this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2025
50 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

743 readers
411 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Got an article from BigStink that made me roll my eyes. Wanted to share the amusement. Not much new, or of substance lol

Over the past few months, we’ve seen a surge of skepticism around the phenomenon currently referred to as the “AI boom.” 

Yes, whom amongst us hasn't been a little concerned about the global economy tanking as of late?

These same voices overuse the phrase “AI slop” to disparage the remarkable images, documents, videos, and code that AI models produce at the touch of a button.

I do call it that smug-explain

By any objective measure, AI continues to improve at a stunning pace. The impressive leap in capabilities made by Gemini 3 in November is just the latest example. No, AI scaling has not hit the wall. In fact, I can’t think of another technology that has advanced this quickly at any point during my lifetime, and I started programming in 1982.

So why has the public latched onto the narrative that AI is stalling, that the output is slop, and that the AI boom is just another tech bubble that lacks justifiable use-cases?

Oh boy, please tell us.

I believe it’s because society is collectively entering the first stage of grief — denial — over the very scary possibility that we humans may soon lose cognitive supremacy to artificial systems.

There is no politics. There is no economy. There is no power. Its all psychology.

Sorry, I just have a big pet peeve when people "scale up" individual psychology to try to explain what's sociological or political.

Eighty-two years ago, philosopher [sic] Ayn Rand wrote these three simple sentences: “Man cannot survive except through his mind. He comes on earth unarmed. His brain is his only weapon.”

And Ayn Rand had the biggest brain of them all.

Why is a grown man, in the year of our lord 2025, unironically quoting Ayn Rand? Embarrassing.

Anyway, materialism is now in shambles lol. Its the mind that moves history, not the hands or the feet or the coordinated social labor of millions upon millions of workers.

No.

Its "smart" people with big brains, like Ayn Rand or this doofus, who makes the BigThink thoughts that move the world.

For me, these words summarize our self-image as humans — we are the superintelligent species.

And the CEO of Unanimous AI is the most superintelligentiest of us all. That's why he's telling you to keep calm and slop on.

This is the basis of our success and survival. And yet, we could soon find ourselves intellectually outmatched by widely available AI models that can outthink us on all fronts, solving problems infinitely faster, more accurately, and yes, more creatively than any human could.

I already (lovingly) made fun of STEM folks before, but Jesus H.

Now folks, are you ready for some man made horrors?

AI systems will soon be able to “read you” more accurately than any person could. They will do this by identifying micro-expressions on your face, in your voice, in your posture, in your gaze, and even in your breathing. This will enable AI assistants to infer your inner feelings faster and more precisely than is humanly possible... [and] will be able to observe your emotional reactions throughout your day and build predictive models of your behavior.

Like it or not, we will soon live in a world where many of the faces we encounter will be generative masks worn by AI agents. And yet, we tell ourselves that AI is just another tech boom. This is wishful thinking

Alright... not making me feel any better about the AI bubble, which you didnt argue against, and now I'm just worried about an AI police state on top of that.

What was the point of this article again?

In other words, we are not watching a bubble expand with blustery vapors. We are watching a planet form from churning magma, and it will solidify into a new framework for society. Denial will only make us unprepared. This is not an AI bubble. This is real.

Poetry

So after reading this I feel nothing. The AI CEO man is telling me that I'm the one that doesn't get it, man. That it's not slop, its actually the most creative thing in human existence. And what else? Um, we'll all be living in a Black Mirror episode? AI will soon manipulate space and time? There's no escape from the prison?

Oh, and it's not "just a bubble". Deep.

Well, I think we all agree that AI will still be around after the crash, and it will continue to make changes to the world even afterwards.

It's no surprise Dr. Computer CEO wants to minimize the AI bubble buzz and emphasize the staying power of AI and how great of an investment it is.

But I thought it was amusing the way he went about it by mentioning Ayn Rand and telling us that we are all too narrow minded and instead of thinking about "the economy" (pff) we should instead be more worried about the dystopia he's helping to create.

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 week ago (3 children)

AI systems will soon be able to “read you” more accurately than any person could. They will do this by identifying micro-expressions on your face, in your voice, in your posture, in your gaze, and even in your breathing. This will enable AI assistants to infer your inner feelings faster and more precisely than is humanly possible… [and] will be able to observe your emotional reactions throughout your day and build predictive models of your behavior.

