this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2025
402 points (98.6% liked)

politics

26881 readers
2170 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bonifratz@piefed.zip 186 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This is NOT just, ‘Trump being Trump.’ It’s Trump being classless.

...where have you been the last, like, 79 years? Trump is classlessness personified.

[–] testfactor@lemmy.world 32 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Before I even looked I said, "I bet it's Russell Moore." He's been vocally anti-Trump since before his first term. Even got fired from the SBC ERLC for it.

So he's been there the whole time, basically. This isn't a reversal for him.

Edit: I hadn't actually read the article yet. That quote is David Brody. I just assumed the whole article would be about Russell Moore.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

"...but I'd still vote for him."

- every evangelical leader

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 37 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, our entire generation, as in everyone alive today, is going to be viewed as ape-like knuckle dragging dipshits by future generations, assuming they aren't even more stupid than we are.

That's our legacy in the annals of history. Dipshits.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ah that's not true. Have you visited countries that were formerly ruled by dictatorial governments? Everyone knows that the average citizen wasn't responsible for national level badness. There's no judgment on the ordinary person, because blaming the victims is rather pointless.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

How many of those countries democratically elected those dictators with full knowledge of who they were and what they were planning?

[–] logi@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago
[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago

Fucking evangelicals are one of the reasons this shit is happening. Take the blame for this immoral shitscape, too, Russell.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The shame of our generation is both the cons and the pinnacle of everything they've been working toward and dreaming about: Taco himself.

It's much more than just one post from this POS; his very existence and the conservative backing of him as a so-called "President" is the real shame.

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 19 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Lol what? The dude is a pedophile, but a social media post about a celebrity death is the real shame?

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

He is the shame of our country, personified

[–] KelvarCherry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 weeks ago

Well, this is coming from an Evangelical. Pedophilia is fairly common in those spheres.

[–] The_Lurker@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

No, just adds to it. One more disappointment in a litany of disappointments. He will never be held responsible until his dying day. So social outrage is the only consequence of note.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I know they despised each other, but the Reiners aren't even in the ground yet. Have some respect for his surviving family you stinky cankleoid.

[–] Kushan@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

But remember, the conservatives are better because they don't celebrate the deaths of people they don't like, unlike the left who made light of Charlie Kirk's death.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're both out of control, our parties should be dismantled and dissolved.

[–] Kushan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes, you have a problem with that? Or should I have said "our party" since they swap terms every four to eight years?

I stand corrected, okay, "our party" it is.

[–] Kushan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well. I'm not American, so....

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Oh, we were talking about Trump who is the President of America.

So, be more pedantic! It's fun, I do it too

[–] Kushan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh are non Americans not allowed to talk about US politics, is that how it works?

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

They sure can! But they should be aware when anyone in any thread says "our blah blah blah" when talking about American politics, they mean Americans. We can't spell every tiny detail out for you, it goes without saying that "our.... " in a thread about Americans and an American politician, this is referring to those the thread is about.

Just like in my response to you, I say "they" rather than "non-americans not allowed to talk about US politics." Because I am responding to you, and you should know who I am referring to. Certainly, I'm not talking about everyone on Earth.

THIS is how it works. Whatever country or political system and so on are the subject of the thread, when speaking of those who are involved in voting or parties or citizens and so on, "our" should be adequate for all readers without further explanation.

Do you understand?

[–] Kushan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Or, just saying, how about you don't babe assumptions about people's politics? To save yourself the embarrassment 😉

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I didn't make any assumptions, just telling you how it works, friendo.

Why would I be embarrassed? You're the one who doesn't know, I am being kind by teaching you. :P

[–] Kushan@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You assumed I was American and supported a certain political party. Did you forget?

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No such assumption or claim was made at any time, please pay attention!

YOU were in a thread about US politics and President Trump, and acted like you don't know what "our" means in that context.

You assumed that I was making an assumption. Don't do that. If you did this in public, you would be treated with disdain in any civilized company.

A group of people are talking, you overhear "Let's go to our favorite restaurant!"

You interject "It's not MY favorite restaurant, don't make assumptions."

The speaker looks at you with contempt. "I wasn't talking to you".

[–] Kushan@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

A thread about US politics on a worldwide facing thing called the internet. On a platform that is by design decentralised.

You cannot fathom that this isn't a restaurant, it's the internet and people on the internet are from all over the world.

Even now you're doubling and tripling down acting like I've interrupted some private discussion with your friends because the alternative makes you look incredibly silly.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

No "private conversation with my friends" was interrupted. A public conversation was interrupted rudely, to the benefit of absolutely no one.

You don't like my example, fine. Still, should you do this in public ANYWHERE on earth, you will be looked at with distaste.

I eagerly await you continuing to defend your lack of civility, because that's what impolite people do.

Nobody holding a conversation here (or anywhere) will ever accommodate you, you will always feel left out and ostracized. Not because of where you are from, but because of what you are.

I should have responded to your contribution with "no shit", and this is my mistake.

So, in closing, "People from other countries can't vote for a US president? No fucking shit."

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago

But not the kiddie fucking....

Jesus fucking christ, America.

[–] redlemace@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

You are all missing the point .... Reiner is drawing attention so Trump needs to make it about HIM again.

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago

"Funny" thing is, Netanyahu did the same on the same day about the shooting in Australia. Fucking fascist boomers.

But evangelicals are also a shame of our generation.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 weeks ago

Rats on a sinking ship. Fuck all of these people

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

If the concept of shame itself could have shame, that lecherously vile piece of human-shaped dogshit is an example of what shame’s shame would look like on a lecherously vile piece of human-shaped dogshit.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Not at all, the shame of our generation is the election of Trump. TWICE!! And the fact that the majority of Americans actually supported him, and he won the popular vote.
Trump,'s post is only what can be expected from a malignant narcissist with dementia that prevent the little bit of self control that could have prevented him from actually posting it.
Wake up Americans, the shame is not on Trump, it's on the American voters!

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Which generation? For that matter how is it anyone's shame but trump and all those evangelical leaders that support him.

[–] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

It's fine, ya'll can Lean on Me

[–] TheFinn@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 weeks ago

Grizzly? The grizzly murder?

Come on, FFS