points (99.6% liked)

politics

27380 readers
4048 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one 65 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (5 children)

Why do this just in Minnesota? Why not do a nationwide economic blackout this Friday January 23?

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 35 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Because people in other areas aren't being personally affected much (yet). And they think they can't afford to lose pay or get fired; instead they'll just lose their country.

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 21 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's not so much that people aren't affected. It's that most don't want to risk being the first mover. Firing 1 person for missing work is easy. Firing half your staff for ye same thing is a lot harder for businesses.

The plus side is that it's akin to a supersaturated solution. Once a crystal does form, it can grow and spread rapidly.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world -2 points 4 days ago

Also most people are lazy and don't give a shit.

People can't stop using Twitter - the absolute smallest of inconveniences - to quit supporting a Nazi. Actually doing a real thing, with potential real consequences - is beyond what most Americans appear to be willing to do.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works -2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Lol, I'm sorry, you think we haven't already lost our country?

It's good to see optimists here on Lemmy.

Oh, and yeah, very few can afford to miss a day of work. I feel like people not from here don't believe that... Maybe check your privilege.

[–] beanie@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 days ago

Either way, soon you won’t have any jobs

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago (2 children)

People only act en masse when they are affected en masse. It's very selfish and very foolish but it's a symptom of a complete lack of group identity or group cohesion.

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

I'll participate.

[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

It's almost like there has been a huge campaign to divide the US.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 47 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

I love the energy but not shopping for one day does nothing.

People are just going to delay their purchases. Better would be to cut all unnecessary purchases, or to be selective about where you shop. Having lower than average numbers one day and higher than average numbers the next is literally not even going to move the needle.

The work stoppage, on the other hand, is a little more promising.

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Yeah this is why sociologists tell people not to bother with these. It's slactivism, makes people feel good about themselves for participating but has no effect. So they likely think "Well, there's my good deed."

Just the same, a one-day national strike won't accomplish anything, and will actually be worse because only 1% of people will actually do it, making it a joke if the media covers it. And organizers waste so much time and energy on it.

No you gotta go be visible or make a permanent change.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Which sociologists say "not to bother"? Is it 9 out of 10 of them, like in a toothpaste commercial?

And why do you think people who participate in these things only do it once and stop? Generally the people who participate in one thing are the same people who continue participating in more things. Movements rarely spring full-force into existence at once, they build as more people are affected and/or become aware. Awareness is definitely starting to grow as even oblivious parts of the county are now starting to hear stuff getting through their bubbles that doesn't match the propaganda from their usual feeding trough.

TBH this post reads like a copy of the typical "your efforts are useless so don't bother" propaganda that every. single. post advocating activism gets--there are at least 5 times as many posts lie this trying to dissuade people from taking action as posts advocating action. Gee I wonder whose interests that helps?

If you want to argue about what works best and encourage more effective activities, go ahead and do that instead of just complaining about people who are doing something instead of nothing.

[–] mika_mika@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They're not saying that. They're saying those efforts are useless so do something that actually matters. Like a general strike.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They literally said what I quoted and what I responded to: That sociologists say not to bother (who? which?) and that if people do one thing they think they're done and stop (not at all in my experience).

[–] mika_mika@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Okay I got one for you. The No Kings protests amounted to absolutely nothing and things have only gotten worse. From my experience it sounds like the person you're replying to is more correct.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Protesting isn't effective until it is. Maybe it never will be or maybe the tide will turn or who knows what. We only know doing nothing accomplishes nothing. There are plenty of cases on video of people in Minneapolis preventing ICE from taking people when a crowd showed up yelling, recording, and blowing whistles, where ICE turned around and left. Sometimes it worked and sometimes it didn't.

Now since you know so much about what doesn't work, tell me what should people be doing and what you have done to help make whatever that is happen? I'm tired of every time people try to take action and there's a post about it on here, you all come swarming out of the woodwork to repeat your same old talking points saying it's useless and no one should bother. What is your agenda?

Either actually start doing something you think will be effective or shut up about it. Stop trying to dissuade the people who are actually doing something, whether you think they're effective or not.

[–] mika_mika@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I quit my job and am advocating for a general strike. A method that will have an actual effect. I will also inform people about methods of protest that are ineffective because there's too much on the line here to be so soft. Not everyone is as privileged, or they think fascism coming for them and their families will not be as harmful as lost labor.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

You're advocating for a general strike? Great! Except ... then why are you disparaging the very people this thread is about who are doing exactly that, why are you saying "those efforts are useless" to: "Unions, faith groups and local leaders urge residents not to work, shop or go to school after killing of Renee Good". That is a general strike. Even though it's just one day per week for now.

