this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2025
188 points (89.5% liked)

Today I Learned

26644 readers
174 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 86 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Third cousin, 16 times removed encompasses pretty much the entire population.

[–] DaCrazyJamez@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 weeks ago

Think you got that backwards. [Third] cousin means distance in relation, "[N] removed" refers to how many generations apart they are.

[–] KitB@feddit.uk 10 points 3 weeks ago

IIRC, third cousin is pretty close, n times removed is just generation gap. I mean it makes little difference, genetically, but being that close to a royal within written history is probably a good indication of generational wealth.

[–] limer@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 weeks ago

I once heard that everyone on earth is 42nd cousin or closer

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 58 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] Enzy@feddit.nu 16 points 3 weeks ago

Very, very, veeery distant relative's.

[–] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 weeks ago

Absolutely nothing!

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 27 points 3 weeks ago

A true nepo baby.

[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 25 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

LMAO @ third cousin 16 times removed.

I had to Google that shit. It means:

A third cousin 16 times removed is an extremely distant relative, meaning you share common great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-grandparent

What I want to know is how many 3rd cousins 16 times removed Brigham Young has? The dude had 50 ~~wives~~ child sex slaves and 450 children.

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Kinda sorta. Cousins mean you share grandparents. Second cousins share great-grandparents. Third cousins share great-great-grandparents.

The the "removed" refers to generations. My first cousin's kid is my first cousin, once removed. His kid (my cousin's grandparent) will be my first cousin, twice removed. So 16x removed would be 14x great-grandparent/child.

In other words, Benedict Cumberbatch's 14x great-grandparent shared a great-great-grandparent with... Was it a king we were talking about? I already forgot OP.

[–] TheJesusaurus@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 weeks ago

laughs in temujin

[–] ComradeMiao@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Honestly, if you can find one famous person in your ancestry you can probably find you're related to anyone in Western history. IDK about Richard III but I can find many kings of England and presidents of the US I'm related to.

[–] ValiantDust@feddit.org 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I remember a professor at uni telling us that at some time in the future each of us will either be the ancestor of every living human or of none.

Equally, if you go back far enough, you will find a common ancestor with every other living person, thus making us all related.

While that seems unintuitive – what about the members of some remote tribe without contact to civilisation? –, keep in mind that even the most remote tribe has to have contact with some neighbouring people . Otherwise they wouldn't have enough genetic diversity. And those neighbours are in contact with their neighbours and so on.

Edit: Changed "intuitive" to "unintuitive"... Oops

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] ValiantDust@feddit.org 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's exclusively through the matrilineal line though. The most recent ancestor is much more recent.

But your article linked to what I was referring to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identical_ancestors_point (and the mitochondrial Eve is a cool concept either way)

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Agreed about the concept being cool.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Just another goddamned nepo baby, then? I knew it.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 4 points 3 weeks ago

His parents are both longstanding actors, and appeared as his parents in Sherlock.

[–] notsosure@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That’s a coincidence! A few years back my mother told me I’m the third cousin, 15 times removed from Melania Trump.

[–] kata1yst@sh.itjust.works 25 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Removed essentially means "separated by a generation", so I doubt you're 15 generations removed from Melania.

I assume it's more like 15th cousin 3 times removed.

[–] notsosure@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Us you are right! Mea culpa.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 5 points 3 weeks ago

I imagine many Brits are, they're just unable to pay for cousin reattachment surgery.

[–] Nanook@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 weeks ago

Everybody related. Charlemagne is your great grandaddy. Get over it.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If all men are brothers, would you want one to marry your sister?

[–] ValiantDust@feddit.org 3 points 3 weeks ago

To bring it back to Shakespeare:

Adam's sons are my brethren, and truly I hold it a sin to match in my kindred.

[–] KittenBiscuits@lemmy.today 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Was that the guy they found under a carpark several years back? The king, not the actor.

Yes! Here's a nice summary of the recovery. https://www.thearchaeologist.org/blog/the-discovery-of-king-richard-iiis-burial-site

If youre a history buff, I highly recommend History Calling's video on Richard III and the loss and recovery of his body. It's lengthy but well researched and has lots of interesting context.

[–] Quilotoa@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The whole island is inbred.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 2 points 3 weeks ago

Not true, there are also a few immigrants holding on for dear life!

[–] BigBrownBeaver@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Why was he removed sixteen times?

[–] Codpiece@feddit.uk 2 points 3 weeks ago

I’ve a hunch I am too.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

I'm your 19th cousin twice removed

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago

Interesting

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 1 points 3 weeks ago

Let's be serious, there's a reason that island is known for its close ties.

[–] gaiussabinus@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yes, didn't Richard the III play himself in black adder?