this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2025
63 points (98.5% liked)

Fuck AI

6873 readers
822 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
VerbFlow@lemmy.world
MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
TootSweet@lemmy.world
BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world
cynar@lemmy.world
drmeanfeel@lemmy.world
pavnilschanda@lemmy.world
CriticalMedicine@lemmy.world
WonderfulWanderer@lemmy.world
Communist@lemmy.ml
eatCasserole@lemmy.world
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
NutWrench@lemmy.world
Soup@lemmy.cafe
iAvicenna@lemmy.world
Tinks@lemmy.world
wizblizz@lemmy.world
corus_kt@lemmy.world
Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
TrickDacy@lemmy.world
TheFriar@lemm.ee
ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com
HawlSera@lemm.ee
andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works
33550336@lemmy.world
Nougat@fedia.io
Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
Quill7513@slrpnk.net
glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz
e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social
63
AI-authored code needs more attention, contains worse bugs (www.theregister.com)
submitted 4 months ago by falseWhite@lemmy.world to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
3 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

On average, AI-generated pull requests (PRs) include about 10.83 issues each, compared with 6.45 issues in human-generated PRs. That's about 1.7x more when AI is involved, meaning longer code reviews and increased risk of defects.

Problems caused by AI-generated PRs also tend to be more severe than human-made messes. AI-authored PRs contain 1.4x more critical issues and 1.7x more major issues on average than human-written PRs, the report says.

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/42624268

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Who woulda thunk... Btw, it's machine-learning, not AI.

[–] RunJun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This is a losing battle. Just like developers calling multiplayer tests ‘alphas’.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

I'll forevermore consider it a basic IQ test...