this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2025
-3 points (42.1% liked)

Technology

4733 readers
991 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Blisterexe@lemmy.zip 6 points 18 hours ago

Despite protests, whining, and even a few tears, I managed to convince my son that just as we must respect other children’s “toys” at school, we also must respect the “rights” of IP owners by not taking or using what belongs to others. Fortunately, Google’s platform includes a filter that prevents generating content involving well-known characters or protected IP. And, with that safeguard in place, we were able to return to story time, and all sleep a little better that night.

This paragraph made me irrationally angry, like, what the fuck.

Genuinely at a loss for words.

[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 3 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

This is the first AI story where I actually side with the AI

[–] henchmannumber3@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So a bad parent tells the story of how his child was innocently engaging his creativity with a tool his father provided and then the father taught the child in a potentially traumatizing way that there's wrongthink possible when some wealthy people have decided they need to collect rent from everyone for engaging with culture. And dad blames the tool rather than the IP laws he supports that actually created the problem he now punished his child for unwittingly encountering with natural human behaviors such as curiosity and imagination.

And dad writes about it like he wants a cookie from the other IP profiteers since he was willing to throw his son under the bus to make a bad and misdirected point.

Good bedtime story. And the dragon slept happily on his hoard of IP forever knowing that the guards would stop even their own children from trying to "steal" it. The end.

[–] okwhateverdude@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Instead of AI article summaries, I just want to read your summaries.

[–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 2 points 13 hours ago

How do we know he's not AI.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 day ago

Why are we giving exposure to someone whose job it is to enforce restrictive copyright laws and who uses the term "intellectual property"?