Let's see what Charlie Kirk has to say about this:
Unless he stood up in a crowded room and yelled out "I HATE BLACK PEOPLE" he's NOT racist 
this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2025
141 points (100.0% liked)
Slop.
744 readers
684 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Next: "hey, you're taking him out of context when he said 'i am a nazi, death to the subhumans,' he didn't mean it like that"
Unless he stood up in a crowded room and yelled out "I HATE BLACK PEOPLE" he's NOT racist
The right: That's not racist either, wait hear me out!
And this that shit that has chuds being like "He didn't say he hated them though specifically, he just said the civil rights act was a mistake which could mean anything" and thats the fucken point where I just start slappin'
Admittedly while my response would be entirely unhelpful in fixing people's stupid views, I'd be hugely tempted to tell them that in future white people will become a minority and the civil rights act can then be repealed and white people can see what it was like living as a minority in a discriminating country; admittedly entirely unhelpful but I really hate people like this
[insert any progressive policy] was a mistake which could mean anything" and thats the fucken point where I just start slappin'
Then they should stop fuckin' cryin' when they hear about land reform in South Africa.
See, these mfers are bad faith fuckers, the likes of antisemites that Sartre condemned (to use that damned quote)
They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words.
They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.”
On a brighter note that, that reform is South Africa is hopefully lit. I hope they can gain some independance and nothing bad comes of this. But I have only learned about it from one of my friends and I myself dont know too much about the situation.
They think (or rather, pretend to think) that someone has to look into a camera and say “I am racist” to be racist.
They’re such spineless cowards.
just because somebody’s a racist it doesn’t automatically make them a racist. you don’t sound as open minded as you think you are mr tolerant leftist
Hey, Kirk did one really great thing for minorities: he got shot.
Not even Tucker would fail that QTE
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
The most honest defense of Charlie Kirk is that he was probably too stupid to understand the social ramifications of being a racist chud fuckhead. Kinda like a child. That is the sole charitable interpretation. That he was personally racist but too dumb to realize he was empowering other racists.
Edit: I don’t buy this, for the record
If love is a verb, then so is hate
