Reminds me of this story. Some guy went into a Macdonalds in Paris, which for some reason had security guards, and they evidently tried to forcibly remove his G-glasses, which were surgically attached to his head. I believe there was a rumor that the place was mobbed up.
this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2025
253 points (95.0% liked)
United States | News & Politics
3527 readers
461 users here now
Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.
If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.
Rules
Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.
No memes/pics of text
Post news related to the United States.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Oh no, god forbid someone records her in the most recorded state on earth.
Yeah I understand hating the Meta glasses, but what, are we going to destroy every camera we find in the wild? This is a small piece of a larger problem and I'm just not sure assaulting a stranger on the subway is the way to go about it.
are we going to destroy every camera we find in the wild?
Yes.
Yeah my first thought was "you know what? Now that you mention it, I'd be more than happy with that. I didn't even think of it as an option but yeah, sure, let's give it a go"
I'm all for this but we should start with all of the cameras owned by businesses and the government. If anyone at all should be allowed to record in public it is we the people.
I think there's even an achievement for doing that.
load more comments
(14 replies)
are we going to destroy every camera we find in the wild
If it is from a mega corp that is known for spying on people: absolutely
They have no right for cameras in public.
They have no right for cameras in public.
I'm pretty sure they do. That comes along with the word "public". This sounds like ICE telling observers to stop filming.
Collecting the footage from thousands of cameras and turning it into a giant surveillance system to track everyone is a different matter, and that's what needs to be made illegal.
They're the same picture
When Google Glass was a thing people with assistive vision technologies were being attacked too.
I find it interesting that we only know of this because someone recorded the guy.
He recorded himself after the incident.
The video in the story is being filmed by a third party. But honestly I give the whole story a 52% chance of being completely staged.
are we going to destroy every camera we find in the wild?
Yes
Every little bit helps! If we all pitch in, many hands make light work!
load more comments
(1 replies)
Is that an option? If so, yes
How many flock cameras and ring cameras did she pass that day lol (has NYC banned them?)
Are you for real? Or just a Meta bot? Can't you see the difference between a camera in a phone, that is more or less obvious when pointed to film a person, and a camera mounted in glasses? For real?
Or are you suggesting that if we have let phones with cameras be, we should tolerate another escalation in the fight against privacy?
Please let me know which is it?! Im really curious.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
“I was making a funny noise people were honestly crying laughing at,” he claimed in the caption of a followup video. “She was the only person annoyed.
Dude tried turning a commuter train into a content factory. Fuck that. Hire participants. Pay people.
We’ve all met that kid in first grade.
It was not a funny noise, I’m sure of it.
load more comments
(2 replies)
🪬 🥇
Some cashier at McDonalds will probably rat her out Luigi-style.
Not sure what you’re talking about; Luigi and I were playing cards that day. He was physically with me the entire time.
load more comments
(1 replies)
A seeming eternity later, Meta has attempted to revive the idea with its Ray-Ban Meta glasses. While it’s arguably a significant technological leap over Google’s early forays
Duh, Google Glass was 2013. A brand new one that Meta pumped an obscene amount of money into had better be much improved to aid the government's warrantless surveillance programs on Americans
Which is what it is, just another platform for intelligence gathering that Meta sells to the government
...and not only are morons voluntarily wearing them, they're paying for the privilege to do so
She is a hero
Lol.
Shut up nerd
like the google glass was used for porn as soon as it was released, and then shortly google stopped making them.
To be fair,some of the earliest examples we have in all media is "porn".
the entire internets life cycle has always been:
- new tech
- new porn delivery option
- widespread use of new tech
- profit
- repeat
I even let her sit down when she got on the train at 42nd street, and I continued to stand.
Oh wow, everyone look at this chivalrous hero - he was standing when she got on the subway, and graciously “let” a random woman sit. It’s not like he gave up a seat for her, but he still thinks that by “continuing to stand” he somehow did something special that she should be grateful to him for.
I know seats can be a rare opportunity on the NYC subway, especially around 42nd St. But to think that by standing you’re somehow entitled to more respect than anyone else is absurd.
Funny how she was standing in the video he posted though. In a really pretty relaxed position too so it doesn't look like she just got up.
Meta tells the people that buy these glasses that they "only record audio and video when you tell them to" but that turned out to be an absolute lie. It's always looking, always listening, and people shouldn't use these fuckin corpo people trackers and advertisement machines.
Yes, it's only acceptable for the state to monitor people in public.
I’ve always wanted a pair of glasses with a cool hud, that tells me the time and weather and shows me what song im playing or a text i got. Is that so evil?
load more comments
(5 replies)
Remember the “old” saying that if the product is free, you’re the product? This is the end stage of that where unwilling and unknowing participants are now the product.
Also, anyone remember gargoyles from Snow Crash?
load more comments
(1 replies)
view more: next ›