this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2025
552 points (98.9% liked)

People Twitter

8902 readers
268 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive link: https://web.archive.org/web/20251220153809/https://bsky.app/profile/dansinker.com/post/3ma5afu7rm22i

You notice the Uline logo in the background. Wonder why JD Vance is standing in front of it? It's because Uline is one of the biggest donors to the GOP. In 2024 they spent over $146 million on Republicans.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 99 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Funny, this article (archive) about the rent prices dropping seems to have another take on the reason.

The historic surge in multifamily construction over the past few years is now pulling back, but a good supply of new units is still coming online at a time of much weaker demand.

So there is a glut of new rentals available due to historic levels of construction and...

“That 18- to 34-year-old group … I think it’s up to 32.5% of those now are living with family, and that’s the highest it’s been in a while,” said Grant Montgomery, CoStar’s national director of multifamily analytics. “I think it reflects high rental costs that have risen over the years, as well as the tougher job market for young folks just coming out of college.”

“That is where a lot of demand traditionally comes from, the core renter demand is from that sort of younger base,” he said.

Younger workers can't afford to move out of their parents home because they can't find a job they pays enough to do so, or any job at all in many cases.

Yeah, that makes more sense than Trump's criminal efforts to kick anyone brown or black out of the country.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 48 points 3 weeks ago

This fucking here.

I'm about to accept an offer for 30% less than what I made before. Because the economy fucking sucks.

I used to be able to save on top of my living expenses but I will, for first time since right after graduating, be living more or less paycheck to paycheck.

It's a fucking travesty.

[–] 0ops@piefed.zip 94 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Remember when we used to joke about how politicians should wear their sponsors proudly like a racecar driver? Remember when that was just satire?

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Hell, remember between 2003 to 2007 when the DNC had effectively banned money from politics? Remember the SCOTUS striking it down?

[–] adminofoz@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

At first, I thought this was satire. I still don't believe it, but I am willing to be persuaded by new information. Do you or anyone who knows much about this have links or even the name of the legislation?

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 written by DNC and introduced multiple times between 1995 and 2002,

The Citizens United v. FEC Decision granted in 2008 and finalized in 2010.

A quick summary is on Wikipedia.

It wasn't perfect, mind you, but since its stop being granted starting in 2008 the election spending has ballooned dramatically.

[–] adminofoz@lemmy.cafe -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Im with you on Citizens United being a nightmare but if I understand your argument and your chart you are saying 100s of millions per election to politicians equals "banned money in politics." Is that correct?

If so I dont believe we mean the same thing when we say those words.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

It banned PACs and Corporations from spending on and engaging with campaigns, so yes, it removed money from politics.

Would the world not be so much better without oil companies and AIPAC running elections?

[–] adminofoz@lemmy.cafe 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I agree with you on banning PACs and corps from spending on and engaging in campaigns.

My point is you aren't going far enough. If you think $100 million spent for a candidate in 2002 is an ideal worth striving for or somehow equal to no money in politics, you are in for disappointment or you don't remember that era well enough.

This still nearly entirely excluded normal people from becoming a candidate. Corporations were still writing our laws during that time through lobbying. Not to mention a dozen other in roads for money in politics during that era, such as insider trading.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 41 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

What even is that message? Ousting a few thousand people out of homes, where many of those homes remain occupied anyway, somehow causes rents to go down?

That's not how any of this works.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 17 points 3 weeks ago

It's just emotional slop, like everything from from conservatives is

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Corporations and foreign nationals buying up single family homes whole-ass neighborhoods at a time in order to price gouge the market utilizing soulless AI driven collusion software? Nah, couldn’t be the problem. Poor people living six-seven adults to a home however…

If Republican voters had more than one brain cell to rub together they’d be very upset by all this.

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

that same shit is going down in plenty of completely dem-controlled cities, where do you think they perfect all these greedy schemes before pushing them out across the whole country?

[–] BigDaddySlim@lemmy.world 26 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Uline sends out a lot of big thick catalogs to businesses, and they're terrible about keeping an up to date mailing list. I get joy discarding them when they send them to vacant buildings (they're 3rd class mail), and more joy when the few I do deliver go straight to the trash by the customers I deliver them to.

At the Post Office we call them the Urines, because they piss everyone off.

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

I used one of those to start my grill for years

[–] limelight79@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

We've gotten a few of those catalogs, and I looked through them out of curiosity. It always seemed to me that their prices are high, or at least no better than other sources.

I don't remember specifics, but a few things I looked at were cheaper on Amazon or other sources; often it was the exact same item with a different brand name on it.

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 23 points 3 weeks ago

Probably easier to make a list of companies that aren't GOP donors

[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago

Did anyone's landlord call them and say the rent payment can be lower now? Anyone??

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 weeks ago

This has Four Seasons Landscaping vibes

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago

Uline? More like U-Lyin'

[–] y0kai@anarchist.nexus 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

When i was working for a company that did a lot of shipping last year, i moved them away from uline and ended up saving them a bunch of money. I still got laid off because they "couldnt afford to keep me" (despite them being a multibillion dollar organization...) but least i got to tell uline to go fuck themselves.

[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

I've done the same at my job. Screw uline. They overcharge on products and shipping to pay for their GOP donations.

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I've never heard of ULINE in my life

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Chances are you see their products every day.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Me neither.

[–] PKscope@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

I just started a new job in the packaging industry and I'm happy to say they are a competitor. I get to hate them for multiple reasons now. Nice.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Going to be an odd question but if I need 700 paper bags, 50 wooden boxes, and a giant roll of bubble wrap next weekend can somebody reccomend a place?

[–] ChogChog@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago

Never knew the affiliation before now but a quick search shows it’s apparently big enough that there’s a whole website dedicated to alternatives

[–] TheJesusaurus@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

He giving out houses? Thought that was commulism

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

No, they're just illegally removing people from houses...which is fascism

[–] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The source of all your discontents is that you're fighting for a limited set of resources, says a landlord that owns multiple properties.

[–] Quexotic@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 weeks ago

Just going to leave this here... https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.goodsuniteus.goods

I've been using it for a while to try to shop more ethically, realizing that there is no ethical consumption.

[–] Finalsolo963@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Genuinely what is the alternative to them? Like, is there another company that offers standardized shelving/totes/general logistics supplies that isn't also in bed with republicans (and maybe isn't as awful to their workers as uline)?

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I've used upaknship in the past. I find bigger boxes at Staples if you buy 5 it's way cheaper. I've heard American bubble boy is good for bubble wrap, but if you're shipping a lot you should get a machine.

[–] Finalsolo963@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm thinking more for like, warehouse type stuff. Not so much for shipping as storage/organization.

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

I would try to find bulk straight from the manufacturer if it's things like shrink wrap or slip sheets or whatever. Uline is just a middleman.

[–] pieland@piefed.social 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)
[–] Finalsolo963@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, that helps a lot. Knowing that Grainger/McMaster-Carr aren't throwing money behind neo-nazis is a big help.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago

The post office?

[–] rageagainstmachines@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Is there a massive list or database of all the companies that are still funding this administration?

[–] morriscox@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

And don't ship with DHL unless you want to risk your shipment getting rerouted all over the place.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 weeks ago

Damn it, I had actually managed to forget about Vance these last few weeks.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Feces. They have good stuff. There should be a list of substitutes if you want a boycott to work.

load more comments
view more: next ›