this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2026
392 points (99.0% liked)

News

37375 readers
1860 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Just eight billionaires accounted for a quarter of the gains, led by Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Larry Ellison and Larry Page

The richest 500 individuals in the world added a record $2.2tn to their wealth in 2025, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, with just eight billionaires accounting for a quarter of the gains.

The gains increased their collective net worth to $11.9tn, bolstered by billionaire Donald Trump’s 2024 election victory and booming markets in cryptocurrencies, equities and metals.

Around a quarter of the gains were attributed to eight billionaires, including Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Oracle chair Larry Ellison and Alphabet Inc co-founder Larry Page, though 2024 saw more concentrated net worth gains with the same eight billionaires making up 43% of total net worth gains for the wealthiest 500 individuals in the world.

all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fonix232@fedia.io 103 points 3 months ago

"Added" my ass. They STOLE $2.2tn from the working people. They literally took it out from the mouths of starving families, struggling single mothers and fathers, while providing little to no value for all their greed.

[–] AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world 52 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Hoarding currency is a mental illness.

[–] BoJackHorseman@piefed.social 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Splanda@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

"Plastic surgery can fix that right up. Don't worry, it's on the house"

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 38 points 3 months ago (3 children)

At this point reality needs a maximum high score. Like, you make $100 billion and the arguments about taxes just stop, you just literally do not make any more money, because why.

What good society would allow this? When seen what it is - literally human life turned into currency through effort - I find it hard to explain letting one person horde this much without using the word "evil."

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Every year society should take the top 3 billionaires and forcibly redistribute all of their wealth. Let them fight each other for #4

[–] AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I like where your head's at.

[–] velindora@lemmy.cafe 8 points 3 months ago

I like where their heads will roll to.

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

The Billionaire Games. I like it.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Ditch the score entirely. Let’s cooperate instead of compete.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I think this is exactly why the likes of Thiel stroke off to things like the book The Sovereign Individual. Or get giddy when they hear the ramblings of that idiot Curtis Yarvin.

They imagine a world where they can put their wealth entirely beyond the reach of anyone, no matter what. They think that government is just about buying protection/services at the lowest cost in order to preserve wealth, and they should pay nothing above that.

That's the basic thrust of The Sovereign Individual, really - that the wealthy "creatives" LOL are having all their gains stolen to support people that are just unworthy and they are paying way too much to the "welfare state", etc. The "sovereign individual" should be able to pick up their money and go anywhere that is willing to offer up their "services" at the very lowest cost, and with things like digital currency, no nasty governments should be able to get at that money - ironically, these people are basically talking about "open borders", but only for the very high-performing people, the people they naturally assume are themselves, of course. Everyone else should be stuck in increasingly failed high-tax welfare states where there is no one else to "exploit" by taxation, etc...

They live in constant fear that a population may actually wake the fuck up, and actually elect people that can do something about all those ill-gotten gains and undue influence and dream about a scenario where they can just float wherever and no one is allowed to touch their precious.

[–] AlternatePersonMan@lemmy.world 37 points 3 months ago

If I mathed right, that's roughly $8,800 per U.S. citizen. That is truly fucked up.

Parasites masquerading as geniuses.

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago
[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 months ago (2 children)

And how much did they contribute back to the countries that allowed them to amass that ridiculous amount of wealth?

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 months ago

Haha, you're funny

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Their "contributions" are about breaking the countries that gave them everything they have, and fucking over nearly everyone in those countries.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 months ago

So when are we finally going to stop this, stop the billionaires?

We need laws that put hard caps on ownership and personal wealth. Nobody should be able to have a net worth of over, say, 10 million dollars. Any income over that should be taxed 100% until the person goes below the 10 million line

We done even need different economic systems, capitalism works well to generate wealth, that is fine, we just need to put rules on where that wealth goes.

With taxes, that is a simple fix.

Imagine if you will, if nobody can be worth over 10M, and companies het similarly capped at, say, 1 billion.

You have a company worth 1 billion? You can't have a single owner because of the 10M cap. You'll end up with many ay more smaller companies or bigger companies with loads of small share holders. Companies can compete and grow but the perverse incentives of endless growth would be gone. Companies can finally focus on the end consumers again, and make better products

Meanwhile governments get a huge tax influx, that can be used to fund independent investment foundations that help new startups with funding and professional help to get your new company started

That tax money could be used as well to fund free healthcare, free education, maybe even universal income. We could eradicate the poor.

People could stop focusing on survival and start focusing on living and loving.

I dunno, there are loads of details missing, of course, but this sounds like something doable.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Well it’s sure starting to look like guillotine thirty

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago
[–] peaceful_world_view@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

They didn't add jack shit, they stole from the workers.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Government is our only defense against robber barons. If any government allows itself to be controlled by billionaires, there's NO REASON for the government. It's just a super expensive middleman.

[–] wickedrando@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago

It’s incredible they all work so hard while also shit posting 24/7 and dressing like trash.

[–] tehsillz@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

People still give them money

[–] girthero@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I don't understand why shareholders keep feeding these pieces of shit.

[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

What's fucked up is there is a Bloomberg Billionaires Index. What the fuck is this hero worship slobbering

[–] Janx@piefed.social 2 points 3 months ago

Gee, wonder where it came from.

[–] paperazzi@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

That's nothing. In 2026 they'll at least double that, guaranteed.

What's the number after trillion? Might as well find out soon because there is no stopping the greed juggernaut.

[–] _Nico198X_@europe.pub 2 points 3 months ago

ah good, a list

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

there's multiple ways to deal with that. i just want to name a few:

  • in the past, many countries in europe did it like that that companies are still privately owned, but the companies have to fulfill government-dictated regulation, such as restricting environmental pollution, making sure working conditions for humans are safe, making sure human workers have enough holidays and time off, and such
  • a possible alternative that's often discussed is repossessing the companies entirely, such that the companies become the possession of either the state or the people. i want to comment that there is essentially a mechanism to do this, which is taxation. taxation today is already a mechanism to move wealth from a person or organization to the state. it just has to actually be used properly.
  • i'm too lazy to list more options rn
[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Singapore has low taxes and high public spending, due to the government owning significant shares in all the major companies there. Public services are funded from the dividends. There's the added bonus that the government have people on the Board of Directors to prevent any anti-consumer or anti-competitive corporate shenanigans before they start, rather than having to challenge it in court later on.

The US or UK occasionally buy shares in companies to bail them out, but always flake out a few years later and sell them for a quick pre-election cash injection.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

yeah i'm actually a big fan of state-run companies, such as schools and medical facilities and transport companies (they are companies too, think about it. just not for-profit companies, but public-benefit companies). i'm even thinking it maybe could be extended a little further to make maybe 30% of the apartments in a city city-owned.