this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2025
233 points (98.3% liked)

Fuck Cars

13900 readers
410 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 66 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In their suit, bike lane opponents, who include popular Astoria businesses like Parisi Bakery, Sotto la Luna and King Souvlaki, argued that the project would "jeopardize" the safety of cyclists and "increase the likelihood of injuries" to pedestrians — despite city data and mounds of research showing protected bike lanes do the exact opposite.

Said opponents need to be barred from further speaking on the topic. Lying should lose you credibility. Being full-ass wrong should as well.

Fuck cars. I just wanna ride a bike and not worry about dying.

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I mean, if the picture in the thumbnail is the bike lane... They might have a point. I wouldn't ride in that.

I blame the judge though for a dumb decision - the street should instead just be remade so the lane is on the side rather than in the middle of cars.

[–] hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

the bike lane is on the left. there are cars illegally parked in it. The narrow strip is not the bike lane, its the door zone, a 3 ft setback between the parked cars and the bike lane.

The street redesign doesn't even reduce car capacity. It still has two lanes for cars, and parking on either side, it gets the space by not having unnecessarily wide lanes.

[–] Mannivu@feddit.it 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

In the article there's the actual and the proposed structure of the road (https://lede-admin.nyc.streetsblog.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/48/2025/04/31st-St-diagram.png). What you see above is a buffer zone that divides parked cars (right) from the actual bike lane (left, even though there are cars parked).

[–] helvetpuli@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

Review brigade time?

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 75 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Why the fuck does a judge get to say what the city does. Defi the order hell Trump does.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Anyone can file suit. A judge needs to pass judgement. Hopefully the judge based it on something more legitimate than whining.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 1 points 1 day ago

The will quickly find someone responsible and put them in jail. Democrats would say there's no way to enforce it. Republicans don't fuck around.

[–] watson@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Is that what you really want? More people acting like Donald Trump?

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago (2 children)

No want to fight against fascism

[–] MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

Trump ignores the wants of the many to benefit the few. When the many stand up to the few, it's not the same as what Trump does, it's the opposite.

[–] Steve@communick.news 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Morally you're right of course. Everyone should follow laws and procedures. Even when others don't. No disagreement.

But there is a line from the first Foundation book. I'll paraphrase: Don't let your sense of morality stop you from doing the right thing.

When you're playing against a cheater. You'll follow the rules every time, and loose every time. Which is fine in a game. Especially when you know someone is inforcing the rules and the cheater will be stopped. But when when actual lives are on the line? And the ref is the one cheating? Going against your moral code to do the right thing, becomes the moral thing to do.

That's what RobbinHood was all about.

[–] crunchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 day ago

I want everyone to stop tripping over themselves to comply with dumb "orders" like this. If that means taking a page out of Trump's playbook and ignoring them, then yeah, fuck it.

rip up the bike lane and turn it into a sidewalk then rip up the street and turn it into a streetcar and bike lane.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The word 'unprecedented' will be part of daily vernacular until...

[–] drdalek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago

At certain point, everything is just precedented.

[–] zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 day ago

I'm so fucking sick of it

[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago

"DOT shall take all steps reasonably necessary to restore 31st Street between 31st Avenue and Newtown Avenue ... to substantially the same traffic markings, land configuration, and parking and loading regulations that existed immediately prior to commencement of work on the Safety Project in August 2025,"

Why August 2025? Why not August 1925 or 1725?

[–] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If that thumbnail pic is accurate, i dont even see a bike lane.... i see two paint lines too close together. Looks super unsafe. I wouldnt even ride in that "bike lane". I'd prefer to just ride in city traffic like of one of those insane bike couriers

Imagine the ruling was actually: "judge orders bike lane removed.... and replaced with an actual separated bike lane...."

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The thumbnail picture is accurate it's just that there's cars illegally parked in the bike lane. The bike Lane is on the far left.

[–] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

Thank god the legal system is protecting those lawbreaking drivers against those evil bicyclists!

[–] NotSteve_@piefed.ca 10 points 1 day ago

Doug Ford moment 🥲