this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2025
136 points (89.5% liked)

Technology

40770 readers
352 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The average American now holds onto their smartphone for 29 months, according to a recent survey by Reviews.org, and that cycle is getting longer. The average was around 22 months in 2016.

While squeezing as much life out of your device as possible may save money in the short run, especially amid widespread fears about the strength of the consumer and job market, it might cost the economy in the long run, especially when device hoarding occurs at the level of corporations.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Talaraine@fedia.io 16 points 3 days ago

Costing the economy..... hahahahahaha

From a macroeconomics perspective, the best way forward is to give people money (handouts) so they can buy more stuff. More consumerism -> hotter economy.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 13 points 3 days ago

I got a new phone about a week ago. My old one was wildly overpowered for my use case, but ... I accidentally sat on it briefly, and the screen was never the same. I went from a Pixel 6 Pro to a 9a, and ... yeah, the screen seemed slightly smaller for a couple of days, but otherwise, it's faster than a device twice the price in 2021.

As with computers, we've hit "good enough" with phones for the most part. If you know why you need GPU cycles, that of course is another story, but for basic compute, we've nailed it. Hell, I'd still be running my i7-3770K -- a processor I bought in 2012 -- had my motherboard not died.

Things get shitty in terms of margins at the top of any technological S-curve.

I spent $500 on a phone that will get nearly seven years of updates, as I didn't buy it release day. Assuming I don't sit on it, that's a remaining 78 months at $6.41/month. My service is $15/month.

There's no money here anymore.

[–] Deyis@beehaw.org 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Think about how many additional phones you could buy each year if you cancelled your Netflix subscription and didn't eat as much avocado on toast.

[–] Sidhean@piefed.social 12 points 3 days ago

DAE millenials are killing the capitalism industry?

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

from my experience, netflix is one of the few companies who actually produce hot new shows somewhat regularly. it's weird to me how everybody keeps shitting on them.

[–] Deyis@beehaw.org 2 points 2 days ago

Personally, I cancelled Netflix due to a drought of content I actually wanted to watch and things disappearing from it with no notice. This combined with releasing shows weekly or one 'part' now and another in a month (so I have to stay subscribed) made it so it couldn't compete with piracy anymore.

[–] cheeseburger@piefed.ca 10 points 3 days ago

lol nice economy

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 12 points 3 days ago (2 children)

this sounds like the housing market stuff. you want folks to spend then get them jobs that provide for food and shelter and utilities and health insurance and then enough extra to spend on stuff.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Our devices don't change all that much to be honest. And the battery degregation is the only real reason to get a new phone. Some companies are even making it easy again to fix phones again.

Plus people can't afford 1000$ phones full stop.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jrockwar@feddit.uk 10 points 3 days ago

When flagships cost $500 I would keep them for 2 years. Now they cost $1000 I expect them to last twice as long. 🤷‍♂️ "The market" isn't only dictated by supply, it's supply and demand. It cuts both ways.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 10 points 3 days ago

What is to upgrade? Smartphones/phablets were always going to reach a peak, where the innovations that can be made are small. Screens look amazing, cameras are incredible, it's all at a point where phones do everything we want them to really well. Upgrades now are just iterative, battery improvements are welcome, improved camera sensors would be cool, but we dont need any of it, even faster SoCs, brighter or higher resolution screens are pointless now.

They can't really do much more, we dont need thinner, they are worse. Folding could be a potential avenue, but it's not there yet, they are far too fragile. There's going to have to be some new breakthrough tech to make a lot of people buy new phones, until then, they will have to keep trying to sell AI and some other bullshit features.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 8 points 3 days ago

Damn Edward Bernays and his consumerism. Maybe it would have happened anyway, but he pushed the idea of throwaway, buying the latest, trashing what works or could be repaired. So much waste for the sake of the economy.

[–] Tempus_Fugit@midwest.social 8 points 3 days ago

I'm at 3 years with my current phone and it still does everything I need it to. No need to replace.

Hmm... I wonder if this could be a factor here...

[–] ctrl_alt_esc@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 days ago

Either 22 or 29 months is ridiculous.. things should be used until they break and then ideally repaired and used more. My last phone I used for 7 years.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 3 points 3 days ago

7 years now.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›