this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2026
252 points (99.6% liked)

Games

44669 readers
1152 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I do like the idea of business people doing business in a VR boardroom instead of flying all over the place and wasting company money on hotels and fine dining. Nothing to do with meta but how a VR tool can be used for things other than gaming.

I bought a Quest 3s about a year ago and am an old school, single-player gamer. Meta sure tried hard to get me to socialize and meet "friends" while VR'ing but I was never interested. Also, because of the whole surveillance layer built into new tech I worry about my interior spatial domicile information being exposed. Not that there is a big secret in a house floor plan but I just don't like people sneakily looking at my shit.

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.org 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I do like the idea of business people doing business in a VR boardroom instead of flying all over the place and wasting company money on hotels and fine dining. Nothing to do with meta but how a VR tool can be used for things other than gaming.

Sure but I fear that they all feel so important that they won't use it.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 hours ago

Sigh...I agree.

[–] Aljernon@lemmy.today 3 points 3 hours ago

Zuckerberg got lucky once, used the talents of others to capitalize on that luck. If he was smart, he would have quickly retired and set about enjoying his wealth but instead he's wasted small fortunes running Facebook. Got high on his own supply when really he was never especially talented at anything.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 10 points 11 hours ago

Well they gave it their best shot. It was literally impossible for them to have produced a more compelling product. That would have required skill and talent

[–] bitcrafter@programming.dev 7 points 16 hours ago

Thank goodness there was nothing more useful we could have done as a society with all of the tens of billions of dollars that was spent on this project, or it would have been an incredible waste!

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 5 points 16 hours ago

Hey Suckerberg, how's "the future of the Internet" working out for ya?

[–] urandom@lemmy.world 18 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

To what are they gonna rename the company now?

[–] TheColonel@reddthat.com 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] bytesonbike@discuss.online 23 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Meta is now SLOP:

  • Social media
  • Large Learning Models
  • Online Engagement
  • Pedo support

I'm Mark Zuckerfuck and I suck.

[–] TheColonel@reddthat.com 3 points 17 hours ago

I was thinking of spelling out the acronym but hilariously, Pedo (defense, support, porn, or something) was 1000% what I was going to use for P!

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)
[–] bytesonbike@discuss.online 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm actually kinda angry. There was a lot of money being thrown at this metaverse thing, and I wanted to milk that sweet Facebook money for as long as I can building products nobody use. Now I'll never get that chance.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 11 hours ago

I mean there's always be vrchat, Which is basically what meta was trained to do but actually works.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] maxie@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Companies like meta and Amazon can’t be trusted with gaming, it’s just a silly side project to them. If I was working at a studio acquired by either I would be shit scared for the studios longevity.

[–] bytesonbike@discuss.online 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I remember when Amazon went all-in on gaming. Everyone was skeptical, and they partnered up with so many Asian companies.

Then they pulled out. Then they pulled back in. And now they're kinda in a weird place.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 1 hour ago

What did they make?

[–] bytesonbike@discuss.online 1 points 19 hours ago

Microsoft too.

They flip flop over if gaming is important to them all the time.

[–] Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah time to start saving as much as you can if they buy you, if you weren’t already doing so.

Then you’ll at least have something for when the inevitable comes.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 94 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Who cares about billions of dollars wasted on the last profitless scheme when there is a whole new profitless scheme to dumb money into? Line goes up!

[–] bytesonbike@discuss.online 4 points 19 hours ago

I want cloud gamified LLM GenAI NFT Cryptocurrency Neural network IoT Web3 Metaverse!

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You'd think they would lose a lot of money making all those shit investments, but then America is the upside down and nothing makes sense over there.

[–] Aielman15@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

It's a bug in our simulation. If you're poor and you lose a little money, you go bankrupt. But if you're rich and you burn a fuckton of money, you can buffer overflow into richness and go back on top.

[–] Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

Even better they should sell the oculus tech to someone else who might give a damn.

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Oh look, that completely predictable outcome of an obviously stupid fucking idea, that people still felt the need to argue with me about so many years ago despite it being obviously doomed for failure.

Can Facebook unsteal the name now?

[–] BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I've always appreciated that they stole the name from Snow Crash. Like Zuck completely unironically named his company after a technological dystopian hellscape infected with a virus that destroys people's brains. Honestly, I don't think there's a better name for Facebook.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

completely predictable outcome of an obviously stupid fucking idea

Nah, it could have worked if Meta started by

  1. sell the hardware to businesses and schools at a loss, with a requirement users be able to take the sets home.

  2. Publish standards to allow all apps to have multiplayer and compatible full body avatars, same control scheme, movement, etc.

  3. buying up VRChat and any other apps with a large user base, refactoring them for compatibility.

  4. Develop and release free multiuser apps, from virtual office/meetings to virtual movies to home decor.

Somehow FB didn't even try to exploit the same effects that forced everyone into Apple, MS, and FB.

To be clear, its for the best, the end result of FB giving out millions of headsets at a loss would have been making even more money selling much more precise user data, and virtual nikes and shit.

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip -2 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

No. The entire concept is just dumb. Adding less efficient means of doing things isn't a selling point.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 2 points 6 hours ago

The real selling point would be that everyone else is using it and you need to use it to interact with them, same with FB. How many people are still forced to maintain a FB account to talk to their boomer relatives?

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Clearly the idea isn't done because there are other versions of the metaverse that work very well and are making money.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

there are other versions of the metaverse that work very well and are making money.

What do you mean?

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

ChatVR, RecRoom, Roblox, BattleBit, Project Loom (Which Google killed for no reason, but it wasn't because of lack of success), and of course the OG, Second Life.

Hell you could even make the arguement for Elite Dangerous and Star Citizen if they ever finish it.

Some of those projects haven't just been successful they're so successful that they are starting to affect government policy.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 2 points 2 hours ago

How have they affected government policy, beyond Roblox probably causing some laws being passed about exploitation and protection of minors?

You have a point, I think the big thing FB failed to capitalize on is that someone who wants to use ChatVR or Roblox has to go into chatVR or roblox. FB had an opportunity to build an entire ecosystem they control, and they failed to get anyone inside of it.

I genuinely have no idea how they managed to spend that much money and not get a single decent app. Horizons literally looked like a tech demo someone slapped together for a gamejam or something.

[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wait, hold up, are you telling me that you knew no one would want to wear a headset to join a 90’s style AOL chat room?

[–] FellowEnt@sh.itjust.works 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

~40000 people playing VRChat right now FYI.

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 3 points 19 hours ago

Because it has legs

[–] skooma_king@piefed.social 41 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So, they were still throwing tons of resources into this years after it flopped?

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 46 points 1 day ago

"Flop", to me, implies some sort of jump. "Metaverse" just kinda rolled off the edge of a cliff immediately, like a dog shitting on a frozen hill.

[–] Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus 9 points 1 day ago

they took the meta out of Meta 🤣

[–] BroBot9000@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (7 children)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] C1pher@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Why not shut it all down?

load more comments
view more: next ›