this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2025
251 points (96.7% liked)

politics

26894 readers
2654 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The US had to come to this point. We couldn’t go on as we were, even under Democratic presidents. For 40 years, a narrow economic elite has been siphoning off ever more wealth and power.

Over the last 40 years, starting with Ronald Reagan, the US went off the rails: deregulation, privatization, free trade, wild gambling by Wall Street, union-busting, monopolization, record levels of inequality, stagnant wages for most, staggering wealth for a few, big money taking over our politics.

America’s so-called “leadership class” is a sham. Most of them do not care a whit for the rest of the US. They are out for themselves.

The “fucking nightmare” is not over by any stretch. It’s likely to get worse in 2026 as Trump and his sycophants, and many of America’s “leaders”, realize 2026 may be their last unrestrained year to inflict damage and siphon off the spoils.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Xander707@lemmy.world 1 points 1 minute ago

There’s no solidarity amongst Americans. I think that’s the central issue.

The right wing fascist takeover has been in the making for decades, and a crucial part of that was capturing news outlets and turning them full bore propaganda. Control the narrative and condition 30+% of the population to believe anything the right wing regime says, and also condition them to distrust and hate anyone not on their side.

Because of this, we have little hope of unifying against the threat, even if things go bad. Troops in cities, people getting kidnapped off the streets and sent to foreign torture prisons, Epstein involvement and cover-ups, grifts, fraud, a self-enriching “president” who has made over 3 billion dollars in less than a year after re-election; all of these just by themselves would have sparked revolution in an older America, but today we are kept opposed at the class level because the brainwashing and conditioning of so many millions of Americans was successful and they will never turn on the people grifting them.

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 hours ago
[–] tym@lemmy.world 15 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

cute take. the reality is this: meals will have to be missed, family will have to die due to lack of healthcare coverage, and homes will have to be foreclosed before anything happens (at which point the deportation machine will be repurposed for denaturalized citizens).

this wasn't a quick transition. anyone who has been paying attention has seen the warning signs their entire lives. I'd argue that the offspring of korean war vets immediately turned on the previous generations' sacrifices and became hyper-individualistic (while teaching their offspring to be the same)

don't agree? look at black friday numbers during an authoritarian coup -- individualism is a disease and technology accelerated perpetual childhood (MINE!)

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

It will be gradual, and people will try to weather out the storm. Think, "The Grapes of Wrath" type of situation during the Great Depression.

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

As an American, I've protested. I don't believe the protests had any effect.

There are occasional ICE reactionaries, which, I think are great.

Unfortunately, vast majority of what I witness is just the "norm" everyday hustle. Yes, the house is burning down. I barely see anyone carrying a hose to the fire. I confess, I'm guilty of only a quick spray of a small kitchen extinguisher.

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Protests only work because of the implication that if things don't change, the people will force a change

[–] worhui@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Please don’t mistake the lack of immediate results with a lack of protest success.

It’s about growing the protest cause as much as the immediate effect.

Vietnam was much more personal to Americans with people directly seeing children and brothers turned to meat. Those protests took a decade to see effects.

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 6 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

LOL no they are not. Queue: “I have to work”, “I have to pay bills” etc etc the best they could do was two “protests” on weekends amidst a fascist takeover Americans have no clue what it is to protest or to resist. The next hunger pang is stronger than their willingness or ability to protest. Yet they yammer on endlessly about “mah rights” and “the 2nd amendment” 🤡💯

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

The people who yammer about that are the ones donning ICE gear.

My Dad was a huge 2A nut, specifically because he thought the government will come get him. But he was explicitly afraid of brown people - terrified of Obama and the 'radical leftists'. He prophesied that the Gummit was gonna let "illegals" take over the country, and "regular folk" wouldn't have a home left (ie, a white christian ethnostate, which he believed the US should be)

[–] bunchberry@lemmy.world 20 points 16 hours ago

Waking up to what? He can talk all he wants about corporate profits but can't say the words "capitalism" or "socialism." This article alone is evidence Americans are not waking up. Even the people who are forced to recon with the fact that a society that puts profits before people is bad cannot even articulate the possibility of an alternative to it.

