this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
632 points (98.8% liked)

World News

51608 readers
2832 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 91 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And the Gripen will be built here in Canada!!!!

[–] assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 month ago (5 children)

To be fair, we've manufactured a lot of parts for other country's F35s so far. That's quite standard for defense contracts. Still, if Saab commits to bringing more guaranteed manufacturing jobs than the F35 program, it could be worth it. If this gives us a leg up in F35 manufacturing bids, that could also be worth it. Feels like a strong play regardless of outcome.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 46 points 1 month ago

I fucking hope so

[–] Toto@lemmy.world 40 points 1 month ago
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 38 points 1 month ago (12 children)

Now that the US is sending them to Saudi, how secure will they be from investigation by foreign adversaries?

Plus, the entire supply chain system of relying on the US for software and hardware updates, having to physically send the planes to the US for maintenance, all while the US continues to talk about annexing us is completely fucking bonkers.

Even without the annexation threats the setup would be stupid.

I know it’s a fancy and advanced plane, but knowing how the US military industrial complex works I’m pretty sure you’re paying a high multiplier for no reason too.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Try searching Google with "f-35 sales before:2024-11-01". Countries were lining up to buy them. Boeing had a years long manufacturing backlog.

No matter how you, personally, feel about the F-35 and the US military-industrial complex, Trump wants to both increase exports in general and tout US military strength. Most of NATO running with the F-35 would have been great for both of those. He could have succeeded at it by doing nothing. Complete failure of his own goals.

[–] murvel@feddit.nu 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Lockheed Martin. Boeing makes the F18 (for example)

[–] mysticpickle@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The Gripen is certainly not as advanced as F-35 but its operating costs per flight hour are only 1/5th of the F-35 which is definitely a big consideration when you don't have a US-sized defense budget.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago (6 children)

What role does the jet have to fulfill? Fight off enemy planes in an invasion? If it's the US that invades you wouldn't want US tech, but it doesn't really matter, the US would win. Russia invading? At this point they're down to kites and helium balloons, right?

If it's to fulfill a role within NATO, a Gripen is probably just as good as an F-35, because any enemy of NATO's will almost certainly be many generations behind. China wouldn't be, but neither Canada directly nor NATO is likely to get into a direct fighting war with China. Only maybe if Canada wanted to help defend Taiwan against Chinese aggression could that possibly happen. But, because Taiwan's a small island, Canada's Navy would probably be the main force involved.

In a few decades, things might already have changed. Missiles and drones might have made fighter jets essentially obsolete. So, it doesn't make too much sense to buy something that's massively expensive just because it's the most up-to-date thing right now.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 month ago

Canada should never trust any US military contractor ever again

[–] Kyle_The_G@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I've been commenting on a bunch of threads the best way to deal with a bully is to tell them to fuck off and go play with everyone else in the playground. Glad we're taking the first few steps in the right direction.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ragepaw@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 month ago

Thing the article conveniently leaves out, at least one of the "retired air force officers" works at (or did, seems to be some obfuscation) Lockheed Martin.

Of course they are against switching, they will lose their cushy lobbyist jobs.

[–] random_character_a@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago
[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 month ago

I hope we snub those unhinged fash. Fuck them.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Do it Canada! Purchase the SAAB and your pilots will have more seat time. The F-35 is a maintenance pig.

[–] GlassHalfHopeful@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 month ago
[–] psvrh@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 month ago
[–] remon@ani.social 12 points 1 month ago

I hope they do it! It's one of the few countries that can do it without hurting itself too much.

[–] engene@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago

It's what happens when you harm and betray a peaceful ally. Let's do this! 🍁

[–] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (12 children)

There is unfortunately a lot of nuance here.

A Gripen does not do the same things that an F35 does.

Europe simply does not have an answer to 5th or 6th generation fighters and I feel like wanting to be supporting of peoples respective countries and acknowledging the US being pretty awful right now is making people unwilling to acknowledge this glaring and incredibly important fault in western arms manufacturing outside of the US.

Humans benefit greatly when people, groups etc, specialize as less resources need to be wasted reinventing the wheel, but when it comes to defence, the current situations shows how flat footed CANZUK+EU* has been left by allowing the US to basically become the single source for some of the most crucial defence items.

Projects like FCAS need to cut the bureaucratic bullshit and speed up development as its increasingly obvious that the US is not a stable partner. CANZUK+EU* despite years of warning about these facts remained unwilling to spend, viewing it as inefficient, and with every individual state that has the capabilities holding recalcitrant attitudes, fighting over who gets to build what.

Basically, what I am saying, is that I would love to have non US weaponry, but if that weaponry can't compete with US weaponry, there isn't much of a point.

I mean, quite frankly, for us, Canada, the most important thing we could possibly do this decade, is to internally create our own ultimate strategic deterrents. Anything short of that would leave us completely defenceless to our greatest military threat, and largest neighbour. There is literally no chance we win any conventional war, so in a way, not even this fighter deal matters.

[–] MrFinnbean@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

I agree you on all points, but i want to add that weapon systems where manufactorer has a back door open and they can do things like remotelly lock the missile systems or other weapons, does not really sound appealing.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] RandomStickman@fedia.io 10 points 1 month ago

Euro canards my beloved

[–] jaxxed@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Gripen is a great jet for Canadian requirements.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (10 children)

I have no idea about the technical aspects but, with Murica not being an ally anymore, the F35 basically needing permission from Lockheed Martin to take off, and the F35 tech in the hands of the Saudi's and soon China... the F35s are worthless

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] CaptainPedantic@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Damn that's a sexy plane. Delta wing and canards? Hell yeah.

[–] potatoguy@lemmy.eco.br 9 points 1 month ago

The Gripen is quite interesting, who would have guessed that licensing fighter jets for manufacturing on other countries (Embraer is building them too, Colombia bought some, other countries seem to want it too) would be a good strategy?

I'll wait 50 years for a Gripen to be sold on Aliexpress for 150 thousand dollars, 250 thousand with replacement parts with a cool paint job.

[–] mintiefresh@piefed.social 9 points 1 month ago

Elbows up!!

[–] Sunshine@piefed.ca 8 points 1 month ago

MAGA would hate Canada escaping their abuse.

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

JK, fuck American tech

[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wasn't a major problem with the F35 that they can't fly in the Canadian north? Shouldn't we have at least some of our fleet that can be used throughout Canadian territory in our defense?

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago

I think they work fine as long as the hydraulic fluid is actually hydraulic fluid, and not water.

Don't leave your drums outside in the rain.

load more comments
view more: next ›