this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
599 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

76974 readers
3215 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“I think what a CEO does is maybe one of the easier things maybe for an AI to do one day,” he said. Although he didn’t talk specifically about CEO functions that an AI could do better, Pichai noted the tech will eliminate some jobs but also “evolve and transition” others—ramifications that mean “people will need to adapt.”

Pichai’s comments come as other tech CEOs have also predicted the coming of a new era of chief executive automations. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman previously said AI will someday do his job better than him, adding, “I will be nothing but enthusiastic the day that happens.” Sebastian Siemiatkowski, CEO of buy-now-pay-later firm Klarna, also said in a post on X earlier this year that “AI is capable of doing all our jobs, my own included.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] somtwo@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

So I've already commented on this post, but I've had another thought: imagine if your CEO sent you an email saying "we need to do X". You respond with "no, X causes this issue, we need to do Y" and your CEO responds with "You're absolutely right! Here's how we will implement this new policy"

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 1 points 8 hours ago

If that happens I HOPE we can Use our TAX DOLLARS to make Sure CEOS can Continue their Extravagant Lifestyle!

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 12 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I'm no fan of CEOs but I don't really want AI in charge of stuff either

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

They are both psychopaths, you'd be hard pressed to find a difference.

They both see workers as a numbers and expendable.

[–] fishy@lemmy.today 2 points 15 hours ago

I'd say you want a human CEO so there's accountability, but I don't know that's even true anymore.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago

We as a civilization have 500,000 years of experience dealing with human leaders like that and absolutely no experience dealing with machine leaders like that. Too many variables. Fuck every part of this.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 17 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Let's run the job requirements list:

  • amoral
  • talks a lot about things they don't understand
  • comfortable with lying if it benefits their goals
  • emotionless psychpathic traits
  • uses enormous amount of resources for questinable gains
  • good at manipulation
  • bad at maths
  • occasional racist outbursts on social media

Yeah all seems to check out. Replace the CEOs, AI can't do worse.

[–] Quazatron@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago
[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago

So... that means they'll all step down and stop getting paid millions per year, right?

Right?

Guys? Right?

No?

...

😐

[–] Jinarched@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 day ago

Indeed, a LLM can certainly spout bullshit on social media.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago
[–] lapping6596@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago

Yes, it can. Research even indicates it can. He isn't saying anything actually novel.

Research in question: https://hbr.org/2024/09/ai-can-mostly-outperform-human-ceos

[–] falseWhite@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

AI is advancing so swiftly, he said, that over the next 12 months the tech will be able to perform “complex” tasks and act as an agent on a users’ behalf.

I must be having the same deja vu for a hundredth time. What a clown.

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They keep the lie alive to appease the stocks market happy.

And he didn't specify how shitty the complex tasks will be done.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 1 points 17 hours ago

Can't be worse than the shitshow he's doing

[–] SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Never thought I'd hear honesty out of a C-Suiter

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 1 points 17 hours ago

He's afraid he'll have to open his golden parachute before he can finish setting up his yacht flotilla

[–] Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca 3 points 20 hours ago

It’s maybe the only job it should actually replace.

I still wouldn’t trust the current models with it. But tbh even the current models couldn’t be any worse than the current humans in the roles.

[–] neuromorph@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

"Aw, sh*t. Half the country works for Brawndo. Not anymore! The stock has dropped to zero...

and the computer did that auto-layoff thing to everybody."

[–] somtwo@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The job of a tech CEO:

  • Chase trends
  • Mass layoffs in time to make the quarterly reports look better
  • FOMO
  • ???
  • Profit!
[–] Cricket@lemmy.zip 2 points 20 hours ago

Thanks, I hadn't seen a ??? -> Profit meme in quite a while! : D

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 48 points 1 day ago (5 children)

You don't even need AI. Just pay staff less and charge customers more, and give the stolen money to shareholders. Ta-da! That's the CEO's job done.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago

Because upper management is less checked, they make a lot of human choices, such as keeping a lot of bullshit job positions open as garden hermits (there for scenery, to look busy).