I know what your next reply will because I've seen it many times. You'll say it's not enough, that everyone has to strike every day all at once or it's useless. Nope. That's never going to happen and isn't how it happened in places where protests and strikes were effective. It doesn't have to be everyone every single day, though the more the better. It has to be enough that they can't be ignored or shut down.

Will enough happen here? I really don't know because there is so much propaganda flooding the zone to suppress information, to scare and to dissuade people, and you're contributing to that. If you really do want to help, maybe at least just stop contributing to that.

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago

Protesting is only effective because there is the implication that if nothing changes, the people will make a change.

What happens when the powers that be realize that the US people are all bark and no bite? Well, exactly the sort of stuff that is happening in Minnesota right now

[–] Ironfist79@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

[citation needed]

Stop trying to discourage people from taking action.

[–] Butterphinger@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 days ago

Anything short of assembling an anti-fascist militia is a larp.

we'll just not buy things for a day or two

piss in the wind, go buy a gun.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Shareholder call:

While we did see a record low revenue on Jan 25th, we made up for it with record high revenue on Jan 26th. Not only was makeup buying more intense than normal activity, numbers were greatly helped by adding popular product links from the "thank you for your feedback" page, which also gives the executive team things to laugh about.

[–] RoflmasterBigPimp@feddit.org 15 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Strikes are very powerful. One key rule: never announce in advance how long they will last or they will just wait you out!

In 1920, during the "Kapp Putsch", 12 million workers went on strike and the coup collapsed in about 100 hours!

[–] GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world 25 points 5 days ago

First thing Donnie’s civilly forfeit assets need to go towards is reparations to Minnesota.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I'll purchase nothing on Friday in solidarity.

I wasn't going to anyway, in fact I do all of my weekly shopping on Sunday morning. But, still.

(Do some people really find it any sort of hardship to not buy something one day a week?)

[–] Gaja0@lemmy.zip 6 points 5 days ago

No, but businesses notice when line go down. Panic ensues when the public realizes hyper-consumerism is optional.

[–] Sc00ter@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 days ago

Yes. My wife is one of those people. I come home to packages on the porch every single day. Consumerism with excessive connectivity can lead to excessive spending

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Love it when helping involves zero sacrifices.

[–] betahack@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

fuck a day! do it for a week, a month!

[–] redwattlebird@lemmings.world 5 points 4 days ago

Well, you pretty much continue until you get what your want. So the most effective thing to do is to strike indefinitely.

[–] RoflmasterBigPimp@feddit.org 11 points 5 days ago (2 children)
[–] PlaidBaron@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Cant use that word. Too communist or something. Idk.

[–] SailorMoss@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago

I think the proper tactic is to stand by what we are. Bernie ran as a democratic socialist. He normalized the use of that term. By doing so he connected his supporters to a history of ideas, tactics and, thinkers. We need to normalize the idea of a general strike.

[–] RoflmasterBigPimp@feddit.org 1 points 5 days ago

NGL, this was my first guess why they called it that.

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Also they are saying don't shop or go to school. So a strike plus other stuff, it looks like.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

One day won't even slow ICE down. I bet their activities are already causing economic strain on the city now. Need to shut down until they leave.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

The trick is, how do you make a statement federally without disrupting the state?

[–] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

refuse to continue paying federal taxes

Cut federal taxes and wipe your ass with interstate commerce rules. Pretty sure shit would change pretty damned quick if all trade stopped moving out of California.

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 4 points 5 days ago

Oh, that's easy. Stop doing what the feds tell you. No more federal taxes, and add in some nullification too. If other states like California, Illinois, and New York agree to help out of solidarity, threats of cut federal funding won't hit as hard.

The problem is avoiding the difficult situation of Trump sending in some guys to shoot some people and imprison the survivors.

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca -5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Americans are pathetic, they aren't going to do a damn thing.

They couldn't even be bothered to get off their ass to vote.

[–] Cyberflunk@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago

SHOPPING

how about shutting the whole fucking country down

Clog every street

Ruin every road

Remove every street sign

RUIN THE FASCIST MACHINES

AMERICA IS ALREADY DEAD, You can't hurt it more than those in charge of it already are.

RESIST

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago (3 children)

How does negatively affecting businesses pressure Turmp and ICE?

[–] chris@lemmy.grey.fail 11 points 5 days ago

A general strike is one of the only non-violent levers of power the people have.

It sucks. It probably won't do anything. But I'll take this over open war with ICE any day.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago

A lot of Trump's power comes from the support of the oligarchs. Shutting everything down hurts them, and shows class solidarity which scares the shit out of them.

load more comments
view more: next ›