Do you think he gets a fair take or was it a massive shitpost campaign against the first bad...
not a -
King?
this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2025
70 points (100.0% liked)
History Memes
1328 readers
1264 users here now
A place to share history memes!
Rules:
-
No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.
-
No fascism (including tankies/red fash), atrocity denial or apologia, etc.
-
Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.
-
Follow all Piefed.social rules.
Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world
OTHER COMMS IN THE HISTORYVERSE:
- !historymusic@quokk.au
- !historygallery@quokk.au
- !historymemes@piefed.social
- !historyruins@piefed.social
- !historyart@piefed.social
- !historyartifacts@piefed.social
- !historyphotos@piefed.social
founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
didn't he declare war on the sea/poseidon and order his legion to collect seashells as 'trophies'?
In his (possible) defense, it's suggested that he did so as punishment for the troops for some slight or another.
"I'm going to humiliate you, the military, the core pillar of my rule, to establish how absolute my authority is" is slightly (slightly) less insane than "I think attacking the tides will drive back Neptune"
This makes it seem much more comical. And in all honesty, send like a fairly harmless punishment.
Enter someone telling me a few soldiers drowned.
Not to be glib but, declared war on the – s̶e̶a̶ || drugs – is there a difference? Both are abstract in a similar sense. A war on drugs will likely age into equivalent absurdity. Both are cultural schemas.
"the war on drugs" was mostly rhetoric. Like "The war on cancer" or "The war on childhood hunger" or whatever social ill they're on about. The idea against 'fighting' a social ill has always been part of the rhetoric, to express a desire to do something about that social ill. Sometimes, the efforts are well meaning (like Biden's cancer research stuff being 'a war on cancer',) and sometimes they're not (Like the GOP's war on woke)
Or, perceived social ill.
Trump, though is a moron and expects his base to be even dumber than he is. So when he declares a "drugs" are an "invasion" and "terrorist attack" or whatever batshit crazy lunacy he's peddling... he actually thinks people will just go with it. And the sad part here is, even if his base recognizes that he's confusing rhetoric for reality... they'll still go with it.
I'll leave it to history to decide who was more batshit insane- Caligula or Trump.
Combover Caligula
is a moron and expects his base to be even dumber than he is.
His base ate up so much propaganda already, I don't think that assumption is actually in error. They either actually believe his constant stream of shit, or they voted for him despite that - neither of which make them look particularly smart.
You're not wrong, really. I guess my point is that Trump thinks he's the smartest person in the room.
also just a word of caution... a steady stream of propaganda (even blatant propaganda) will have everyone starting to believe it... eventually. just the way the human brain is wired. You hear something portrayed as fact often enough for long enough, it starts to sink in. especially if you don't have something balancing it out. They don't seek the truth out because it's hard to actually find it (Seriously. My grandma lives in missouri. Fox news is the progressive news service. She still believes minneapolis is a war zone, ever since the floyd riots. Even though I've taken her around to the memorial and showed her how that's not true. She agreed for about a year or so. but it sunk back in.)
Fair enough, it's worth pointing out that propaganda does work. On top of that, I don't think Trump is a complete idiot - he is a competent manipulator, there's a method to his madness. Not quite a mastermind, but the fascist takeover wouldn't have worked nearly as well if they chose someone less charismatic as their face.
Unfairness was probably involved, but the essentials are almost certainly true - that he was an arbitrary autocrat who was deeply unliked by both the Senate and the people of Rome.