[–] pirate2377@lemmy.zip 23 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

As much as I would love to believe the good in humanity, at this point I'm skeptical that even if 50% of the population started to resist the government that it would do anything. After all, both viable parties are in the pockets of the billionaires that bought our current government. So unless we have a straight up armed uprising, this will mean nothing.

[–] Crankenstein@lemmy.world 10 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Pretty much we need to change the entire system or nothing will change. You said it yourself, there are only two viable parties under our current system and they are both corrupt and serve the interests of our oppressors.

This is by design. The system of partisanship and electoralist statism, supported and maintained by the capitalist system of economics has never served our interests; it only ever served the interests of the ruling powers. They didn't buy the government. They built it.

And unfortunately, any time the people attempt to resist the overruling authority, that authority will engage in violence to keep their power. So a fight is inevitable if we ever want things to get better.

[–] bunchberry@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (3 children)

Much of the voting population still thinks the Democrats are the "good guys" who will save us. Even here on Lemmy, speaking ill of the Democrats often gets me downvoted. The portion of Americans who are actually anti-capitalist is pretty small. Even most the supposed "far leftists" just want to tax billionaires. There anti-capitalist movement in the USA is far too small to be influential, the only real organization being the DSA, but even then the DSA is composed of a mixture of socialists and liberals and so it is not a purely socialist organization.

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The problem I have with some people (a lot of people on Reddit, not sure about Lemmy I just started) is that people will take the Democrats fecklessness and say both sides are the same, so voting for either party makes no difference. It's literally a life and death difference if you are a from a certain caste.

You can say that both parties are a fundamental problem with this country in regards to corporate ownership, etc., while still acknowledging that the Republican party is currently trying to destroy democratic institutions and implement a fascist christian ethnostate.

[–] bunchberry@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

I don't acknowledge that the US has "democratic institutions."

[–] Crankenstein@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

I know. It's disheartening.

[–] pirate2377@lemmy.zip 1 points 14 hours ago

I feel like any strong opinions involving the democrats regardless of your side will get downvoted at this point. Democratic party is getting torn apart in general just like the Republican party right now

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 6 points 16 hours ago

Way I see it, people with nothing left to live for could attempt some crazy shit.

[–] bunchberry@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Even if Americans resisted, it wouldn't matter, because "resisting" doesn't do anything if it's not well-organized by some organization or party that can channel the resistance into positive change. A lot of countries in the past have had "uprisings" that are largely disorganized, and the result is that the protestors don't actually have any clear goals or anything to even potentially replace the sitting government, and so the sitting government just uses the protests as an excuse to oust another faction.

[–] pirate2377@lemmy.zip 1 points 14 hours ago

Well, it's either that or be oppressed under a fascist government. So its a lose-lose either way in this scenario. Unless the democrats suddenly turn left I guess

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 81 points 1 day ago

Americans are waking up.

[–] Rhoeri@piefed.world 16 points 23 hours ago

Remember: we’ve heard this before

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I still think the Sarah Palin floor - the 20-30-some percent of dead-enders that support Republicans no matter what they do - will likely never wake up.

[–] FearMeAndDecay@literature.cafe 9 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

It’s true that some people will always vote republican, but not enough for them to reliable win elections. Which means that if we can actually pass real progressive policies, like Medicare for all, then we can have the ratchet effect work in the other direction, dragging the republicans to the left. Because while some of their base will vote for them no matter what, the rest will cling on to their Medicare and will vote for a democrat if the republicans threaten to take it away

[–] bunchberry@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Expecting Democrats to pass Medicare for All is a bit of a pipe dream.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

We did in California. Sure it's just one state, but it is the most populous state.

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Wait what? Everyone in CA has Medicare?

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

MediCal. We've had that for years. It's not an ideal solution, but no one lacks insurance.

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

Holy crap brb moving to CA

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 5 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

before i start i want to make sure that this should in no way be interpreted as a “both sides” argument: i think yall should choose the most likely to win, least bad candidate (ie defensive voting; as disgusting as it is) - which almost certainly means a democrat at this point

i think it’s important to remember that both republican and democrats are relatively symmetrical in a lot of regards (not all). there are likely a similar number of people who actively support the democrats (distinct from defensive voting) no matter what, and they’d likely be equally problematic fixing systemic issues

perhaps they’d be easier to persuade, but it’s really easy to think that people on “our side” are governed by logic alone, but study after study has said that both sides are susceptible to propaganda and other political tools to a similar degree

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 66 points 1 day ago (1 children)

All I see is sullen acquiescence, as the Republicans have gone full fascist and the Democrats (at least 90% of them) are AWOL or pretending it's still business as usual. And the people are still taking orders, not taking over.

