this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2025
214 points (100.0% liked)

News

37153 readers
1601 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In a scene reminiscent of the film “Groundhog Day,” the U.S. Navy has canceled the Constellation-class frigate program, with only the first two ships, which are already under construction, scheduled for completion.

The program was terminated due to production delays, escalating costs, and design challenges stemming from adapting a foreign design to meet U.S. requirements. The funds from the canceled frigates will be reallocated to other ships that can be produced more quickly.

The Constellation-class frigate program was intended to be a “low-risk” approach, basically a slam-dunk to building a new frigate, but it underwent significant changes to its Italian FREMM-based design, making it heavier, more expensive, and less aligned with its original blueprints.

all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 45 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Reminds me of those littoral combat ships that were built in Alabama and were garbage quality — loads of problems and can’t even defend themselves. Navy tried to stop spending on them but Congressman Bradley Byrne from Alabama keeps forcing it in to the budget.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Yep, eerily similar. It's not even clear what these ships are supposed to do well.

[–] pentastarm@piefed.ca 41 points 4 months ago

Nah, Kegseth just needed more booze money.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 4 months ago

I'm pretty sure that's just the inevitable consequence of decades of under-regulated capitalism and cronyism letting the arms dealers set their own prices and conditions.

Personally, I consider the most bloated military in the history of the world not being able to expand or even replace its flotilla a huge win though, regardless of the reasons 🤷

[–] commander@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago

Let's see if the coast guard is happy with the new patrol ship once one of those are finished. If the coast guard fails too, pretty entertaining incompetence

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 15 points 4 months ago (3 children)

This is such an incredibly dumb decision. This was going to be the direction the navy went in - more vessels that are capable in aggregate, but no single one as too big of a target. Datalink handoff. Sensor fusion.

But they’re probably gonna make a new class of battleship or something idiotically obsolete like that.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Sure, you know everyone's favorite ship, the aircraft carrier, well wait till you meet the drone carrier! It's just as big for some reason, but it mostly carries drones and guided missiles and it probably sails alongside a traditional carrier, because it can't actually perform all of the same duties. This is how we'll be able to spend more than ever before.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

They'll start down that path, spend billions on starting up the program, then a new president comes in and cancels that to return to the smaller ship philosophy and spends billions to start down that path again.

[–] arin@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

Export more manufacturing industries

[–] mx_smith@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If they built the amphibious assault ships to look like this, then they could fill them with Cybertrucks and anytime the US invaded a country it would be horrific and comical at the same time.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 10 points 4 months ago

Now playing in Venezuela: "The Bay of Cyberpigs".

[–] Nomorereddit@lemmy.today 7 points 4 months ago

Good. Hope they stop building death ships all together and are forced to have bake sales for more.

[–] nebajoth@piefed.ca 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I do wonder what the advent of drone warfare, including the marine drones used in the black sea against Russia, and the Taiwanese investment in drones for defense against China, has done to impact the outlook and priorities of the US Navy. It may very well be that it has changed the assessment of whether to purchase large expensive ships.

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

don't worry, they'll spend that $ somewhere for sure

[–] nebajoth@piefed.ca 5 points 4 months ago

Oh I'm not worried about that. I'm sure they will find more modern ways to murder.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Maybe they could use the boat materials to build some sort of arch. A triumphant arch.

[–] hume_lemmy@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 months ago

DOUBLE arches, in keeping with the administration.

[–] scaredoftrumpwinning@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago
[–] zjti8eit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 months ago

Sounds like may every engineering project I've worked on.