this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2026
47 points (98.0% liked)

Cooking

9566 readers
54 users here now

Lemmy

Welcome to LW Cooking, a community for discussing all things related to food and cooking! We want this to be a place for members to feel safe to discuss and share everything they love about the culinary arts. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow!

Taken a nice photo of your creation? We highly encourage sharing with our friends over at !foodporn@lemmy.world.


Posts in this community must be food/cooking related. Recipes for dishes you've made and post picture of are encouraged but are not a requirement. Posts of food you are enjoyed or just think like food are welcomed as well.

Posts can optionally be tagged. We would like the use and number of tags to grow organically. Feel free to use a tag that isn't listed if you think it makes sense to do so. We encourage using tags to help organize and make browsing easier, but you don't have to use them if you don't want to.

TAGS:

FORMAT:

[QUESTION] What are your favorite spices to use in soups?

Other Cooking Communities:

!bbq@lemmy.world - Lemmy.world's home for BBQ.

!foodporn@lemmy.world - Showcasing your best culinary creations.

!sousvide@lemmy.world - All things sous vide precision cooking.

!koreanfood@lemmy.world - Celebrating Korean cuisine!


While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by the Lemmy.World Terms of Service: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

  1. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.
  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.
  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed
  4. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem.

Failure to follow these guidelines will result in your post/comment being removed and/or more severe actions. All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. We ask that the users report any comment or post that violates the rules, and to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hey everyone,

I have noticed that some recipes on the internet make no sense and have my suspicions that they may be AI slop. The ratios are off, the cook time is unlikely, the illustration is AI made... But it's hard. And it will likely be getting harder to identify AI generated recipes in the future.

It's come to the point that I have a hard time trusting a recipe witten after the AI craze started (let's call it 2025). I'm so suspicious of everything, my go-to "authenticity" check is to not bother with recipes that have recent publication dates. But this isn't exactly fair nor fool proof.

Do you have tips on how to spot an AI generated recipe?

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] roserose56@lemmy.zip 1 points 11 hours ago

Internet is amazing, you can find many recipes, but as AI comes in, one way to find legit recipes that won't burn your house or make something disgusting, recipe books, YouTube and cooking channels on TV are some options to cook.
Also, consider asking friends and neighbors. You can find tips and lost traditional recipes.\

Here where I live, I watch and read specific well known chef's in my country. I also watch food network Italia, their channel has Italians cooking, with some amazing recipes. Nothing similar to the USA one.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

If you are using ublock Origin or a fork of it add these filters to your block lists to hide a lot of AI junk.

https://lemmy.world/comment/21130675

[–] hexagonwin@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Yea.... I really should proofread my comments..

[–] FlatFootFox@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

I typically stick to recipe websites with a good reputation rather than random blogs that come up in search results. But that can be tricky if you’re looking for a specific dish.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Might have to go back to the cookbook concept of yore.

So, either buy a physical, reputable cookbook and then try the recipes in there. Or just go to known-good recipe webpages and go through their recipes.

But yeah, just thinking "I'd like to make Venezuelan vuvuzela vegetables", then typing that into a search engine and cooking whatever's the first result, that won't be possible anymore...

[–] redhorsejacket@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I've mentioned this elsewhere, but it's a drum worth beating; if you live somewhere with a public library, there is a very good chance that they have a collection of cookbooks that are available to check out for free. Alternatively, no one has ever batted an eye at me making copies of the specific recipes I want to try right there at the library. I have to pay $0.10 a copy, but it's worth it. Especially since I know how I cook, and this keeps the library's books out of harm's way. My local library has stuff ranging from the latest James Beard winners, to tried and true standbys like The Joy of Cooking, as well as stuff with a local focus (either ingredients, or historical).

[–] elephantium@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Funny you mention the library; I put a couple of cookbooks on hold just a few minutes ago because of this community!

[–] dkc@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes, cookbooks are the way to go. SEO and AI slop have made finding recipes on the Internet a frustrating experience. I've slowly built up a collection of about five to seven cookbooks. Those books offer me plenty of choices. For example, just a few days ago, I made buttermilk biscuits and ended up having four different recipes to compare. I also find myself flipping through them to discover new recipes. It's offline, peaceful, and I'm not bombarded with ads.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

It’s kind of like music. I used to have a collection of cookbooks to do exactly that, just like I used to have a collection of music in various formats as technology changes. But it’s too limiting. It can never compare to a digital search among all the world’s recipes/music.

My approach was to buy a recipe manager. I generally search online to find something new that looks interesting. But then I import it into my recipe manager so I can use it without all the life story, the excessive ads, the really annoying screen redraws to show yet more ads, the popped to display additional ads or the inline partial recipes that are more ads in disguise

[–] RoquetteQueen@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

I'd skip any with AI images for sure

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 5 points 1 week ago

If I'm searching for it, I limit searches to before 2024.

If I'm browsing a recipe site, I ignore recipes posted after 2024.

Im sure I'm missing a lot of good stuff, but I don't always know enough about cooking to know just by looking at the recipe that it doesn't work.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 2 points 1 week ago

If the page lacks a date (or has a recent one) then that's a pretty big tell. Same if they've posted dozens of recipes per day. Basically the same as YouTube videos.

[–] chrash0@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

generally speaking, i think it’s good practice to find several recipes and compare and contrast them. you’ll find opinions and get a sense for what the writer’s priorities are (quick, fewer dishes, what they usually have in the pantry, etc) and can figure out which writer has similar priorities to you. or just synthesize a recipe from those sources. this does require some technical know-how, but i think this is a good skill to have.

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I wonder if the first "AI generated" recipe was the birthday cake in Portal (actually written by humans, but recited by an AI who it's insinuated made the recipe). This recipe includes broken glass, so you kinda know it's not real.

At the end (not really a spoiler), they show a black forest cake, which is delicious. The recipe given obviously does not make a black forest cake, even setting aside the joke comments like the broken glass.

The problem I see is that sooner rather than later, the problems will be so small that most home cooks won't catch the problem until it's too late.

The bigger problem is that if experienced cooks can be taught it's wrong (e.g. something like swapping baking soda for baking powder), why can't the AI, assuming the AI's goal is actually to help you. I feel like we are at a point with AI that if I ask for a recipe with very specific requirements, it should either be able to conjure up the recipe, or tell me why it can't be done so I can change the parameters equivalent (e.g. you can't ask for a steak to be vegan, that simply does not compute).

[–] alternategait@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

A simplified version of how LLM AI works is that it has "read" all the books in the world, and selects the most likely next word/sentence. This can look a lot like knowing, but there's no reasoning or sythesis behind it, which is why it can't be "taught" that baking powder leads to a more sour outcome than baking soda.

AI has no goals. The companies that program and release AI have the goals of keeping you engaged with the AI.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I’ve seen some with impossible cook times but I assume that’s just different ingredient expectations or something.

For example I want to look up a time and temperature to cook chicken breasts but the time is impossibly short. At that temperature it may take 2-3x the time. Are we already at the point of ai recipes with unnoticeable flaws or do “chicken breasts” mean something very different in different places? Or maybe it’s a flawed conversion from metric?

[–] elephantium@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

just different ingredient expectations or something

No, it's fundamental to the way LLMs (don't) work. Take 10 random pages from a cookbook. Look at the cook times. I'm guessing the "impossible" times you've noticed will be within the range of times from the random cookbook.

The LLM doesn't actually know anything about cooking; it's just mashing together something plausible based on 1000 previous cookbooks.

[–] Janx@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago

Maybe it's pressure cooker times?