this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2025
47 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10788 readers
622 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“We have been promised for decades that handouts to business are going to get us more and better jobs.”

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The trickle up economy.

The people pay the government taxes, and the government hands out tax money to companies so that the shareholder value goes up.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

You know, I hear this so much, I have to wonder why we're not all trading stock tips. You too can be a shareholder.

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Because the amount of money the general populace has vs the money corpos are putting is very low.

If you can't even make ends meet, how are you supposed to buy on the stockmarket

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Given the typical Lemmy demographic, there's a high chance my income is actually the lowest here. It isn't "I can't afford a single share".

In reality, I'm guessing you haven't looked at what the returns are, you just kind of assume they're crazy. And it's the same return for every shareholder, whether me or Jeff Bezos.

[–] twopi@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago

It literally depends. There are multiple types of shares. For example in Canada, the Rogers Corporation has Class A and Class B shares on the TSX. Class A has voting rights, Class B does not. Class A is majority owned by the Rogers family. Class B is more expensive, because in an extremely unlikely event that Rogers goes bankrupt, Class B gets paid first.

Furthermore, the big difference is not buying one share. The problem is that the distribution of shares is do unequal and concentrates so much wealth in the top 0.1% (let alone the top 1%).

See chart: https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/z1/dataviz/dfa/compare/chart/

[–] kat_angstrom@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

Yes, because enough is never enough for corporations. No matter how many tax breaks, rewritten laws, and repealed regulations, they will not and can not be satisfied.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago

Is Big Business spending more on groceries every year? Oh, maybe housing costs are getting to be too much?

Fuck Big Business. They can rot in hell.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yeah, ever since industrial interventionism became cool again the news has just been saturated with lobbyists (calling themselves "industry groups") explaining why they need taxpayer funding.

It's to be expected, I guess. With any luck it usually won't work.

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago

Silly Rabbit, welfare is for the rich.