this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2025
1019 points (98.1% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

2444 readers
86 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc. This includes instance shaming.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wischi@programming.dev 2 points 16 hours ago

Wealthiest country on earth

🀣 It's like putting one leg in boiling hot water, the other one in liquid nitrogen and calling it room temperature.

The US is a third world country with some very rich people.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Responsible Americans blow their brains out at 75. How dare she.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I figure that if I get to my 80's or thereabouts, it will be time to end my life. I don't have the wealth, friendship, or health to enjoy my life at the age of deterioration. Hopefully, society will accept my choice, and offer a painless way to leave this coil.

That said, I would prefer this lady and all other people to have their twilight years to be enjoyable.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

80s is too damn long. My retirement plan, same one, will be around 70 if I make it that long. Just judging by how shit it feels to be in my 40s, and I'm in pretty decent shape.

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This happens BECAUSE it's the wealthiest country on earth.

We live in a time of larger wealth disparity than the times of peasants and kings.

The royals were also really wealthy as they said in ignorance "let them eat cake".

[–] deltapi@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Except that statement wasn't said by royalty, it's a misattributed mistranslation of a snippet from Jean-Jacques Rousseau's Confessions.
It was written 9 years before Marie Antoinette became queen and while she was still a child and had not yet traveled to France.
This is a classic case of the victors writing history. This quote has been used countless times to try to illustrate that the royalty was out of touch (which I'm neither arguing for nor against here,) however there's no evidence it was ever spoken by the Queen - indeed it wasn't attributed to her at all for many years after her death.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MiDaBa@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

Why are we so worried about this woman when nobody seems to be worried about the 93 year old billionaire shareholder who won't be able to manipulate global geopolitical events in their final few years? They should be allowed to extract every ounce of value from our society that they bought fair and square . If you don't like the way things are then go buy your own society. Sheesh.

I feel weird submitting this knowing that even extream sarcasm isn't as obvious as it should be here in 2025

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

What makes anyone believe she's capable of surviving eviction? Oh right, they don't care if she dies.

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago (3 children)

You can't be 'the richest country in the world" if 40% of your citizens are in poverty. The US "gov" is corrupt and greedy. This place truly is a shithole...

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 7 points 2 days ago

Sire you can , it's called inequality.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If I were in that position I would do the same. Either they can't evict me or I get sent to prison and I would be kept warm and fed, rather than the streets where I would probably starve or freeze to death.

[–] sobchak@programming.dev 6 points 2 days ago

They usually just release homeless people charged with petty crimes after the first hearing (24-48 hours) without bail. They can't pay fines, for commissary, phone calls, and all that; or work, so they're not profitable.

[–] Aeao@lemmy.world 214 points 3 days ago (27 children)

My grandad was told he’d have to give back his electric wheelchair due to some change in insurance.

He was like β€œlet me know what day, so I can have the news here as your tip a 100 year old ww2 veteran out of his wheelchair”

They let him keep the chair.

load more comments (27 replies)
[–] VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

Checked my mother's facebook and sure enough she's concerned about it. If there's one thing the elderly care about it's their social security checks. She still doesn't understand who is responsible though.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 53 points 2 days ago (8 children)

Every single assisted living facility in the United States would do the same thing. They are businesses designed to strip every last bit of wealth before we die, they do not give a shit about their ~~residents~~ customers.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Romanis@leminal.space 8 points 2 days ago

I'd like to say im surprised but im not the yanks really have lost the bloody plot

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago (3 children)

This is what republicans seem to want. Thinking THEY will never be in such a situation so they have nothing to worry about.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 19 hours ago

The funny thing is they keep thinking that well into their 70s living in trailer park. Led by a guy with one foot in the grave stealing billions ...for what?

[–] Zer0_F0x@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Y'all should change the dollar bill line from "in God we trust" to "Got mine, fuck you"

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 30 points 2 days ago (7 children)

The most disturbing part of this is, she made it to 93, and wasn't able to pay rent. Does America have no way to pay their retired and elderly people a living wage at the end of their life?

Like, she's not even just retired, she's elderly. The "Golden years" of wearing a diaper and needing a walker, kind of elderly.

Even if the charges were dropped and she was allowed to go home, the fact that it got to the point where she was hauled off to jail in an orange jumpsuit and cuffs should not have happened. Someone should have stopped and said, "are we really going to try to send a 93 year old to jail?" And that should have been where it stopped. Because that's not something you do to a 93 year old for missing a few rent payments.

America is cracked man. Should not have gotten there. What the actual fuck.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

Yup.

American here.

As far as I can tell we are totally fucked. As in, if I was smart, I'd be finding a way to get citizenship elsewhere before I get too old.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 103 points 3 days ago (2 children)

"refusing to leave"

Where, specifically, did they expect her to go? Being thrown out on the streets at 93 is effectively a death sentence.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 46 points 2 days ago (11 children)

not being able to work is a death sentence in America

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 29 points 2 days ago (1 children)

guess the freedom in america is the "works makes you free" variety

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] _Nico198X_@europe.pub 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zemo@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (8 children)

I dont understand why you handcuff people who clearly are not a danger to anyone.

[–] LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

Because acab

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (8 children)

Trigger Warning: Now before anybody comments that I'm evil for this, I'm not saying I would do it, or that I condone it but that I would understand why someone would, and could totally see it becoming an issue. Especially with copycats and such.

That being said I could totally see people getting to the point of hopelessness and going out by suicide by cop, either directly going after police, or whatever mega-corp, or landlord or whatever they perceive to put them in that position. Obviously a 93 year old woman likely doesn't have the strength to pull a trigger but as this inequality issue continues to rise and more and more people are losing hope due to issues outside their control dangerous and scary things are likely to happen. Just like we never solved bullying and it led to school shootings, if we don't solve inequality, I'm afraid that mass shootings are going to go up.

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What you're describing is basically how active shooters are born, including school shooters. And this is also why there are more active shooters in the US than in the next 50+ countries combined.

Inequality leads to crime. A system that exploits citizens at every step leads to active shooters. These phenomena are so well known and documented, it's physically impossible for the current and previous 10 American governments not to be and have been aware of the issue. They must have simply deemed it an acceptable cost.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] telllos@lemmy.world 40 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's funny how the person commenting is still saying unable to work as an argument. In what word a 93 able to work should be expected to... work?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 days ago

So you mean they will house her only in a more expensive and more dehumanizing way.

[–] biotin7@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 days ago

Being Heartless is the de-facto standard in capitalism.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 91 points 3 days ago (17 children)

State spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to chase a nonagenarian out of her home over a four figure rent check.

All so some landlord can afford another wing on the McMansion

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] thorhop@sopuli.xyz 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But being poor is a crime! She could have invested in crypto and gotten rich off of dumping it, but noooooo!

She had to "RrTiRe" and "EnJoY hEr wInTeR YeArS". Lazy layabout. She'll learn the value of HARDWORK once she's making license plates, and maybe then she can pull herself up by her bootstraps by investing those $2 a day and earning her keep in about- oh, say a 100 years?

People live to be 200, right? I don't know, I'm not good with numbers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

"heartless animals"

This is basically how I view the United States at this point.

I am American.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί