this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2025
211 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26819 readers
3402 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

The pardon of Changpeng Zhao, founder of cryptocurrency exchange Binance, drew scrutiny after lobbyists were paid approximately $800,000 before the pardon was granted.

According to Forbes, Zhao is the richest Canadian and the 21st-richest person in the world, with a net worth estimated at $88.0 billion as of October 2025

Literally peanuts. Paying bribes this cheap it's a no brainer. Compared to the median American net worth it's like paying $2.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago

If there isn’t some law created to stop these quid pro quo pardons then the presidential pardons should be removed.

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 24 points 9 hours ago

Jackson called it. Unchecked power and running criminals enterprise out of WH.

GOP is a joke.

[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 13 points 9 hours ago

Hey look, the shithole banana republic is doing shithole banana republic things again!

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 67 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It’s time to get rid of pardons.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 36 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

I never really understood WHY the president got to pardon people if the idea behind america is that nobody is above justice there. I mean i know its a LIE, but like lie better.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 22 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

There are good reasons, but those reasons only exist in some utopia once in a lifetime bullshit crap, like pardoning draft dodgers for Vietnam.

Apart from that it seems its always been used for absolute bullshit

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago

There are good reasons

So says everyone, but WHAT ARE those reasons?

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 5 points 10 hours ago

I didn’t even know that Carter did that. Fucking good. Drafting people into such an overtly bullshit war was straight up evil.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

The purpose is, ostensibly, to prevent some form of miscarriage of justice or an over harsh sentencing. Think the guy who they tried to charge with a felony for harmlessly throwing a sandwich at a federal officer, if they had managed to convict instead of failing to even get an indictment. Or it could also be used to retroactively forgive people convicted of breaking a law that has since been overturned. Like if they decriminalize weed possession, those already convicted while the law was in place don't automatically get their sentences overturned.

But it is a power that should be rarely needed, judiciously applied, and have sensible guardrails on it. But the founders were confident that the people wouldnt elect self centered autocrats, that congress and the courts wouldn't be filled with sycophants, opportunists, and cowards, and that the public wouldn't stand for blatant corrupt uses of presidential powers. But here we are.

Frankly, if we can't stop blatantly corrupt abuse of the pardon powers or even have basic limitations on it (like no self pardons) then that power should be amended out of the constitution.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 2 points 9 hours ago

Many of the founders of the USA were themselves self centred autocrats so I’m not entirely certain that the system isn’t working exactly as intended.

[–] ToiletFlushShowerScream@piefed.world 23 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Help me understand why presidential pardons exist?

[–] pheonixdown@sh.itjust.works 36 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

More or less the same reason jury nullification exists, just concentrated on executive leadership. The problem isn't that it exists, the problem is the bribery and ethical issues. Theoretically, if the executive is abusing the power, the legislature is supposed to remove them, but since we no longer operate in a system where that will happen... Here we are.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 2 points 6 hours ago

Jury nullification doesn't exist by intentional design.

Its simply a function of not being able to prosecute jurors for their decisions.

I guess its similar to pardons in that the system is based on the assumption that no one would abuse these caveats.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago

The Taco Crime Family.

[–] Ininewcrow@piefed.ca 15 points 12 hours ago

Sounds more like a Christmas special for oligarchs ... that's a pretty cheap price for a billionaire.