this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2025
130 points (99.2% liked)

News

36994 readers
1524 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The C.I.A. and an Afghan intelligence official said that the shooter had been part of an Afghan “partner force,” known as a Zero Unit, trained and supported by the agency in the southern province of Kandahar.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 64 points 4 months ago (2 children)

“The Biden administration justified bringing the alleged shooter to the United States in September 2021 due to his prior work with the U.S. government, including C.I.A., as a member of a partner force in Kandahar,” the C.I.A. director, John Ratcliffe, said in a statement, adding that the accused assailant “should have never been allowed to come here.”

So the CIA trained him to become a killer but he shouldn't have been allowed to be in America?

The USA is a cesspool.

[–] watson@lemmy.world 48 points 4 months ago (2 children)

They will say literally whatever they have to in order to shift blame from themselves to the Biden administration

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 4 months ago

This is all because of MAGA incompetence. The Biden Administration may have let him in, but it was the Trump Administration that gave him permanent status. It was on Trump to figure out this guy's deal BEFORE they made him fully legal.

No matter how loud they scream, this is Trump's fault.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 2 points 4 months ago

to the Biden administration

Which, sheesh, feels a million miles gone at this point, doesn't it?

I can't believe it's barely been a year, holy crap.

But that's always been these goons' playbook: Doesn't matter to them how long ago the "other teams'" administration was. Blame, blame, blame some more.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 10 points 4 months ago

The CIA agents who directed him also shouldn't be allowed to enter or remain in the United States.

[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago
[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 19 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I still find it hard to believe he would travel all the way across the country, just to shoot some random National Guardsmen at a bus stop. Dude's either got a mental illness, or he was contracted to sow chaos.

[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Spent practically his entire life in a war zone, because his native country was invaded by America, and was trained to be part of a CIA death squad.

I don't think you have to reach very far to find causality here.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

"Causality" in what sense? How does his upbringing and prior training explain travelling 3/4 of the way across a continent to shoot some random people, when there are still active National Guardsmen in California? Traveling twice as far, to hit a random target simply does not make sense. Hell, there are more engaging targets in Portland right now, if he wanted to make a statement, and that's right next door.

He literally drove the whole way...which makes this equal parts impulse and days-long anticipation. This whole thing smells off, unless he's just mentally ill.

[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It makes sense because of symbolism. An attack in DC is different than attack anywhere else in the country.

If his aims were political, then of course he would go there, and not Portland, or California.

None of this means he was of a sound mind, and I would say his upbringing means that he most likely not very well adjusted, how could he be?

Whether that extends to some specific diagnosis of mental illness, such as PTSD, I can't speak to.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So, you actually think this guy is a premeditating terrorist? With a handgun?

[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

You think he was contracted to sow chaos as part of a false flag operation, with a handgun?

Also, terrorist attacks are generally premeditated by design.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

"Contracted to sow chaos", meaning to do relatively little damage, but raise local tensions. Which is exactly what a false flag operation is intended to do. It's a motivator for policy change, not an actual terror attack.

If it was genuine terrorism, he wouldn't have gone 3/4 of the way across the country, "for maximum political impact"...and then only bring a handgun. It's a complete contradiction between intent and execution.

[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

As much as I appreciate your armchair terrorism PhD, the most likely answer is that he had severe PTSD from his participation in a CIA death squad, where he killed his own people in Afghanistan, including children.

How many American veterans have come back with PTSD and lashed out with gun violence?

Is it possible he was reactivated, or coerced, by a nefarious actor to achieve said bad actors political aims?

Sure, but you're making a lot of conclusions based on little to no evidence, and flatly ignoring or dismissing other more likely explanations.

By all means float the possibility that this is part of some conspiracy, but don't pretend that you have definitive evidence that gives you just cause for excluding all other possibilities, especially the possibilities that already fit into the existing American cycle of foreign wars and domestic gun violence.

For example, what if one of his friends or family members were recently deported? Or if he was enraged that after betraying his native homeland, he saw America under Trump descending into fascism and decided to lash out by shooting American military members inside America's Capital?

You're hung up on his choice pistol, but how close do you think he could have gotten to his targets with a long gun in the streets of DC? How long could he have walked in DC with an AR-15 slung over his back?

Or what if he couldn't afford a long gun? Or had other issues purchasing one?

There are many more reasonable explanations for this situation then your comments would lead people to believe, which is my point.

I will say this in your defense of your theory, he is such a terrible choice for a false flag operation, as evidenced by the immediate New York Times article about his CIA background, that it would fit my preconception of just how incompetent a Trump administration false flag attack would be.

I still think it's one of the lesser likely possibilities, but again, I'm not dismissing that it is possible, just that there are other more likely explanations.

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 17 points 4 months ago

Always blowback isn't it.