AI tasked with actually increasing profits may run the business better than their human counterparts.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I would love to see a study where they ask a 2024 AI for business decisions around things that happened in 2025. How much you want to bet it already can?

[–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago

Of course he's cool with AI taking his job, he's got a golden parachute for early retirement

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 120 points 1 day ago (6 children)

How is an AI chatbot going to eat a business lunch?

[–] sepi@piefed.social 23 points 1 day ago (6 children)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MoreZombies@quokk.au 56 points 1 day ago (4 children)

A computer can never be held accountable, so a computer should never hold a management position.

Also, Sundar Pichai is a dick.

[–] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca 66 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not being held accountable is the main tenant of modern CEOs

[–] unconsciousvoidling@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yea I’m not seeing any real difference. Something that plagurisng and takes credit for what others achieved and also isn’t held accountable for anything.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 1 day ago

Hate to add to this.

He's saying it to heat up the topic.

These people liked the heaps of cheap good hardware after the dotcom crash, so now they want cheap good hardware, specialized.

[–] Cyberflunk@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Fuck this festering, soul-sucking, vomit-inducing pile of rancid goat shit masquerading as a human being named Sundar Pichai. This tech-bro tyrant, this silicon-sucking vampire lord, deserves to have his entire empire of pixelated bullshit crumble into digital dust.

Fuck Sundar, his bloated ego, his bloodline of bootlicking enablers, his sprawling McMansion fortress built on the backs of underpaid code slaves. Fuck his family tree—may it wither and rot like the diseased orchard it is. Fuck his house, that gaudy shrine to ill-gotten greed, stuffed with gadgets that spy on the world while he hides in his ivory tower.

Fuck his company, that dystopian data-hoarding behemoth called Google—may it glitch into oblivion, algorithms choking on their own surveillance vomit. Fuck his billions, those filthy stacks of cash soaked in the sweat of exploited workers and the tears of privacy's victims. May his fortune evaporate faster than a crypto scam in a bear market.

Fuck his shit-stained excuses for opinions, those corporate diarrhea dribbles masquerading as wisdom. This guy's not just dangerous—he's a walking apocalypse, a societal cancer more toxic than any tin-pot dictator or orange-faced demagogue currently shitting on the world stage. He's the architect of our surveillance nightmare, the puppet master pulling strings while the planet burns. Burn in hell, you algorithm-abusing asshole—may your legacy be forgotten in the ashes of your own hubris!

[–] jali67@lemmy.zip 1 points 18 hours ago

Even worse, they are literally all like this among the tech companies. They are all cancerous vermin.

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 63 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I’m sure there are many jobs AI is not capable of doing but some CEOs probably do a bad enough job that an AI chat bot could probably do better.

I know we like to dump on CEOs all the time but a good CEO does not seem like one that could be replaced by AI, certainly not by what is currently being hyped. There are just a lot of highly visible companies with CEOs who aren’t actually very good. I suspect the dysfunction of publicly traded companies and the goals of Wall Street investors (or other nations’ equivalents) frequently not aligning with a good long-term health of a company has a strong influence on this.

And of course these guys will be happy to have AI replace them; they’ve already made boatloads of money and think they’ll be able to keep that going even if they lose their job.

[–] Prox@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Being a good CEO is 95% about social networking; creating and maintaining trustworthy relationships with others who will provide you with good support. AI can't do this, as it's a truly human thing.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Did anyone else, forced to use MS at work, wake up to an email from Sundar Pichai about the wonders of Copilot?

They are fucking desperate for anyone to take up on this garbage tech

[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Can’t wait for that AI dividend UBI check.

[–] Paradox 30 points 1 day ago

Something that consistently makes bad choices with little more than random probability? You don't say

[–] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

At least he's honest, I guess. This time.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That’s more an indictment of how we believe human society should be run than an endorsement of AI tbh

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm waiting for the day when a major company has their AI CEO absolutely tank the company.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I agree AI could easily take on the role of the biggest dork in the company, which is largely what the CEO is.

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

The only onstacle here is ethics, which the human CEOs already lack. So what are we waiting for?

load more comments
view more: next ›