[–] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Give it some time. Whether intentional or unintentional, Trump has been teeing up economic collapse, and things are likely to come unglued in late 2026. Right-wingers have been harping on "the deficit" for decades, while doing nothing but increasing it. You can maintain a 2% budget deficit indefinitely so long as your economy grows by 3%. However, Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill" boosts the budget deficit to ~6%, and ~1/3 of U.S. debt matures in 2026 and will have to be rolled-over into new, higher rate bonds. However, notwithstanding the rapidly approaching massive growth in the cost of debt service, Trump's policies are shrinking the economy.

It is well known that population growth = economic growth, as each additional person contributes their labor and needs to buy food, housing, clothing, transportation, etc., etc. Conversely, shrinking the population by kicking out people contributing to the economy causes it to shrink, and Trump is kicking out people that help produce food and work in construction, not only shrinking the economy but also boosting the costs of production, contributing to inflation.

In addition, tariffs shrink foreign trade, and levying outrageous tariffs on other countries invites retaliation. Look at what has happened to soybean farmers with respect to China's purchase of soybeans and alcohol distillers with respect to Canadian purchases of alcohol.

While all of this sets the stage for a future financial crisis, in the same that a household maxing out its credit card debt, rolling it over each month on new credit sets up a personal financial crisis, as eventually you run out of credit cards willing to underwrite your risk, there is reason to believe that the crisis will come sooner rather than later. This is because Jerome Powell's term as Fed Chairman is up in May of 2026, and Trump will definitely put in a lackey that will do whatever Trump wants, rather than what is prudent for the U.S., and Trump has made it crystal clear that he wants the Fed to lower interest rates to juice the economy.

So what is going to happen is that there will be low demand for U.S. government bonds to refinance the debt, forcing higher rates to compensate for the risky financial position the U.S. is in and also forcing the Fed to buy them, effectively printing money. Add in the fact that the world no longer sees the U.S. as a reliable partner, and it will destroy the dollar, further reducing it's demand and causing a massive inflation spike, and a financial crisis at a level not seen since the Great Depression, with bank runs, etc. There is a reason that gold is in the greatest bull market of all time, and continues to make new all-time highs. It's because central banks are shifting away from dollar assets (central banks now hold more gold than U.S. treasuries), and individuals are looking to protect their assets. We will likely have a "melt up" (massive stock market spike) as people scramble to get out of dollars and into harder assets, and then a collapse. I expect gold to top $8K in 2026. Buckle up, because we're living in interesting times!

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 hours ago

This will also conveniently be when the AI bubble pops.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] shittydwarf@piefed.social 37 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

Yeah, but you can imagine what it would be like if they were.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] butwhyishischinabook@piefed.social 52 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This would be nice if true, but I'm very hesitant to believe that this time is different since we're on year 9 of centrist Democrats claiming that "the fever is about to break."

[–] Balaquina@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I feel like people using this analogy are forgetting that fevers don't always break. Sometimes they kill you.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

fevers break if your immune system attacks and destroys the threat. if the infection wins, you die. if you’re immunocompromised and get a fever, it’s very very bad news

i’m not saying that the democrats are compromised and they’re the immune system in this analogy of course… no no no… im just commenting on the biology!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 8 points 23 hours ago
[–] GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Were it not for that painful national exposure to racist brutality, we wouldn’t have gotten the Civil Rights Act or the Voting Rights Act.

Yeah so how those holding up nowadays? Gains should not be able to be ripped back, as Donnie is doing now. We shouldn’t have to fight AGAIN for that which has been won.

But if those are the rules, Dems need to grind this Republican trash into the dirt to the point that even if take backs are allowed there are none of them left to do it.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 day ago

The price of freedom is eternal vigilance. That which can be gained can always be lost if we grow complacent, which we did.

load more comments
view more: next ›