shoutout to diolinux! dude is doing a lot of heavy lifting to help out new linux users over in brazil. and photogimp is quite useful everywhere.
Linux
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by AlpΓ‘r-Etele MΓ©der, licensed under CC BY 3.0
krita is another foss editor
Krita is an Illustrator replacement not a Photoshop replacement.
Nah, I use krita for everything Ive used photoshop for over the decades. It has a lot of the same exact filters and ui conventions etc of creative suite era photoshop.
It is my understanding that Kriita is a raster art program, while Illustrator is a vector art program. Inkscape is a vector art program.
While that is an important distinction. It still needs to be said that Krita is a drawing program like Inkscape and Illustrator not a photo editing program like GIMP or Photoshop.
Yeah, that's kind of a thing; the Adobe suite kind of doesn't have a raster drawing program, Photoshop gets used for that but Photoshop is meant to be a photo editor.
A "digital artist" or "digital painter" will want to use Krita, a "graphic artist" designing logos or signage is gonna want Inkscape, and people wanting to lie via photograph want GIMP.
As always every personβs workflow will be their own. Iβm honestly not sure what you are arguing.
Of the 2, I've come to prefer Krita. Acly replaces most of Photoshop's generative tools cleanly and improves upon them with features like pose vectors and live mode.
Krita is missing one feature that I rely on often - setting the white point in the levels tool.
Krita should letcha set the white point in the levels tool. But it won't letcha pick white with the eyedropper, which is a notable omission.
Yeah, that's the problem I have - it's something I end up doing on an awful lot of photos. I need that tool.
At it's heart, Krita is a drawing program with a few concessions to photo editing/manipulation. Whereas Gimp is a photo editing software with a few concessions to drawing.
Unless Krita decides to go the full adobe route and try to do both (which I doubt will ever happen), a feature like setting a white point (or any feature that isn't solely useful for photography but not drawing) will ever be in it.
People making the comparison as though Gimp and Krita are both trying to do the same thing are utterly exhausting.
Thank you. Works well. I'm much happier with the interface I used for over 30 years in Photoshop, it's helpful to have that emulated somewhat in GIMP.
I also tracked down how to set the scroll wheel to zoom without the need for the Ctrl key, which was another annoyance. I've tried before to discover this, but failed. Maybe I was looking at the official documentation, which could use some work. Anyway, here's how to get the scroll wheel to zoom without the Ctrl key:
To save anyone from having to watch a video:
Edit > Preferences > Input Devices > Input Controllers > Main Mouse Wheel
In this menu, double-click "Scroll Up", and select view-zoom-in-accel. Then do the same to "Scroll Down" with the value view-zoom-out-accel.
Just did that, thanksπ.
btw the comand x me was just : view-zoom-in view-zoom-out
Vanilla GIMP has superior UX compared to Photoshop imo
I agree. I transitioned to GIMP on my own hardware a couple of years ago but still have to use Photoshop once a week for work.
Panning and zooming - a massive part of graphics UX - is miles better in GIMP for example and makes PS look primitive by comparison.
As someone with no PS experience or other baggage weighing me down, I find the default UI to be insanely unintuitive. Im not even sure what the panels on the right or bottom are for, the left toolbar panel randomly disappears on me occasionally and I can never figure out how to get it back without closing and reopening GIMP. Things like Crop don't seem to do anything obvious. Painting with the brush doesn't work unless you first use the selection tool to draw a box around the area you want to use the brush. Etc, etc, etc. Some of this is obviously just because I'm a novice, and I manage to fumble my way through things, but at the same time it could be drastically simplified for simple tasks. It feels like a tool that was built for people who already knew how to use it.
I highly recommend you watch one of the free video courses, from the beginning, on youtube.
GIMP is a really sophisticated piece of software designed for maximum technical control and flexibility. If you can dedicate a few hours to learning it you can do basically anything, for free, forever. If you only need to do basic stuff it might be worth looking at something else like Tux Paint for example, which is faster to pick up. It also has sound effects and is great fun.
This is just wrong. I love foss and the effort put into gimp, but there are so many little ux things that it gets wrong.
The big one for me is non destructive resizing of pasted objects. Photoshop puts the little drag handles on them allowing for resizing, the top middle one allows you to rotate, holding the shift key locks proportions etc, all right away after pasting.
On gimp you can open a menu and specify the height and width, or you can click shift + s, which kind of works like Photoshops but is somehow clunkier & destructive when shrinking.
I also really miss smart objects and the universal tool options menu (not sure what it's called but it lives on the top of the canvas on PS and gives you all the relevant options for whatever tool you are using. I'm sure gimp has an equivalent but out of the box I find it much more correct and confusing.
Agreeable, but this patch is useful for people coming from photoshop, especially the shortcuts. The muscle memory is hard to fix π
The muscle memory is hard to fix
Also this is software, we should celebrate and embrace the fact that the same tool can be customized to look and be organized differently to maximally ease users into learning it. This is one of the super powers of software!
Preach. My key bindings followed me from Avid to FCP to Premiere. Still hittin H for RaHzor.
now that is one VERY controversial and brave opinion. I admire you for it.
Really? I don't think Photoshop is any better than GIMP. It's slow, complicated and adobe cloud.
if this improves how gimp handles fonts I'd use it.
I do not think it impacts that. Have you used GIMP3? Way better text handling.
it's not though. I just tried it and you can't highlight text and then scroll through fonts. you still need to know specifically what font you want or know all the fonts installed on your system. Unlike photoshop where you can highlight text and then scroll through the fonts you have installed which will change the highlighted text to whatever font on the fly. Gimp still to this day doesn't do that.
Not in the popup dialog, but in the text tool properties (on the left under the tools after you select the tool). You can scroll through the fonts there and your selected font will apply to the currently selected text.
My biggest pet peeve is having to scroll past 5000 versions of Noto font.
Any chance this could install through the Linux Mint Software Manager, for auto updates?
i have it through software manager and it updates fine (well i have my settings to update flatpaks on login)
Will mint not auto update flatpaks?


