The fucking audacity to make money off of AI generated content at all is already baffling to me lmao
Music
↳ Our family Communities:
➰#Music
Music.world - !music@lemmy.world
Jazz -!jazz@lemmy.world
Album Art Porn - !albumartporn@lemmy.world
Fake Album Covers - !fakealbumcovers@lemm.ee
Obscure Music - !ObscureMusic@lemm.ee
Vinyl and LP's - !vinyl@lemmy.world
Electronic Dance Music - !edm@reddthat.com
60's Music - !60smusic@lemmy.world
70's Music - !70smusic@lemmy.world
80's Music - !80smusic@lemmy.world
90's Music - !90smusic@lemmy.world
The whole point of AI music is to turn Music from an art form into a product, from something that is unique and personal and has meaning to people to something that can be mass produced and consumed as a product.
How can Spotify/whoever "wrote" these claim royalties and deny them to gizz, who should have a writing credit for the clone's use of the original song, and still acknowledge that AI can hold no copyright
Does anyone have an internet archive link? The guardian website seems to be freaking out on me
Guardian is really battening the hatches, but firefox reader mode works for me. I'm all for putting their original investigative reporting behind the wall, but when it's basically a retelling of someone's social media post, I'm less understanding and think it's kind of shortsighted.
Great, it's doing real music with actual instruments now? Fuck me.