this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2026
138 points (97.9% liked)

politics

27088 readers
1683 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works 103 points 2 days ago (8 children)

Every time I read "secretary of war" I have to laugh. It exudes so much small dick energy! How insecure you have to be to rename the dept of defense to dept of war just so it sounds "tougher"?

[–] FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world 41 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Pete Hegseth - Secretary of Large Penile Strength and Karate and WAR

[–] thelivefive@startrek.website 7 points 2 days ago

Next years official title

Pete Hegseth - secretary of kickin ass and not being drunk in the hottest whitest no fattys or beardos hemisphere on earth also I didn't assault any women

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

I know he is an asshole, but I miss Chuck Norris jokes.

They were never funny, but they were not funny in a simpler time.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Everything about that guy screams micropeen.

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No legitimate media should ever use that term. It's illegitimate.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 11 points 2 days ago

I get that perspective. However, it is important to know that the department of defense from 2 years ago is not the same as the the department of war today. It has been systematically changed to give the regime more power. It has made defense industries war industries. And it is ready to be deployed against US citizens.

We need to understand that this change has actually happened.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 days ago

It's just an acronym for Whiskey And Rape.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

More like whiskey dick energy.

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Imagine being so insecure that even when some gives you the biggest dick on the planet, and carte blanche to swing it however you want, you still have to compensate by shouting into a megaphone about how big your dick is.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Probably why the guy drinks so much.

[–] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

Secretary of War Crimes

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

They figured "Ministry of Peace" was too on-the-nose, even for them.

But war is peace, so.....

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 72 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I know there's a lot of really scary stuff happening with this administration right now, and I really don't want to seem dismissive of that (its certainly scaring the shit out of me), but honestly, this just seems like Hegseth wanted to ride in the cool plane cos it makes his peepee feel big. Not sure we should read any more into it. If something big was going to go down, it would be Trump on the "doomsday plane".

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago

If something big was going to go down, it would be Trump on the "doomsday plane".

Would they actually tell him though? Would be real easy to get a promotion by ordering the destruction of the WH and Pentagon while being in the bomb proof plane.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Everything he does and says is basically what an 8 or 9 year old thinks is cool.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Which one? Little Petey or Taco?

[–] PhatalFlaw@lemmy.world 68 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My guess is there's a reason this plane is rarely (if ever) seen by the public. Other administrations probably realize that you shouldn't parade your most important assets around for potential adversaries to study, but oh well, here we are.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's literally virtue signaling, taking that particular plane implies they're ready for war be it South America or Greenland.

[–] teolan@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Ore like vice signaling.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How can an aircraft survive a Nuclear attack?

I believe it's just heavily shielded to prevent EMP from destroying all the electronic surfaces in it. If I remember correctly, it's outfitted with a ton of comms equipment that duplicate central systems on the ground, so should they be destroyed, this thing just takes off and continuously refuels and flies to prevent getting destroyed, and it keeps military comms running so they can keep launching nukes or whatever.

[–] FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

A little bit of doomsday sounds a bit too appetizing right about now.