this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2025
1197 points (99.7% liked)

pics

27172 readers
1348 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Article including the 100 plus other advertising signs that were “brandalised”.

all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 101 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I feel like the UK is waking up faster to the need to tax the oligarchs than most.

TaxWealthNotWork.

[–] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 35 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I hope they also wake up to how much reactionary propaganda affects their life and that e.g. trans people just want to live.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

by the way, i'm curious, what does "reactionary" even mean?

is it re-action in the sense of acting again? is it reaction in the sense of responding to somebody else's actions?

[–] just_an_average_joe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Reactionary in politics often means going "back to the good old days". Stuff like back in feudal/monarchy people used to have honor, courage, and respect. We didn't used to exploit nature. People were more happy etc. etc.

When in fact, LGBTQ rights were abysmal, rascism and slavery was the norm in "good old days".

We should criticize the current system and move further ahead not backwards

oh yeah that makes sense, thanks

[–] X@piefed.world 3 points 2 months ago

My understanding is that the term means an action that happens in response to a previous action: a stranger slaps you in the face, you will very likely have some kind of response to being publicly slapped; if you don’t do anything in response to being slapped, you had no reaction.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

taxing wealth instead of work is also an economically sound decision if you want to boost productivity and your economy's revenue.

As a general rule, when taxes on products are lower, that means these products cost less to the consumer, so consumers buy more of it [rule of supply and demand, also speaks about the connection between price and traded quantity]. So there's more revenue and more products sold, which boosts production.

[–] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

For sure and what always get deliberately left out of the productivity metric is that, wrapped up in those figures, we include how much money has to be paid out to lazy landlords and workshy shareholders in order to get an hours work from a British person.

Essentially, the financial obesity of the super wealthy is crushing everyone below them and stifling productivity, ruining the productivity metric.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Musk turned up at a Reform rally and everyone was cool with it. We'll see

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 10 points 2 months ago

~~Racists~~ Reform voters were ok with it.

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

That's hella selection bias though. I'm more concerned with how many people are Reform voters (even if the majority of them aren't so deep that they'd attend a Reform rally)

[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

If they really wanted a party that helps them they'd vote Green. Instead, they vote racist.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They're more popular than you think, and far far more organized than the totality of the left. No one's voting Conservative, Labour's circling the toilet, everyone's looking for other parties

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 months ago

Yeah its a little concerning seeing polls that show how popular they are. I hope its some kind of inaccurate/misleading polling but I really don't know. All I do know is my friends are clearly no way representative of the country or even the area I live in - almost all voted green.

[–] nogooduser@lemmy.world 46 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The first three questions are answered by the last one I think.

[–] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 36 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Because they were allowed to.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago

Maybe, but posters go up without permission too.

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 2 months ago

There's a term for the art movement of this, Subvertising, a compound of Subvert + Advertising

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago

But no it's the bloody immigrants arr

[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Because if there is a punishment, it's a small fine and nobody responsible goes to prison.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I remember reading somewhere that the Irish "low tax" area was deliberately accepted by the EU as a sort of reparation payments for the irish potato famine, which was largely caused by english politics.

but idk whether that's actually true or just a rumor.

[–] FundMECFS@anarchist.nexus 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The Irish aren’t getting that much tax revenue from the big corpos either tbh. Everyone loses here IMO

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 months ago

Yeah, My last company setup an office in Dublin as a tax haven. It gave them a hundred jobs, but they payed jack all in taxes while funneling hundreds of millions home.