People defending this decision or blaming the individual mod is wild. Gabe is famously libertarian and known to encourage moderation (or rather lack thereof) in line with his libertarian worldview on Steam. This is unfortunately very much on brand for the platform and Gabe himself.
this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2025
528 points (94.1% liked)
Bluesky
1784 readers
20 users here now
People skeeting stuff.
Bluesky Social is a microblogging social platform being developed in conjunction with the decentralized AT Protocol. Previously invite-only, the flagship Beta app went public in February 2024. All are welcome!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
There are differences between the political stances of Libertarianism and Islam. And while those two realms of religious/social beliefs are somewhat incompatible, outright hate speech is not generally acceptable on the platform.
In this particular case, the mod should be removed.
outright hate speech is not generally acceptable on the platform
This has been on Steam for almost 4 years. Valve doesn't give a fuck. https://store.steampowered.com/app/1853200/TYRONE_vs_COPS/
load more comments
(3 replies)
Could we get a link to the game?
Edit: https://store.steampowered.com/app/2451100/Little_Rocket_Lab/
Wishlisting a game, even if you don't plan to buy it, can increase visibility of a game in Steam.
You can also mark reviews as not helpful.
Looks like a cross between stardew and factorio so gona give it a try this weekend
You should be free to be rude online. It’s useful to know who the rude ones are so you can avoid them. Censoring is a bad idea in this case, and I believe Valve has taken the correct stance.
Expressing that a group of people shouldn't exist is way further than being rude.
load more comments
(1 replies)
looks like its just a mod drunk on a bit of power rather then Valve itself.
That may be the case but it is frustrating that companies can hide behind the bad actions of those working on their behalf or are an independent subsidiary that a normal person can't distinguish between.
Valve's stance can be determined by their action or inaction on this.
"They're not all white males so it's DEI"
These people are just as annoying as the people that cry about there not being enough diversity. Just don't think about the character's races or whatever.
Anyone gonna post the TOS or we all just gonna wave our dicks around in the comments
I think it's a perfectly valid review. It is stupid and racist, but that's clearly on the reviewer and not the developer.
With any rating system you'll always get someone leaving a negative rating without valid reason. At least with this one, anyone who reads it knows they can ignore it.
It's a valid review until some people start saying same thing for Christians and Jews and suddenly the policy will change to "minimize spreading hate".
I still agree that this falls under hate speech and should be removed for that reason.
I just don't think that there is any other reason for its removal, so Steam keeping there is at least consistent for now.
The only thing we cannot afford to tolerate is intolerance itself.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I used to work for a company that made blinds that people could order online and would then have to put up themselves and one person left a negative review because they dropped the set of blinds on their head while trying to install it.
The owner was delighted because it was such a stupid 1 star review. Anyone reading it would just laugh at the person leaving the review and wouldn't think negatively of the company.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(15 replies)
tbf it doesn't say "i don't like muslims"
https://steamcommunity.com/id/breakzoras/recommended/2451100/
I mean. The sentiment is kinda the same in this case. But yeah, do t use quotations if it isn't a quote.
I don't like Christians
I don't like anyone that wants to make laws based on their favorite fairytale.
load more comments
(5 replies)
Based dev and I wishlistrd that game because it looks fun and I want to support them for the response alone, but I think I kind of agree with that decision, or can at least see where it's coming from. Disliking a game for its political message seems entirely valid to me, if someone made an otherwise amazing game but the message is "hitler was great actually", I'd like to be able to negatively review that. And since it's not review bombing but actual individual idiots, it shouldn't have a big impact wrt to the ratio. If anything I read a review like that and become more interested in the game. Allowing it at least keeps them honest.
Though "it has muslims" as a negative review reason still seems like it should be removed just for being racist (or if i were to give the reviewer way more benefit of the doubt than they deserve, sounding racist. I guess in theory they could just not like religions in games, but let's be real they'd love if it were christians instead).
Problem is that "Hitler" is an individual while "Muslim" is multiple groups of people all with different views.
Also yeah it's usually used as synonym for "brown people."
load more comments
(2 replies)
Its a "valid," review in that it does describe how they dont like the game and why, and hinestpy thats better than 90% of reviews. However, and this is a big however, racists should not get a pass and should be banned and removed for being racist. We should not brook these type of people and especially not give them a platform. It only makes things worse. Stamp the problem out with prejudice.
Yeah, what's wrong with supporting the arbitary, unnearned hatred of ethnic groups?
Muslim isn't really an ethnic group though. It's a religion represented in every race.
It isn't a specific organization of any one particular faith though. It's a category. I don't know how many Muslim organized groups there are, but my guess is that they all don't agree on who they consider Muslim. If you want to say ''this particular organization is responsible for...'' that can be accurate and holding that specific group of people or individuals in that group accountable for their actions is valid. But to say 'this entire category of people I can blame or hold accountable of any and all of the people I consider Muslim's actions' that's prejudice and bigotry, or whatever you want to call hatred based on category.
load more comments
(1 replies)
It would be interesting to test with other groups of people. For example, when happens if all my review says is "I don't like jews" or "I don't like Americans/Russians/Chinese people".
load more comments
(9 replies)
view more: next ›