By the time Mauritius gets them, they'll be under water...
this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2026
17 points (94.7% liked)
United Kingdom
5782 readers
124 users here now
General community for news/discussion in the UK.
Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.
Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Why did we give them up? Cost-cutting measure?
(No I'm not agreeing with the orange fatball, I'm just wondering)
An international court put forward an opinion stating that the £3million purchase of the Chagos Islands was illegal, as the UK made it a condition on granting Mauritius independence.
I believe the stated reason was to avoid the possibility of the court ruling against the UK owning the islands leading to the base needing to be shut down. The agreement with Mauritius includes a 99 year lease to secure the base at Diego Garcia.
ah so base-loss mitigation, thanks
I looked into this (just on Wikipedia). Before granting Mauritius independence, the UK split the territory into Mauritius and the British Indian Ocean Territory in order to have a place to put the base that's there now. But the UN takes a dim view on such shenanigans and tends to say that such territories should be reconstituted. (See also: controversy over the Partition of India, which was less brazenly self-interested, but very consequential)
So I believe the UN had actually already decided it was no bueno. I don't know why Mauritius was granted independence though; it was uninhabited when settled by the french, then ceded to Britain after the defeat of Napoleon. I assume expense had something to do with it though, since in the mid 20th centuries many colonies were money pits.
Irony.
These are International Powers who only recognize STRENGTH
The only reason we stopped messing with the DPRK was because they got nukes, the only reason we overthrew the Libyan government was because they didn't, the only reason Iran is still and will continue to be under threat is because they don't; China and Russia have proven themselves to be true to their word and good allies; we've betrayed our allies for decades and take pride in crushing them WHAT'RE YOU TALKING ABOUT
Russia have proven themselves to be true to their word
Ukraine literally gave up its nuclear arsenal because Russia promised not to invade them in 1994, what are you on about.
nato violated their sovereignty first with the coup
which coup? you know russia claims we installed zelensky, but he's only upset because he felt like he was the one that should be installing Ukranian leaders, like zelensky predecessor, and the one before him, and the one before the one before him.
Not that I follow this advice but
2014 / Euromaidan
i'm unfamiliar with claims of the west supposedly installing Zelenskyy