228
submitted 11 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/technology@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 152 points 11 months ago

Fortunately, this is easily avoided by not using Chrome.

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 65 points 11 months ago

Common Firefox W

[-] RooPappy@kbin.social 39 points 11 months ago

It would be best to make the switch today. That has the dual benefit of a) Showing Google that they will lose users, and maybe they will change their mind (again), and b) Show every website that they do need to put actual effort into supporting and testing against Firefox.

[-] ftbd@feddit.de 4 points 11 months ago

Best? Better than not using chrome in the first place?

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 86 points 11 months ago

Good. Firefox is the answer.

[-] Senex@reddthat.com 30 points 11 months ago

For me, the future is Firefox and Linux.

[-] 1984@lemmy.today -1 points 11 months ago

Yeah but putting all our hopes into Firefox is quite dangerous. All Google needs to do to fuck us over is to stop funding Firefox.

[-] Tygr@lemmy.world 76 points 11 months ago

Recently made the switch from Edge to Firefox to fully ditch Chromium. The more I read, the more I realize it was a great decision.

[-] 0x2d@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 months ago

why were you using microsoft edge?

[-] Tygr@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I liked it. Found it better than Chrome for my needs to finally get away from Google. I hadn’t realized I went from Chrome to Chromium. Within a year, I am now switched to Firefox. After theming it and stuff, I’m now liking it way more than everything else. It does everything I need and looks beautiful.

I also enjoy Firefox Focus on iOS which is basically incognito on steroids. Any time I click a link, it defaults to FFF.

[-] iFarmGolems@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

It's better than chrome. Smaller memory footprint and a bit faster. Source: I'm web dev.

[-] rob299@lemmy.world 40 points 11 months ago

In other words, these older extentions work just fine, no one wants the new limited features, and google is force disabling older extentions despite any outcries from its users because it can.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 36 points 11 months ago

🎶No they won't because I don't use chrome 🎶

[-] kambusha@feddit.ch 21 points 11 months ago

The popular uBlock Origin extension, for example, would be limited under Manifest V3. The developer created uBlock Origin Lite, a reduced version that is compatible with Manifest V3.

[-] Frellwit@lemmy.world 56 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

uBO Lite have a lot of limitations:

[-] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Sounds like manifest 3 would also break extensions like Stylish, Greasemonkey and Dark Reader, basically anything that injects or interacts with the html, css or JavaScript of a page in any way.

[-] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 11 months ago

Basically, most actually useful extensions

[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 11 months ago

Hilarious. Please people, just stop using Chrome seriously. There's no reason to do it.

[-] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 11 months ago

Well, googie has certainly given me ample reason to never use Chrome again... Not that I ever planned to anyway, but still...

[-] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 20 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Running winget install firefox should fix that problem for windows users

EDIT: Fuck off autocorrect

[-] slowroll@r.nf 5 points 11 months ago
[-] satans_crackpipe@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

My what extensions? Isn't that the keylogger and network compute software with perfunctory ad delivery features?

[-] SapphironZA@lemmings.world 4 points 11 months ago

I made the switch to waterfox (Firefox fork) that strips out much of the problematic mozilla stuff.

I started to switch because of the tab containers, as I work across a dozen or so accounts in our MSP business.

Now I realised how good Firefox can be if you get rid of the bloat.

[-] glimse@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago

Firefox is great regardless of "the bloat"

[-] SapphironZA@lemmings.world 3 points 11 months ago

I would say it's good, but could be great with small adjustments in the way it is packaged.

[-] ripcord@kbin.social 19 points 11 months ago

I've never once used Firefox and thought "man, is there bloat here". Whatwas bugging you?

[-] SapphironZA@lemmings.world 5 points 11 months ago

I was mainly referring to how sluggish it was. For my web apps, it was always slower and the UI would bog down. Maybe not the correct definition of you refer to unnecessary features.

I am more referring to how lean or streamline the software is. Both in front end design and backend.

A lot of browser performance has to do with how you use it, so my experience is not universal.

Still, even full fat Firefox is skinny compared to the morbidly obese Chrome and edge browsers.

[-] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 11 months ago

So weird to me how when Chrome first came out, it was the opposite: Firefox was getting sluggish and poorly optimized with too much going on, and Chrome was sleek and fast and seemed to just have what was needed to work.

[-] SapphironZA@lemmings.world 2 points 11 months ago

These things go in cycles. But I think the writing is on the wall. Google will never make the investment to unbloat Chrome.

[-] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 11 months ago

They have no incentive to, at least not as long as they're the dominant web browser

[-] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

There isn't much, Waterfox removes Pocket and disables most of the telemetry, tweaks some of the settings to be more privacy and performance minded, swaps google from default search engine and iirc it has more aggressive compiler optimization settings in exchange for having slightly more modern hardware requirements. And the default theme is more compact and less chrome-esque.

It originally was just about providing 64-bit builds of Firefox back when Mozilla didn't yet, today it's mostly "Firefox, but slightly better."

[-] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 11 months ago

Around the time Chrome first hit the scene, Firefox was getting pretty bloated and inefficient... They've come a long way since then but they still do a bunch of unnecessary stuff that should probably be off by default but isn't

[-] ripcord@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago

Like what should be off by default

[-] 0x2d@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 months ago

How will vivaldi and ungoogled-chromium be affected by these changes

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
228 points (94.9% liked)

Technology

59081 readers
3484 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS