Yeah I understand hating the Meta glasses, but what, are we going to destroy every camera we find in the wild? This is a small piece of a larger problem and I'm just not sure assaulting a stranger on the subway is the way to go about it.
this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2025
256 points (95.1% liked)
United States | News & Politics
3584 readers
272 users here now
Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.
If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.
Rules
Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.
No memes/pics of text
Post news related to the United States.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
are we going to destroy every camera we find in the wild?
Yes.
Yeah my first thought was "you know what? Now that you mention it, I'd be more than happy with that. I didn't even think of it as an option but yeah, sure, let's give it a go"
I'm all for this but we should start with all of the cameras owned by businesses and the government. If anyone at all should be allowed to record in public it is we the people.
I think there's even an achievement for doing that.
Start with your phone then.
If I could get a phone without one I would.
I don't recall ever having used the damn thing, all it does is stick out like a wart making the phone unsightly and unnecessarily thick.
And the other, even more useless one is just poking an extremely irritating hole on the screen.
They're probably scratched beyond any usability anyway, since for some reason cases and screen protectors refuse to cover them.
load more comments
(5 replies)
Being stuck inside a system does not make one a hypocrite to criticize it from within the system. Nor would one act of self immolation achieve anything but dying pointlessly in a fire. The prison guards will merely shovel your remains into a bucket. People like you will continue to goad other miserable prisoners into more pointless acts of self destruction for short term personal gratification.
We're so deep into the technological surveillance state that people like you can't even see that there was once a world outside these prison walls. You've accepted your fate. Maybe you we're born into it. Maybe it's been so long that you've forgotten it's not normal to have all this forced upon us. In this world where surveillance state technology is required, smartphones are now integrated into critical needs of daily life. From government to financial institutions to workplace. You cannot live without it short of going inawoods Ted K style. At which point the prison guards are likely to descend upon your log cabin with the full military force of the state and corporate apparatus.
Ultimately these acts of immolation achieve nothing against the system itself but demonstrate the futility that we're all stuck inside a prison. Seems like you thought you had a really clever retort there. You don't. It's you who are the fool.
load more comments
(2 replies)
are we going to destroy every camera we find in the wild
If it is from a mega corp that is known for spying on people: absolutely
They have no right for cameras in public.
They have no right for cameras in public.
I'm pretty sure they do. That comes along with the word "public". This sounds like ICE telling observers to stop filming.
Collecting the footage from thousands of cameras and turning it into a giant surveillance system to track everyone is a different matter, and that's what needs to be made illegal.
When Google Glass was a thing people with assistive vision technologies were being attacked too.
I find it interesting that we only know of this because someone recorded the guy.
He recorded himself after the incident.
The video in the story is being filmed by a third party. But honestly I give the whole story a 52% chance of being completely staged.
are we going to destroy every camera we find in the wild?
Yes
Every little bit helps! If we all pitch in, many hands make light work!
load more comments
(1 replies)
If we normalize assaulting people that want to walk around with cameras on their face being creepy then less people will walk around doing that. Sometimes the solution is as simple as some minor violence.
How many flock cameras and ring cameras did she pass that day lol (has NYC banned them?)
Are you for real? Or just a Meta bot? Can't you see the difference between a camera in a phone, that is more or less obvious when pointed to film a person, and a camera mounted in glasses? For real?
Or are you suggesting that if we have let phones with cameras be, we should tolerate another escalation in the fight against privacy?
Please let me know which is it?! Im really curious.
load more comments
(2 replies)
“I was making a funny noise people were honestly crying laughing at,” he claimed in the caption of a followup video. “She was the only person annoyed.
Dude tried turning a commuter train into a content factory. Fuck that. Hire participants. Pay people.
We’ve all met that kid in first grade.
It was not a funny noise, I’m sure of it.
load more comments
(2 replies)
🪬 🥇
Some cashier at McDonalds will probably rat her out Luigi-style.
Not sure what you’re talking about; Luigi and I were playing cards that day. He was physically with me the entire time.
load more comments
(1 replies)
A seeming eternity later, Meta has attempted to revive the idea with its Ray-Ban Meta glasses. While it’s arguably a significant technological leap over Google’s early forays
Duh, Google Glass was 2013. A brand new one that Meta pumped an obscene amount of money into had better be much improved to aid the government's warrantless surveillance programs on Americans
Which is what it is, just another platform for intelligence gathering that Meta sells to the government
...and not only are morons voluntarily wearing them, they're paying for the privilege to do so
like the google glass was used for porn as soon as it was released, and then shortly google stopped making them.
To be fair,some of the earliest examples we have in all media is "porn".
the entire internets life cycle has always been:
- new tech
- new porn delivery option
- widespread use of new tech
- profit
- repeat
Meta tells the people that buy these glasses that they "only record audio and video when you tell them to" but that turned out to be an absolute lie. It's always looking, always listening, and people shouldn't use these fuckin corpo people trackers and advertisement machines.
load more comments
(4 replies)
I even let her sit down when she got on the train at 42nd street, and I continued to stand.
Oh wow, everyone look at this chivalrous hero - he was standing when she got on the subway, and graciously “let” a random woman sit. It’s not like he gave up a seat for her, but he still thinks that by “continuing to stand” he somehow did something special that she should be grateful to him for.
I know seats can be a rare opportunity on the NYC subway, especially around 42nd St. But to think that by standing you’re somehow entitled to more respect than anyone else is absurd.
Funny how she was standing in the video he posted though. In a really pretty relaxed position too so it doesn't look like she just got up.
I’ve always wanted a pair of glasses with a cool hud, that tells me the time and weather and shows me what song im playing or a text i got. Is that so evil?
Legit the only use case I'd have for glasses with a HUD is if it could give me closed captions in real time. I'd be sold.
Full agreement. Honestly it's not even that I really hate the glasses (though I do), but my bigger issue is making content of strangers with neither consent nor good reason. You should fear your camera will get broken for that.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Remember the “old” saying that if the product is free, you’re the product? This is the end stage of that where unwilling and unknowing participants are now the product.
Also, anyone remember gargoyles from Snow Crash?
load more comments
(1 replies)
view more: next ›