Pure pseudo-science

[–] KuroXppi@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago

An AI trained entirely on Lie To Me and CIA masterclass videos

[–] mayakovsky@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They just want phrenology back

[–] anotherspinelessdem@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

👨‍🚀🔫👨‍🚀

[–] Sebrof@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago

They're trying so hard

[–] Nacarbac@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Someone bought him an espresso machine and the complete box set of Person of Interest.

[–] anotherspinelessdem@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Okay but unironically both of those are great

[–] Nacarbac@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh absolutely, though I hadn't known at the time that Jim Caviezel was a danger to all life. Makes almost a comedy when you know that the crew and writers are desperately trying to keep him under control on set.

[–] anotherspinelessdem@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

Oh he's crazy as hell but also thankfully only convincing as an actor and not as a person. Relatively far down the list of dangers to society.

[–] FnordPrefect@hexbear.net 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

widely available AI models that can outthink us

nope

~~widely available~~ AI models that can ~~out~~think ~~us~~

Still nope

This is not an AI bubble. This is real.

columbo Sorry, but that speech pattern just failed you your Voigt-Kampf test

[–] Horse@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 1 week ago

tbf, llms are way better than me at determining what word is statistically most likely to follow the previous word based on it's training data

[–] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 17 points 1 week ago

i definitely can see this person losing cognitive supremacy to the LLM that helped his wife file for divorce.

[–] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And yet, we could soon find ourselves intellectually outmatched by widely available AI models that can outthink us on all fronts...

First, we'd have to have AI models that can think at all.

And we don't. At all.

And no amount of blather from compromised CEOs or philosophically ignorant STEMbros is going to change that simple fact.

[–] Sebrof@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago

AI cant think and its still smarter than the guy who wrote this stinkpiece

[–] KuroXppi@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

this-will-have-consequences the LLM bubble is grossly inflated with false promises of replacing human labour, and has already resulted in mass layoffs and enmiseration, not to mention boosting the capability of the surveillance state and consuming more power than many large cities, exacerbating local and global climate strife, when it pops the most disadvantaged and marginalised will once again bear the brunt of the economic downturn while tech companies cannibalise one another to form larger monopolies

no-it-wont no it won't

[–] RedSturgeon@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago

How would AI be able to read my facial expressions if I can become aware of what it's detecting and just act counter to it?

It's the same as that "Lie detector" crap. That machine doesn't detect lies. It just detects patterns people have convince themselves indicate lying. You can easily counter them if you're aware of that, with some practice and de-programming.

When will these people learn that there is no determined path to uncover, there is no master race to create, there never was one and never will be. That they choose so desperately to cling onto their version of reality, simply makes it seem true to them.

"But these models can't even think!!", I reassure myself as my job that never actually required much thought to begin with is automated away by some shitty AI agent deemed "good enough" by management.

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

These AI grifters are not only always Objectivist Libertarian types, but they are also always talking about what AI could do in the future, they literally can't even pretend that their totally fine and totally not economic bubble actually provides a useful service to anyone today, it's literally always "imagine a hypothetical where it could do some amazing thing, see? It's valuable because I imagined it being valuable."

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago

Meet potential tech.

007:

  • 0 improvements to the world
  • 0 problems solved
  • 7 unemployed people per installation

Give me liberty Give me fire Let me steal jobs Or I’ll retire!

[–] segfault11@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

show me 1 AI picture that looks better than this:

[–] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago

AI is just Tech NAFTA

[–] Elysia@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I believe it’s because society is collectively entering the first stage of grief — denial — over the very scary possibility that we humans may soon lose cognitive supremacy to artificial systems.

I know ChatGPT wrote this slop for him, but I somehow doubt you'd be writing shit like this if you actually thought all of humanity was about to enter a stage of collective anger at you and your colleagues in particular next lol

[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

These same voices overuse the phrase “AI slop” to disparage the remarkable images, documents, videos, and code that AI models produce at the touch of a button.

Yeah remarkably shit, spits

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago

The only reason anyone pretends to like AI images is because AI is the banana taped to the wall for CHUDs.

They’re pretentious fart-sniffers. They just want to feel smart for liking something the rubes don’t so they can lecture them on how they “just don’t get it!”

[–] JustSo@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago

Excellent critique.

What a goober.