this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2026
118 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

8419 readers
1250 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://mander.xyz/post/45242789

...

Russian Railway, which operates approximately 85,000 km of railway, is going through a crisis that has prompted Russian authorities to consider exceptional measures to avoid default, according to an analysis published by Europa Liberă. ...

Russian Railways’ total debt has reached approximately 4 trillion rubles (equivalent to about USD 50–51 billion, EUR 43 billion), at a time when revenues have been affected by the slowdown in the war economy and the highest interest rates in two decades.

The company, which has approximately 700,000 employees, is heavily exposed to state-owned banks, particularly VTB, and its inability to meet its financial obligations could have a knock-on effect on the Russian banking system, several analysts warn.

β€œThis crisis at Russian Railways is one of the factors contributing to accelerating inflation in the Russian economy,” said Russian economist Igor LipsiΘ›, quoted by Current Time. According to him, falling revenues, rising tariffs, and inflationary pressures directly affect the population and companies dependent on rail transport.

The war in Ukraine, a systemic shock for the rail operator

The invasion of Ukraine was a systemic shock for Russian Railways. The prioritization of military transport, imposed by the government starting in 2024, has seriously affected trade flows and the punctuality of civilian deliveries.

...

In an attempt to stabilize the financial situation, the Russian government has ordered the sale of the Moscow Towers office complex, a 62-story building in the Moscow City financial district, purchased by Russian Railways in 2024 for approximately 193 billion rubles (about USD 2.4 billion), according to the Ukrainian portal UNN.

...

The Moscow authorities are considering several options to support the company, including:

  • increasing freight transport tariffs;
  • increasing state subsidies;
  • tax cuts;
  • using reserve funds;
  • converting part of the debt into shares, which would give state banks direct stakes in the company.

...

Web archive link

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org 2 points 2 hours ago

What this also does mean: Russian Railways will not invest as much into their infrastructure, because they do not have the money. This might work for some while, but there will be that bridge that needed to be replaced back in 1995. The much needed new line will not be build. Facilities will rot and disintegrate. Maintenance is not being done. Investment in new trains will be postponed. It will work for a while and then slowly start to disintegrate

[–] ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I'm not going to defend anything here, but at least with the Americans, you can say their invasions serve their own self-interest. But at this point, why not just stop? Who is this serving at this point? Let's say they get Ukraine tomorrow, then what? They're going to need decades to recover from this.

The more I think about it, the less I understand. At least with Trump it's simple. Use power to get more money. Destroy the EU, do what you want. Etc.

The inferiority complex of the Gremlin from the Kremlin must be nourished with megalomanic fuel.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 30 points 1 day ago

Because it would be a "defeat", and after pouring so much into the war, they don't want to seem like it was just wasted.
Maybe.
Sunk cost fallacy.

And also those in power are surely still doing pretty fine.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 11 points 1 day ago

IDK; the USA just has a longer way to go down yet, economically. Look at Russia and think: this is where we'll be in X years if nothing changes.

Also America fights wars away from their country, not adjacent. Wars are less visible (not invisible though), affect current affairs less.

[–] Emopunker@feddit.org 8 points 1 day ago

Seems like Putin doesn't care if it is a pyrrhic victory.

[–] cron@feddit.org 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Russian Railways is state-owned, therefore a financial collapse seems unlikely. It will be another burden on the russian state budget, though.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I see it quite likely 😁

The Russian state budget is under enormous strain alteady, oil prices plummeting, wealthfund almost used up to prop up last years budget, "war economy" down...

I mean if they continue like this it'll be 1991 all over again lol.

[–] cron@feddit.org 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If anything "happens" to Russian Railways, it will probably tear the rest of the industry with it.

The linked post suggests that the state could try to sell it to the banks, but that sounds like just shifting the risk. A collapse of the banks would be even more desastrous.

Russia might also increase the prices for transport, but this will increase all prices down the line, increasing inflation even further.

And lastly, Russia can just print more money.

And lastly, Russia can just print more money.

Which dies have its consequences too (looking at you Germany after ww1)

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 6 points 1 day ago

For that to happen the EU will have to put it on its big boy pants and put boots on the ground in Ukraine or commit to arming it fully, not just some wishy washy commitments.

[–] UncleOb@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I mean, if only Russians could somehow stop the war.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm not sure how to read your comment.

If you mean "If only Russia could somehow stop the war", meaning the regime, I'm 100% with you: all they need to do is stop. Done.

If you mean Russians per se, i.e. the population - many are trying, but the dystopian lockdown is much further along over there. This article paints a pretty bleak picture.

[–] UncleOb@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

I meant both. Of course the regime can just stop whenever they want but it's hard to be sympathetic of all the soldiers in Ukraine actively fighting and committing all sort of atrocities. They could, you know, not go there and kill people?

[–] Anonymaus@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What do you propose that they haven’t already tried?

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 7 points 1 day ago

Every little bit helps.

The prioritization of military transport, imposed by the government starting in 2024, has seriously affected trade flows and the punctuality of civilian deliveries.

Imagine a crowd on a platform, waiting for their train to bring them to work, even later than usual, then a long freight train full of military equipment rushes by. Can't be good for morale.

[–] 20cello@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

I'll be honest, I'm not sorry

[–] mustbe3to20signs@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

So destroying border-near railways as dual-use infrastructure hurts the ruzzian state in two ways? Sounds great!

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago